Not implying folks should wait. Please start without me.
On Dec 17, 2013 7:40 AM, "David Timothy Strauss" <david(a)davidstrauss.net>
I'll be joining in a bit late today.
On Dec 17, 2013 7:25 AM, "Stephen Gallagher" <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> I think we have four topics that we should discuss today before the
> winter holidays separate us.
> Just a reminder that the PRD needs to specify only our high-level
> goals and not define an implementation for them. It is acceptable (for
> example) to state that a use-case is "There must be a graphical
> configuration API for networking" without specifying a technology
> (e.g. NetworkManager) or a display mechanism (e.g. Wayland or Web UI).
> We merely need to identify what we want to accomplish, not how we will
> do it. That comes after the PRD approval and will require that we
> approach upstreams directly and ask for input and help. Something like
> a vendor analysis.
> #topic Final Assessment of Personas
> #topic PRD: Delivery Plan
> #topic PRD: Use Cases
> #topic PRD: Server Role Requirements
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> server mailing list