On 25. 11. 19 22:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonNoSemanticInterpositionSpeedup
>
> Simplified version of another change proposal|This change was
> originally proposed for [[Releases/32|Fedora 32]] as
> [[Changes/PythonStaticSpeedup]], however based on
> [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
> community feedback], it has been significantly reduced.
>
> == Summary ==
> We add the <code>-fno-semantic-interposition</code> compiler/linker
> flag when building Python interpreters, as it provides significant
> performance improvement, up to 27% depending on the workload. Users
> will no longer be able to use LD_PRELOAD to override a symbol from
> libpython, which we consider a good trade off for the speedup.
I just wanted to share this benchmark on Phoronix:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora-32-benchmarks&...
It looks really good. Thanks again David, Jan.
Maybe we should share it on social media?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Hey
Although the subject says it all but to elaborate, we need all the
help we can get to reach out to folks who can help us test and give
feedback about Kernel 5.6 and Fedora IoT. I wrote a magazine post[0].
[0] https://fedoramagazine.org/contribute-at-the-kernel-and-iot-edition-fedor...
--
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
