This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
The mail system
<social-media(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>: delivery via spamassassin: delivered
via spamassassin service
This is the mail system at host mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
The mail system
<social-media(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>: delivery via spamassassin: delivered
via spamassassin service
On 25. 11. 19 22:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonNoSemanticInterpositionSpeedup
>
> Simplified version of another change proposal|This change was
> originally proposed for [[Releases/32|Fedora 32]] as
> [[Changes/PythonStaticSpeedup]], however based on
> [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org…
> community feedback], it has been significantly reduced.
>
> == Summary ==
> We add the <code>-fno-semantic-interposition</code> compiler/linker
> flag when building Python interpreters, as it provides significant
> performance improvement, up to 27% depending on the workload. Users
> will no longer be able to use LD_PRELOAD to override a symbol from
> libpython, which we consider a good trade off for the speedup.
I just wanted to share this benchmark on Phoronix:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora-32-benchmarks&nu…
It looks really good. Thanks again David, Jan.
Maybe we should share it on social media?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
Hey
Although the subject says it all but to elaborate, we need all the
help we can get to reach out to folks who can help us test and give
feedback about Kernel 5.6 and Fedora IoT. I wrote a magazine post[0].
[0] https://fedoramagazine.org/contribute-at-the-kernel-and-iot-edition-fedora-…
--
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
Hey social team, can you please promote the HelloTux gear discount? The
Fedora Magazine article below is updated to include the discount code.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 09:42 Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:28 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > HelloTux is an approved vendor for Fedora swag, in return for which we
> get a
> > small royalty. This year, we've asked them to put that royalty towards a
> > discount for people buying more Fedora stuff -- we want to promote more
> than
> > we need the income.
> >
> > So, anyone who uses this link (until the royalty is exhausted)
> > will get a $5 / €5 discount on Fedora stuff:
> >
> > https://www.hellotux.com/fedora?coupon=FEDORA5
> >
> > Can we get a quick article highlighting this? Thanks!
> >
> We ran an article in November[1], so it's probably too soon for a full
> article about it. But I can update the article with that link and info
> and we can promote it on the social media channels.
>
> [1]
> https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-shirts-and-sweatshirts-from-hellotux/
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>
Hi friends,
I updated the Flock website with 2020 info (and the #DetroitFlockCity
at mattdm's request). Can you please promote it on our social
channels?
https://flocktofedora.org/
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
On Jan 13, 2020 3:52 PM, "Justin W. Flory" <jflory7(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alessio,
>
> On 1/12/20 6:15 PM, Alessio wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I submitted this idea to the marketing team some time ago [1]
> >
> > What do you think to have a Fedora presence on the Fediverse?
> > I'm not an expert, but it is now a mature technology, and no more an
> > hype. Many people started using Mastodon, in many cases with the intent
> > to leave the mainstream social medias.
> > I have not statistical data, but, looking around, a lot of these people
> > are concerned about privacy, freedom and digital rights, they are free
> > software supporters, and they are critical versus the overwhelm power
> > of the big giants of the internet.
> >
> > There were some toughts about running a Fedora instance [2], but maybe
> > it is not useful, it whould be an high energy expenditure; however this
> > is not the point of this mail.
> >
> > What I'm talking about is a profile on the fediverse.
> > We are on twitter, we are on facebook, youtube, instagram. Why not on a
> > social network that is powered by an open source software, and where
> > there are many free software supporters?
> >
> > Gnome is there https://floss.social/@gnome
> > Fosdem is there https://fosstodon.org/@fosdem
> > Opensuse is there https://fosstodon.org/@opensuse
> > Gentoo https://fosstodon.org/@gentoo
> > Ubuntu (that runs his own instance) https://ubuntu.social/@ubuntu
> > KDE https://mastodon.technology/@kde
> > And many other FOSS projects and communities.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-marketing/issue/286
> > [2] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-in-fediverse/1168
> >
> I think this is a tough issue for the volunteer community to take a lead
> on, even if the interest is there.
>
> To add historical context, we did discuss Mastodon at some point in the
> last couple years—I forget exactly when. There was no opposition to a
> Mastodon as a concept, but it was more an issue of who manages it.
> Most/all of Fedora's social media accounts are managed by Red Hat
> employees in RH's Open Source Program Office, with some volunteers on a
> few accounts.
>
> When it was last proposed, the discussion faded out because the folks
> managing Fedora's social media account were concerned there were already
> many platforms to cover and things would get dropped. For example, we
> used to have profiles on GNU Social and Diaspora, but I'm not sure if
> they were actively maintained.
>
> Account permissions and privileges is an issue still faced by Fedora's
> other social media accounts too. See these Mindshare tickets for more
> context:
Thank you for the exhaustive answer.
Then, proposing a community driven account is out of discussion.
Luckily Mastodon users can follow https://framapiaf.org/@fedora_fr in order to get news :D
Ciao,
A.