11:24 a.m.
Hey all,
Ive not had time to piece back together the corrupt filesystem that was
/mnt/koji We now have in place a backup.
I have setup a new koji hub, and its now available. i imported the f12 bits
and updates. as well as the f13 bits i could pull from the old filesystem.
I have started catching up the f12-updates and will get started on F-14 soon.
you should start to see updates for F-12 soon
Dennis
7:26 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:24:49AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Ive not had time to piece back together the corrupt filesystem that
was
/mnt/koji We now have in place a backup.
I have setup a new koji hub, and its now available. i imported the f12 bits
and updates. as well as the f13 bits i could pull from the old filesystem.
I have started catching up the f12-updates and will get started on F-14 soon.
Maybe the second class systems should skip e.g. all odd versions to save
work?
you should start to see updates for F-12 soon
I see them now. My system has used 76 new packages. Thanks.
R.
--
Tą bronią zabójczą są media, które robią ludziom wodę z mózgu. I tą bronią
macie walczyć i zwyciężać. (kpt. Z. Sulatycki do uczniów WSKSiM)
3:56 p.m.
On Friday, September 10, 2010 02:28:54 pm Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:24:49 pm Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> you should start to see updates for F-12 soon
Many thanks; seeing them.
Ok, getting updates, but many are not working. Is exactarch=1 still normal in
/etc/yum.conf? Are glibc updates going to continue to need exactarch=0? And are the
devel packages not rebuilt yet? That is, how close are we on the full updates rebuild?
4:52 p.m.
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 03:56:37 pm Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, September 10, 2010 02:28:54 pm Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, September 02, 2010 12:24:49 pm Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > you should start to see updates for F-12 soon
>
> Many thanks; seeing them.
Ok, getting updates, but many are not working. Is exactarch=1 still normal
in /etc/yum.conf? Are glibc updates going to continue to need
exactarch=0? And are the devel packages not rebuilt yet? That is, how
close are we on the full updates rebuild?
you shouldnt need exactarch=1
there is a bug in yum that we tracked down and is fixed upstream. waiting on
seth to push out an update.
http://yum.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=yum.git;a=commitdiff;h=a487c093c2c7c5e5c5...
is the commit that fixes it
I have run though koji-shadow completely a couple of times now somethings were
not attempted to be built due to things they were built against in primary
fedora failing to build. and im slowly working though fedora 14, we do have
gcc, glibc, kernel etc built. as well as python 2.7 and perl 5.12.1 still
alot that needs to be built though.
Dennis
5:37 p.m.
On Thursday, September 16, 2010 05:52:17 pm Dennis Gilmore wrote:
you shouldnt need exactarch=1
It is still the default in /etc/yum.conf, though. The glibc update worked on the E6500
with exactarch=0, which is good.
I have run though koji-shadow completely a couple of times now
somethings were
not attempted to be built due to things they were built against in primary
fedora failing to build. and im slowly working though fedora 14, we do have
gcc, glibc, kernel etc built. as well as python 2.7 and perl 5.12.1 still
alot that needs to be built though.
Ok, thanks for the update.
4975
days inactive
4989
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dennis Gilmore -
Lamar Owen -
Rafal Maszkowski