On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 15:13:09 -0500,
Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us> wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
>
> i would like to propose that we change the versioning of spin-kickstarts,
> for
> instance the version in f22 would always be 22 then use the rpm release
> field
> 0.X for prerelease builds and whole numbers for GA builds so the build
> just
> done for f22 GA would have been spin-kickstarts-22-1.fc22 anyone have any
> strong thoughts?
I'm not opposed to removing the leading zero, but I think we still need to
separate updates that happen to upstream and rebuilds done for other reasons
(most commonly mass rebuilds) done without having an update from upstream.
So you'd have releases like 22.1-1.fc22 and 22.2-1.fc22 and occasionally
sonething like 22.2-2.fc22.
I think do it exactly like fedora-release and fedora-repos
Have it as 0.x prior to GA. So 22-0.1 22-0.2 etc and then GA it
becomes 22-1 and any post releases, maybe that are needed for image
respins etc, because 22-2 and so on
Peter