What would folks think about adding fpaste to fedora-live-base and/or fedora-live-mini?
It's very small (60k uncompressed) and turns out to be very handy to help people on IRC with issues and problems they run into.
Thoughts?
kevin
+1
I use it for many various reasons.
-AdamM (From Android)
On Aug 6, 2010 10:11 PM, "Kevin Fenzi" kevin@scrye.com wrote:
What would folks think about adding fpaste to fedora-live-base and/or fedora-live-mini?
It's very small (60k uncompressed) and turns out to be very handy to help people on IRC with issues and problems they run into.
Thoughts?
kevin
_______________________________________________ spins mailing list spins@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/spins
+1 from me too - I like that idea, it's pretty helpful! I'd almost argue for both base files, to make sure they don't diverge too much. The dependency chain also looks sane, so yeah!
--Sebastian
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
What would folks think about adding fpaste to fedora-live-base and/or fedora-live-mini?
It's very small (60k uncompressed) and turns out to be very handy to help people on IRC with issues and problems they run into.
Thoughts?
kevin
spins mailing list spins@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/spins
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 05:11:34 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
What would folks think about adding fpaste to fedora-live-base and/or fedora-live-mini?
-1 as fpaste.org server has longterm unfixed bug blocking its usage on various clients and nobody can fix the bug as it is server-side bug: http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/server-bugs/27
Regards, Jan
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:18:01 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 05:11:34 +0200, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
What would folks think about adding fpaste to fedora-live-base and/or fedora-live-mini?
-1 as fpaste.org server has longterm unfixed bug blocking its usage on various clients and nobody can fix the bug as it is server-side bug: http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/server-bugs/27
Withdrawing it, -> +1, the bug has been fixed now.
Thanks, Jan
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil@redhat.com wrote:
-1 as fpaste.org server has longterm unfixed bug blocking its usage on various clients and nobody can fix the bug as it is server-side bug: http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/server-bugs/27
While this particular bug is fixed, it begs two questions (neither of which I know the answers to):
1) Do we want to have something that points to non-infrastructure maintained services and casts them in such a light as they are "official" services in the default spin? We (Fedora Infrastructure) don't have the wherewithal to fix fpaste.org if/when it's busted. 2) If the answer to #1 is no, what is preventing us from hosting paste.fedoraproject.org?
As a side note, is the source for fpaste.org somewhere? I couldn't find it looking at the site, but maybe I'm stupid. :)
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Jon Stanley jonstanley@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil@redhat.com wrote:
-1 as fpaste.org server has longterm unfixed bug blocking its usage on various clients and nobody can fix the bug as it is server-side bug: http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/server-bugs/27
While this particular bug is fixed, it begs two questions (neither of which I know the answers to):
- Do we want to have something that points to non-infrastructure
maintained services and casts them in such a light as they are "official" services in the default spin? We (Fedora Infrastructure) don't have the wherewithal to fix fpaste.org if/when it's busted. 2) If the answer to #1 is no, what is preventing us from hosting paste.fedoraproject.org?
+1 here. If we use the fpaste client tool, it seems it could simply be adjusted in the RPM to point to paste.fp.o.
As a side note, is the source for fpaste.org somewhere? I couldn't find it looking at the site, but maybe I'm stupid. :)
I wonder if fpaste.org is using an open pastebin software. I don't see sources for fpaste.org anywhere, but I did notice that there is a django based pastebin on the http://fpaste.org/about/ page.
Cheers,
Clint
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 01:02:54 -0600 Clint Savage herlo1@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Jon Stanley jonstanley@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil@redhat.com wrote:
-1 as fpaste.org server has longterm unfixed bug blocking its usage on various clients and nobody can fix the bug as it is server-side bug: http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/server-bugs/27
While this particular bug is fixed, it begs two questions (neither of which I know the answers to):
- Do we want to have something that points to non-infrastructure
maintained services and casts them in such a light as they are "official" services in the default spin? We (Fedora Infrastructure) don't have the wherewithal to fix fpaste.org if/when it's busted. 2) If the answer to #1 is no, what is preventing us from hosting paste.fedoraproject.org?
+1 here. If we use the fpaste client tool, it seems it could simply be adjusted in the RPM to point to paste.fp.o.
I know there have been discussions in infrastructure before about hosting a paste service. I think the issues were:
- Dealing with the spammers is a pain. - It's django based, and we currently don't have any django setup in fedora infrastructure.
As a side note, is the source for fpaste.org somewhere? I couldn't find it looking at the site, but maybe I'm stupid. :)
I wonder if fpaste.org is using an open pastebin software. I don't see sources for fpaste.org anywhere, but I did notice that there is a django based pastebin on the http://fpaste.org/about/ page.
I think it is django based.
I will find out and update this thread.
kevin
-
Adam Miller -
Clint Savage -
Jan Kratochvil -
Jon Stanley -
Kevin Fenzi -
Sebastian Dziallas