Am Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:40:08 -0600
schrieb Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:39:52 +0200
Sebastian Vahl <deadbabylon(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the current [1] nightly spin of the x86_64 kde live image is 12 megs
> bigger than my local one. So I've downloaded the spin to compare the
> package lists and I see absolutely no difference. For comparison:
>
> {%name}-%version-%[release}:
>
http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/livecd/packagelists/f12/long-F12-KDE-035-i68...
>
http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/livecd/packagelists/f12/long-kde-x86_64-2009...
>
> %{name} %{size}:
>
http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/livecd/packagelists/f12/size-name-F12-KDE-03...
>
http://deadbabylon.de/fedora/livecd/packagelists/f12/size-kde-x86_64-2009...
>
> So I'm just curious why this happens. I assume you're only running
> on spinning at once? I'm asking because I've seen the image
> increasing in size when my machine was busy with other things.
Yeah, it does them one at a time and doesn't do anything else.
I'm not sure what would explain the difference in size. :(
It seems that the recent changes to livecd-creator fixes the problem
with failing resize2fs at least partly. Yesterdays images are way
better:
kde-i386-20090824.15.iso 24-Aug-2009 17:13 629M
kde-x86_64-20090824.15.iso 24-Aug-2009 17:34 635M
Sebastian