On Thursday 07 April 2011, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 07:58 +0000 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> commit 596ef8e70cb7369826e8b9d45a0c56e2cc39ddd0
> Author: Kevin Kofler <Kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org>
> Date: Thu Apr 7 09:58:07 2011 +0200
>
> fedora-live-mini.ks: Don't prelink this either.
> The mini images are even less likely to want that kind of a size
> increase.
The owner of the mini image explicitly agreed to this change.
Let me quote you from #fedora-kde:
(09:30:04) Kevin_Kofler: Hmmm, but prelink was already run on April 2
and there the i386 image wasn't oversized. Weird.
(09:30:57) Kevin_Kofler: I'm not sure whether the size increase is
really prelink's fault or whether it's just a fluke.
In other words: You have no idea what it going on.
Actually I do. I only figured it out after I made those comments. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679880#c15
The reason for the difference between i386 and x86_64 on April 2 is that the
i386 prelink failed because -m wasn't used. So i386 only got the bloat the
next day when that got fixed.
YOu don't read the meeting minutes, you don't bother to
contact the spins
SIG and you don't even have a clue if it was really the fault prelink - but
still you revert the change. This is unprofessional and unacceptable.
Sorry, but this is urgent because the RC1 compose is imminent!
Kevin Kofler