On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 11:32 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 21:21 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
>
> compat-db45
> hunspell
> hunspell-en
>
> I'm sure that pungi is inevitably to blame, but I'm wondering if we
> shouldn't add those packages to fedora-livecd-desktop.ks and/or
> fedora-live-base.ks in the meantime.
Does your compose log mention any missing deps?
Quite a few. Here are the relevant ones:
$ grep "Unresolvable dependency .*\(hunspell\|db\)" i386.log | sort -u
Pungi.WARNING: Unresolvable dependency compat-db45 in rpm.i386
Pungi.WARNING: Unresolvable dependency hunspell-en in libsexy.i386
Pungi.WARNING: Unresolvable dependency libdb-4.5.so in rpm.i386
Pungi.WARNING: Unresolvable dependency libdb-4.5.so in rpm-libs.i386
Pungi.WARNING: Unresolvable dependency libhunspell-1.2.so.0 in
enchant.i386
A fresh install with the media you created, does yum report any
problems with the rpmdb?
Once I put libdb-4.5.so in place so I could access the rpmdb,
package-cleanups --problems reported those 3 packages missing.
This could simply be a case of missing deps recorded in the packages
themselves, and if the deps are missing, pungi can't know to grab 'em.
The packages seem to be excluded a bit further up:
http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pungi-i386.log
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed