The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
BrOffice stopped building a few days ago with an issue with a ks reference not being found. This doesn't appear to be from the recent BrOffice commit, but I am not sure yet what changed to cause the problem.
The other spins are all building OK.
I haven't heard that Meego has officially been granted board approval, but am expecting that soon.
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:00 -0400 Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
libreoffice only has landed in rawhide so far... so that shouldn't be the cause of space increase I wouldn't think.
kevin
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:12:43 -0600, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:00 -0400 Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
libreoffice only has landed in rawhide so far... so that shouldn't be the cause of space increase I wouldn't think.
Could this be the pino change?
Anyway, someone should take a look at what is getting pulled in.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:12:43 -0600, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:00 -0400 Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
libreoffice only has landed in rawhide so far... so that shouldn't be the cause of space increase I wouldn't think.
Kevin, did anything change on the build machines around the 7th? I am not seeing commits to spin-kickstarts (git repo) that would have broken things. The spin-kickstarts package has been in stable for about a month now. So I am thinking a change on the build machines is a likely cause.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:42:47 -0500 Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:12:43 -0600, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:00 -0400 Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
libreoffice only has landed in rawhide so far... so that shouldn't be the cause of space increase I wouldn't think.
Kevin, did anything change on the build machines around the 7th? I am not seeing commits to spin-kickstarts (git repo) that would have broken things. The spin-kickstarts package has been in stable for about a month now. So I am thinking a change on the build machines is a likely cause.
Well, there was the usual stream of updates:
certmaster-0.27-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 08:01:49 PM UTC func-0.27-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 07:37:41 PM UTC xorg-x11-server-devel-1.9.0-13.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:58 PM UTC nagios-common-3.2.2-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:58 PM UTC bash-completion-1.2-4.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:54 PM UTC hal-0.5.14-5.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:53 PM UTC hal-filesystem-0.5.14-5.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:52 PM UTC parted-2.3-2.fc14.2 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:51 PM UTC nrpe-2.12-14.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:51 PM UTC make-3.82-2.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:50 PM UTC procps-3.2.8-12.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:49 PM UTC traceroute-2.0.16-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:48 PM UTC net-tools-1.60-105.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:48 PM UTC glibmm24-2.24.2-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:48 PM UTC libgweather-2.30.3-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:45 PM UTC libgnomekbd-2.32.0-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:42 PM UTC bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:41 PM UTC gnupg2-2.0.16-3.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:40 PM UTC openssh-server-5.5p1-21.fc14.2 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:38 PM UTC openssh-clients-5.5p1-21.fc14.2 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:37 PM UTC libjpeg-turbo-utils-1.0.1-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:37 PM UTC xulrunner-1.9.2.10-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:36 PM UTC libgnomeui-2.24.4-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:32 PM UTC systemd-10-2.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:31 PM UTC ConsoleKit-x11-0.4.2-2.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:30 PM UTC ConsoleKit-0.4.2-2.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:29 PM UTC ConsoleKit-libs-0.4.2-2.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:28 PM UTC systemd-units-10-2.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:27 PM UTC grep-2.7-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:27 PM UTC libbonoboui-2.24.4-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:26 PM UTC libgnome-2.32.0-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:24 PM UTC libbonobo-2.32.0-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:22 PM UTC gnome-vfs2-2.24.4-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:20 PM UTC libjpeg-turbo-1.0.1-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:18 PM UTC hal-libs-0.5.14-5.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:18 PM UTC libgnomecanvas-2.30.2-1.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:17 PM UTC openssh-5.5p1-21.fc14.2 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:16 PM UTC krb5-libs-1.8.2-6.fc14 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:15 PM UTC bzip2-libs-1.0.6-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:15 PM UTC gtk2-2.22.0-1.fc14.1 Fri 08 Oct 2010 04:19:10 PM UTC
I don't see why any of those would have caused an issue...
kevin
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:41:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
Looking at this more carefully it looks like the size increase and breakage are related. I missed some other broken spins as well. Pretty much it looks like the livecd-deskop ks disappeared.
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:36:56 -0500 Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:41:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen mclasen@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 09:03 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
Are we talking about F14 spins, or rawhide ? In any case, the target hasn't changed. I can only assume that the OOo -> libreoffice switch may have thrown off our exclusions ?
Looking at this more carefully it looks like the size increase and breakage are related. I missed some other broken spins as well. Pretty much it looks like the livecd-deskop ks disappeared.
Looks like there may have been some network/issue with checking out the git tree the other day. ;(
I'll check out a fresh copy for todays if a compose every lands. ;(
kevin
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Looks like there may have been some network/issue with checking out the git tree the other day. ;(
I'll check out a fresh copy for todays if a compose every lands. ;(
Thanks. That will likely fix everything but the size issue. There is a reasonable chance that will fix the size issue for Desktop, since that changed on the same day, but we'll need to wait and see.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Looks like there may have been some network/issue with checking out the git tree the other day. ;(
I'll check out a fresh copy for todays if a compose every lands. ;(
It looks like that fixed everything, including the live desktop spin size. So things are looking good now.
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:43:38 -0500 Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:54:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
Looks like there may have been some network/issue with checking out the git tree the other day. ;(
I'll check out a fresh copy for todays if a compose every lands. ;(
It looks like that fixed everything, including the live desktop spin size. So things are looking good now.
Yep. Was going to drop a note to that effect. ;)
Thanks!
kevin
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:03:50 -0500, Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
BrOffice stopped building a few days ago with an issue with a ks reference not being found. This doesn't appear to be from the recent BrOffice commit, but I am not sure yet what changed to cause the problem.
The other spins are all building OK.
I was reviewing spin sizes again today and see that desktop is going to be very close. This build predates the background change getting into stable and doesn't reflect the compression effort. The initial intention was that it include animated backgrounds.
It looks like the size bump happened a day later for it. Probably just due to compose timing.
Probably there won't be a new composes before this afternoon's Spins SIG meeting. But we'll need to check on closely throughout the RC period.
Em Seg, 2010-10-18 às 11:25 -0500, Bruno Wolff III escreveu:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:03:50 -0500, Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
The Desktop spin jumped about 200MB in size a few days ago. Can someone update me on whether Desktop is targeting a CD or something else this time around? If the target is 1GB now, then things are OK.
BrOffice stopped building a few days ago with an issue with a ks reference not being found. This doesn't appear to be from the recent BrOffice commit, but I am not sure yet what changed to cause the problem.
The other spins are all building OK.
I was reviewing spin sizes again today and see that desktop is going to be very close. This build predates the background change getting into stable and doesn't reflect the compression effort. The initial intention was that it include animated backgrounds.
It looks like the size bump happened a day later for it. Probably just due to compose timing.
I just composed the BrOffice.org Spin here and it is back on track. Thanks Bruno and Martin again for fixing this.
Regards,
-
Bruno Wolff III -
Igor Pires Soares -
Kevin Fenzi -
Matthias Clasen