-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/13/2010 04:36 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:43:33 -0400
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/13/2010 03:41 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:09:28 -0400
>> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, noticed a tiny oversight on patch 0001. I had only fixed the
>>> DEBUG message for the add case, and missed the del case. The new
>>> patch 0001 corrects this.
>>>
>>
>> Aren't those bugs a separate issue worth their own patch ?
>> (there is also no mention of this issue in the commit message
>> AFAICS)
>>
>> Simo.
>>
>
> I can split them out. I only included them because I needed to fix
> them to help identify the real problem.
They are a potential crash bug, so it would be better if we separated
them as they are a fix on their own.
If you split them you get as bonus an automatic ack for all three :)
Simo.
Split and attached for posterity. Thanks for the review.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkyPZZMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PbKACfc31Om0Z5fAz11kyb9gjtwMjC
FrwAoI1YFW2JiGdmpKF45GQKc2wgBvOr
=p6um
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----