On 04/03/2015 01:16 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2611
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hello Pavel,
you patch LGTM and ci passed, but my tests failed: 1) enable enumeration 2) set ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout to something lower than default 3) enter break-point into sdap_get_users_send() 4) wait for ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout seconds then continue 5) segfault should happen
If I apply on top of your patch my attached patch the test passes, would you consider squeezing my patch into yours?
Thanks!
On 04/03/2015 05:31 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 04/03/2015 01:16 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2611
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hello Pavel,
you patch LGTM and ci passed, but my tests failed:
- enable enumeration
- set ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout to something lower than default
- enter break-point into sdap_get_users_send()
- wait for ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout seconds then continue
- segfault should happen
If I apply on top of your patch my attached patch the test passes, would you consider squeezing my patch into yours?
Thanks!
Thanks, squashed.
On 04/07/2015 02:41 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/03/2015 05:31 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 04/03/2015 01:16 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2611
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hello Pavel,
you patch LGTM and ci passed, but my tests failed:
- enable enumeration
- set ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout to something lower than default
- enter break-point into sdap_get_users_send()
- wait for ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout seconds then continue
- segfault should happen
If I apply on top of your patch my attached patch the test passes, would you consider squeezing my patch into yours?
Thanks!
Thanks, squashed.
Great, thanks. But now I guess somebody else must do the review as we both changed the code.
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 04/07/2015 02:41 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/03/2015 05:31 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 04/03/2015 01:16 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2611
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hello Pavel,
you patch LGTM and ci passed, but my tests failed:
- enable enumeration
- set ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout to something lower than default
- enter break-point into sdap_get_users_send()
- wait for ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout seconds then continue
- segfault should happen
If I apply on top of your patch my attached patch the test passes, would you consider squeezing my patch into yours?
Thanks!
Thanks, squashed.
Great, thanks. But now I guess somebody else must do the review as we both changed the code.
Pavel agreed to your changed, just ack/nack the result.
On 04/07/2015 02:47 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 04/07/2015 02:41 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 04/03/2015 05:31 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 04/03/2015 01:16 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2611
sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Hello Pavel,
you patch LGTM and ci passed, but my tests failed:
- enable enumeration
- set ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout to something lower than default
- enter break-point into sdap_get_users_send()
- wait for ldap_enumeration_refresh_timeout seconds then continue
- segfault should happen
If I apply on top of your patch my attached patch the test passes, would you consider squeezing my patch into yours?
Thanks!
Thanks, squashed.
Great, thanks. But now I guess somebody else must do the review as we both changed the code.
Pavel agreed to your changed, just ack/nack the result. _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
ACK, ci passed: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/12/55/summary.html
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:13:53PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
ACK, ci passed: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/12/55/summary.html
* master: 725bb2a9901c4f673b107ed179f5d68ec443ca63 * sssd-1-12: 81bb9be1ae0b2a4ebe960f136a52576abcdfbbac * sssd-1-11: c34ac0da2396205200095a1223c3aec02c882d07
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org