[Fedora QA] #149: Mentor Request
by fedora-badges
#149: Mentor Request
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: hellork | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
= phenomenon =
I am interested in joining the protesters and I'm requesting a mentor.
= reason =
I have been filing bug reports and working on submitting a couple new
projects to Fedora. I have a good working knowledge of Yum update, C, C++,
Makefiles, Bash, Python, Java, and RPM, packaging, etc.
= recommendation =
Sign me up!
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/149>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 4 months
[Fedora QA] #145: Request to join ProvenTester
by fedora-badges
#145: Request to join ProvenTester
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: dbhole | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
OpenJDK is a widely used package, and has quarterly security updates (at
the very least). While we (devel and qe) team test it, there is no way for
us to set a +1 karma as a proven-tester.
To that end, I would like to apply for proven tester status. In addition
to OpenJDK, this will also allow me to test and set the proper Karma for
other packages our team owns.
I'd be happy to follow and training guidelines laid out by a Proventester
Mentor.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/145>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 4 months
[Fedora QA] #98: Request for a Mentor
by fedora-badges
#98: Request for a Mentor
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: jdulaney | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
I would like to now formally request a Proven Tester Mentor. I have been
running Fedora since FC1, generally updating every other release (I
skipped 9 and went straight to 10). I have several boxes so as to get
different hardware involved.
Thanks,
John H. Dulaney
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jdulaney
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/98>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 4 months
[Fedora QA] #60: Devise a better location for critpath.txt
by fedora-badges
#60: Devise a better location for critpath.txt
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Wiki | Version:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
critpath.txt lists critical path packages [1]. Currently it is referenced
as
{{{
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-<<CURRENT
DATE>>/logs/critpath.txt
}}}
or
{{{
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-<<YESTERDAY
DATE>>/logs/critpath.txt
}}}
depending on which page. Similarly for branched releases.
This is not optimal. Very often the url just doesn't work. For example at
the time of writing critpath.txt on F13 Alpha Release Criteria page [2]
references rawhide-20100407/ directory, where critpath.txt is not
available. Nor it is available in rawhide-20100406/ directory. Only in
rawhide-20100405/ it is finally available.
The very page Critical Path Packages [1] references critpath.txt for
Branched release, which is available ATM, but also references critpath.txt
for Rawhide, which is again not available.
Let's imagine other use case - some automated tool must decide whether
package in the critical path. It can't rely on path which are constantly
changing and sometimes are not available.
critpath.txt is created dynamically, so we probably must have the contents
created every day or so. But we should devise such mechanism that the
location is stable and the file is always available (if new contents fails
to create, the old contents is still available). That will also allow
third-party tools to rely on it.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_Path_Packages [[BR]]
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/60>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 4 months
[Fedora QA] #134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests
by fedora-badges
#134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: rhe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Test Review | Version:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
We've heard many users installing by writing ISO to USB drive and having
problems about it. So it's better to have a clear story from anaconda or
whoever on what exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to
USB, and what isn't. It would be good to clear it up and add some specific
install validation tests for it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 8 months
[Fedora QA] #79: Add firstboot release criteria
by fedora-badges
#79: Add firstboot release criteria
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jlaska | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki | Version:
Keywords: retrospective |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
= problem =
See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=574596
RHBZ#574596 - Smolt does not run at firstboot]
= analysis =
We don't have a way to know what firstboot modules are expected, we need
to document this as release criteria, or write a test to report the issue
(for details, see RHBZ #574596).
= enhancement recommendation =
The release criteria do not include what
image:Package-x-generic-16.pngfirstboot modules are intended for Fedora.
Often, firstboot some modules are missing or disabled, and we don't notice
or know whether this is a blocker. Recommend clarifying the use cases of
firstboot in the release criteria.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/79>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
12 years, 8 months
Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan
by Tao Wu
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the pre-beta acceptance test run of Fedora 15. Thanks for your attention. It is a good news that the pre-RC installation version has passed the major test, which is used to identify any major test blockers prior to the Test Compose (TC).Let's expect the exciting coming out of F15-TC1 next week!
If you have spare time and want to contribute by verify this version, the test cases and results can be found on the following URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Pre-RC_Acceptance_T...
Thanks a lot!
Good Luck,
Tao Wu
12 years, 9 months
