test May 2011

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

164 participants
405 discussions

[Fedora QA] #170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
by fedora-badges 08 Dec '11

08 Dec '11

#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: jskarvad | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- We would like to have the Power Management test day on 2011-03-24 (or maybe later). Such event would help us to test the PM functionality (especially suspend / hibernate and tuned profiles) across wide HW configurations. We are able to prepare detailed test instructions and scripts for test semi-automation. Feature page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PowerManagementF15 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/170> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 11

[Fedora QA] #134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests
by fedora-badges 24 Aug '11

24 Aug '11

#134: Clarify the ISO to USB tests -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Test Review | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- We've heard many users installing by writing ISO to USB drive and having problems about it. So it's better to have a clear story from anaconda or whoever on what exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to USB, and what isn't. It would be good to clear it up and add some specific install validation tests for it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/134> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

2 14

[Fedora QA] #79: Add firstboot release criteria
by fedora-badges 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

#79: Add firstboot release criteria ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=574596 RHBZ#574596 - Smolt does not run at firstboot] = analysis = We don't have a way to know what firstboot modules are expected, we need to document this as release criteria, or write a test to report the issue (for details, see RHBZ #574596). = enhancement recommendation = The release criteria do not include what image:Package-x-generic-16.pngfirstboot modules are intended for Fedora. Often, firstboot some modules are missing or disabled, and we don't notice or know whether this is a blocker. Recommend clarifying the use cases of firstboot in the release criteria. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/79> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan
by Tao Wu 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

Greetings folks, Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the pre-beta acceptance test run of Fedora 15. Thanks for your attention. It is a good news that the pre-RC installation version has passed the major test, which is used to identify any major test blockers prior to the Test Compose (TC).Let's expect the exciting coming out of F15-TC1 next week! If you have spare time and want to contribute by verify this version, the test cases and results can be found on the following URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Pre-RC_Acceptance_Tes… Thanks a lot! Good Luck, Tao Wu

2 5

Housekeeping
by Adam Williamson 28 Jun '11

28 Jun '11

This is kind of half a memo-to-self, but of course, the more people who help out, the merrier :) So we have various housekeeping tasks that come under the Bugzappers umbrella, and may have been neglected lately: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora15 since we haven't run a Bugzappers meeting for a while we should check up on these and make sure they're happening; it may make sense to pull them into the QA process instead of Bugzappers, or just run a BZ meeting to look after them. If anyone is already working on this, or has a good plan, do speak up! Otherwise I'll look at doing something about it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net

3 8

[Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
by fedora-badges 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- = bug description = Please update the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts test case to clarify that explicit Conflicts: tags are okay. = bug analysis = The relevant release criterion is "No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (CD/DVD) install". The term "file conflicts" here is important. I believe it's intended to mean that only cases where the files in two packages conflict, but there is no explicit Conflicts: tag in the packages. Where the conflict is properly marked in the packages with Conflicts: tags, this should not be considered an infringement of the criterion. = fix recommendation = Change expected results: 2. No file conflicts were detected for packages included in the media kit, unless the conflicting packages also have explicit Conflicts: tags -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 19

[Fedora QA] #173: Obsoleting the tests for verifying http/nfs/ftp/hard disk install sources
by fedora-badges 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

#173: Obsoleting the tests for verifying http/nfs/ftp/hard disk install sources -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- = problem = Now that install.img is included in initrd.img, it can no longer be loaded from somewhere else other than media, therefore Using 'askmethod' is actually the same as 'repo=' which is to direct anaconda using a specific package repo. = analysis = So I propose to obsolete the install source test cases of install sources from http, nfs, ftp, hd, and only test the package repositories of these methods. = enhancement recommendation = The following tests will be kept: - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceBootIso InstallSourceBootIso] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceDvd InstallSourceDvd] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:TestCases/Install_Source_Live_Image Install_Source_Live_Image] The following will be obsoleted: - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceHttp InstallSourceHttp] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfs InstallSourceNfs] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfsIso InstallSourceNfsIso] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceFtpAnonymous InstallSourceFtpAnonymous] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceFtpNonAnonymous InstallSourceFtpNonAnonymous] - [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceHardDrive InstallSourceHardDrive] Current package repository tests are listed at: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Repository Category:Repository] Hard disk and nfs iso repo tests need be added, then they'll cover all package install methods. clumens, how do you think of these? do the remaining tests(install source+repo) cover the common use cases? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/173> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 12

[Fedora QA] #84: Define install matrix baseline
by fedora-badges 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

#84: Define install matrix baseline ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = * We almost didn't find [http://bugzilla.redhat.com/578633 RHBZ#578633 - Unable to enter passphrase to unlock encrypted disk partitions] * When re-using test results from a previous test run, it's possible to include results for tests that should be re-tested. This would be bad. = analysis = * F-13 Beta candidate#3 didn't include the correct version of ''plymouth'' (see RHBZ #578633). * Since it was Beta#3 and not much was supposed to change from Beta#2, some test results from the previous Beta#2 candidate were carried forward. * Thankfully, QA found the problem before release while running the QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_(encrypted)_install test. = enhancement recommendation = * Establish better guidelines about which test results can be carried forward from one candidate to the next (this isn't easy). Or perhaps, establish a subset of tests that all respins must undergo. * Perhaps link to, or document at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/84> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 6

[Fedora QA] #194: proven tester request
by fedora-badges 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

#194: proven tester request -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: sanchez | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Hi all, I would like to join the Fedora project actively, and I believe testing packages could be my first step on the project. I do have experience with Linux for many years now, as a professional as well as a hobbyist. I can also do some scripting with python and bash and always had interest in opensource, testing, GPL , HA clustering etc. Salud!, Raúl, -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/194> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 11

[Fedora QA] #86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade
by fedora-badges 15 Jun '11

15 Jun '11

#86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = See [http://bugzilla.redhat.com/590823 RHBZ#590823 - Text-mode upgrade fails when installing new bootloader -- KeyError: 'bootloader'] = analysis = Some tests in the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test install test matrix] involve user interface components in both text-mode and graphical-mode (native or VNC). One such bug (RHBZ #590823) involved a problem found only during text-mode upgrades to Fedora 13. The text-mode upgrade screen shows different options thanenhancement recommendation = = enhancement recommendation = I'm hesitant to recommend specific text-mode tests for each user interface element that differs in text-mode and graphical-mode (it would be exhaustive but unachievable). As a catch-all, testing a text-mode install is included in the current matrix. Is there something small that can be done to cover the gap? 1. Perhaps adding a text-mode upgrade test case to the install matrix, or ... 2. Adding variations to the existing upgrade tests [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Update_Bootload… QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Update_Bootloader] and [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Skip_Bootloader QA:Testcase_Anaconda_Upgrade_Skip_Bootloader] to also test text-mode, or ... 3. <insert better idea here> -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/86> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 11

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
41
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test May 2011