test June 2013

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

104 participants
347 discussions

[Fedora QA] #221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
by fedora-badges 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Trac | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- == Description == While the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting blocker bug review meetings] are very much a necessary thing, they have a tendency to be long, tedious and not a whole lot of fun for those involved. During the Fedora 15 retrospective, there was a request to streamline the process in order to distribute the workload and avoid more 4+ hour meetings. Any proposals on how to reduce the length of the meetings while maintaining their utility would be much appreciated. == Proposals == Pending discussion in comments and email -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/221> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 15

[Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management
by fedora-badges 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

#152: Test Cases Management ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = We've been using mediawiki to manage tests and record results, though it's easy to approach, it has limitations such as managing, tracking and querying cases+results. So is it time for us to consider another solution such as TCMS? = analysis = Here I quoted the suggestion from Victer Chen: some advantages of TCMS: * Better to record, track and query test results, * Allow user focus on test contents instead of document maintenance. * Share test cases However, it couldn't be flexible as wiki. I think the most important things need balance are below: - Barriers Fedora should provide very low barriers. TCMS could be configured to allow anonymous user login and limit it's permission. Also, we can consider using fedora account to login TCMS. - Safety Wiki provides the ability to rollback content easily, while TCMS couldn't. What TCMS can do is recording all the history and allow user recovery it manually. But if we configure the permission well, it should not be a big problem. = enhancement recommendation = Work with TCMS team and package it to Fedora. Set up the system and use it in a small scale first. If it turns out good, enlarger the scale. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

4 25

[Fedora QA] #81: Add i18n release criteria
by fedora-badges 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

#81: Add i18n release criteria ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: retrospective | ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ = problem = See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=571900 RHBZ#571900 - Keyboard mapping not correct (USA instead of Belgium) when first login after install Fedora 13 Alpha] = analysis = * Currently we don't have i18n installation cases, so local language install is not tested as a demand. Untranslated pages are still existing after RC test. Such cases needed be added in test as well as release criteria. * Does the Fedora i18n team have any release criteria to propose? * RHBZ #571900 pointed out the need for a better understanding of how the language and keymap installer selections impact the installed system. = enhancement recommendation = Recommend reviewing the release criteria to ensure expectations are captured around propagating language and keymap settings from install to desktop login (/etc/sysconfig/i18n, image:Package-x-generic-16.pnggdm etc...). It may also be advised to coordinate with the installer team so that bugs can be filed for any missing functionality. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/81> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 8

[Fedora QA] #61: make VirtioSerial Test cases clearer
by fedora-badges 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

#61: make VirtioSerial Test cases clearer ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: liam | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- we have VirtioSerial Test cases here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-04-08_Virtualization_VirtioSer… but during test day, none of these cases was executed. I think testers did not know how to run these cases, so Amit, could you like to rewrite these cases with template and make it clearer? The good cases can help make VirtioSerial better and better,it also can involve more fedora people in virtio.Thanks in advance. These cases that are written with template for your reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_13_Install_Results_Template#Test_M… Or if you don't know how to use template, just write the test step more specific and send the cases to me, I will convert them to standard format. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/61> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #46: Write Test cases for LXDE components.
by fedora-badges 28 Jan '15

28 Jan '15

#46: Write Test cases for LXDE components. ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: johannbg | Owner: johannbg Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- An ticket to keep track on LXDE components that need test cases and how to debug pages * PCManFM: File manager, provides desktop icons * LXPanel: Feature-rich desktop panel * LXSession: Standard-compliant X11 session manager with shutdown/reboot/suspend support via HAL ( FEI https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/HalRemoval ) * LXSession-edit: GUI to configure what’s automatically started in LXDE * lxde-settings-daemon: XSettings Daemon * LXInput: Keyboard and mouse settings dialog * LXRandR: Configuration tool for monitors and external projectors * LXAppearance: Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher able to change GTK+ themes, icon themes, and fonts * LXTask: Lightweight task manager derived from xfce4 task manager * LXTerminal: Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator * LXLauncher: Open source replacement for the Asus Launcher on the EeePC * LXShortcut: Small utility to edit application shortcuts, used by lxpanel and lxlauncher * LXNM (still under development): Lightweight network manager for LXDE supporting wireless connections (not yet in Fedora ) * LXRandR (still under development): Monitor configuring tool * Openbox: Lightweight, standard-compliant, and highly-configurable window manager. * GPicView: A very simple, fast, and lightweight image viewer featuring immediate startup * Leafpad: Lightweight and simple text editor * XArchiver: Lightweight, fast, and desktop-independent gtk+-based file archiver * LXDM: Display manager -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/46> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 7

slow mirror workaround?
by Felix Miata 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Trying to yum upgrade 19 is stuck on a mirror with no useful throughput. What kind of workaround for this is available? Nothing jumps at me in the yum man page. How do I specify to use a particular mirror know to work? -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/

6 8

[Fedora QA] #278: Joining the proven testers
by fedora-badges 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

#278: Joining the proven testers -----------------------------------------+------------------ Reporter: aravindv | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------------------+------------------ I am Aravind vijayan, i wish to join with proven testers i have a little experience with bug-triaging in bugzilla,I request you to give me a chance to join with you and do something more. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/278> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #309: Request to join proven testers.
by fedora-badges 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

#309: Request to join proven testers. -----------------------------------------+------------------ Reporter: vicodan | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------------------+------------------ Hi, I'd like to join the proven testers group. I joined the QA/triagers team in January 2012. Since then I have become a member of the packagers, ambassadors and free media groups. At the present time I am packaging MATE Desktop, a feature of F18. I know how to use bodhi, koji, rpmlint, rpmbuild quite well already and have done a few package reviews already. I looked at other people's tickets here and will know fedora-easy-karma by tomorrow. Already played with it. fas: vicodan name: Dan Mashal email: dan.mashal(a)fedoraproject.org -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/309> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #299: Proven tester mentor request
by fedora-badges 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

#299: Proven tester mentor request -----------------------------------------+------------------ Reporter: puiterwijk | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------------------+------------------ I would like to join proven testers, and will need a mentor for this. I am running Fedora Rawhide in a virtual machine, and plan to help testing it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/299> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #298: Proventester Mentor Request
by fedora-badges 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

#298: Proventester Mentor Request -----------------------------------------+------------------ Reporter: akshayvyas29 | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------------------+------------------ HI My name is Akshay. I want to join proventesters. I have a lot of linux experience (four years). I am arleady in bugzappers group. I really want to join, because I love testing and i think i will be very active member, but I need sponsor first. Unfortunately, I have no recommendation as I am young member of Fedora project. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/298> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test June 2013