test April 2015

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

73 participants
235 discussions

NVIDIA Question
by David St.Clair 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

This may be a dumb question, but why can't Redhat distribute NVIDIA binary drivers? In NVIDIA's licence (http://www.nvidia.com/object/nv_swlicense.html) it says: "2.1.2 Linux Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of Section 2.1.1, SOFTWARE designed exclusively for use on the Linux operating system may be copied and redistributed, provided that the binary files thereof are not modified in any way (except for unzipping of compressed files)." So, what's keeping RedHat from putting the drivers in the distribution? If it's a GPL thing, would it be easy to just download it during installation or at least give the option to the user? Thanks, -- David St.Clair dstclair(a)cs.wcu.edu

10 20

Mouse goes crazy
by Jonathan Villa 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

Ok, I have had Yarrow working well for a while now, but yesterday I started experiencing some odd issues with my mouse. All of a sudden it stops working correctly. The only thing that seems to fix is to kill X and run mouse-test, then restart. Any ideas? Also, I have FC 1 running on a desktop which is hooked up to a KVM switch. Whenever I go to another PC, and return, the same thing happens, the mouse goes crazy. ???

8 7

Re: digikam and kipi-plugins?
by Rex Dieter 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

Per Bothner wrote: > The Rawhide version of digikam is the very latest (0.10.0-rc1), > but it fails to find any of the "Kipi plugins", even though I've > installed the kipi-plugins package. This might be an upstream > issue, since 0.10.0 is pretty bleeding edge and the kipi-plugins > may even more bleeding-edge. Gwenview does seem to be see the > plugins, so I'm wondering if there is there might be a > Fedora-specific problem before I complain upstream ... The f10 builds seem to work fine for me (finding the plugins), so perhaps this is rawhide-specific? To be clear, digikam's Settings -> configure digikam -> Kipi Plugins is empty? -- Rex

2 1

Re: rawhide report: 20050419 changes
by Ray Strode 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

Hi, > Will yelp in FC4 be able to search and display man/info pages Yea, man and info pages work for me. --Ray

2 2

Mouse Wheel gone
by Christian Menzel 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

Since the latest xorg-X11 upgrade I receive the already mentioned XKB error and the mouse wheel is not working anymore. Has anybody seen this behavior? Regards Chris

3 3

Re: NFS failure
by Fulko.Hew＠sita.aero 22 Nov '15

22 Nov '15

Damian Menscher <menscher(a)uiuc.edu>@redhat.com on 04/07/2004 04:57:13 PM wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Jeff Elkins wrote: > > > I'm getting failure messages on my nfs mounts i.e. : > > > > mount to NFS server 'music.elkins' failed: server is down. > > > > nsfd appears to be running and I didn't see anything suspicious in the logs. > > The servers are up and running and have other clients connected. > > You didn't mention what steps you took to debug it: > > Can you ping the server? > What is the output of rpcinfo -p servername? > Does the server have access restrictions (firewall, TCP Wrappers, etc)? I have the same symptoms... rpcinfo says that nfs et.al. are running. Something has changed in test 2, since the same PC running RH9 accesses that host just fine.

7 9

[Fedora QA] #469: Proposed Test Day - Cloud/Atomic Test Day
by fedora-badges 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

#469: Proposed Test Day - Cloud/Atomic Test Day -----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: dustymabe | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------+------------------------ We will be testing the Fedora 22 Cloud and Atomic images on May 7th. The following pages will be updated with more information as it comes along: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-05-07_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-05-07_Atomic -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/469> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #467: DNF Migration: Rolekit Testing
by fedora-badges 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

#467: DNF Migration: Rolekit Testing ---------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Trac | Version: Keywords: dnf_migration | Blocked By: Blocking: | ---------------------------+------------------------ Rolekit utilizes yum for deploying it's roles (which is currently limited to domain controller and database), which means it needs to get ported to dnf and tested. Hopefully a majority of the testing will fall under general release validation testing, but we need someone to track this testing effort for F22. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/467> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #466: DNF Migration: Software Center and Apper
by fedora-badges 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

#466: DNF Migration: Software Center and Apper ---------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Trac | Version: Keywords: dnf_migration | Blocked By: Blocking: | ---------------------------+------------------------ Software Center and Apper both use the same backend tools yum uses. While this doesn't strictly fall under the umbrella of the DNF migration - we need someone to keep an eye on these tools and ensure they work. It would probably be good to have two people handle this, one for Software Center and one for Apper. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/466> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 9

[Fedora QA] #465: DNF Migration: FedUp Testing
by fedora-badges 02 Jun '15

02 Jun '15

#465: DNF Migration: FedUp Testing ---------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Trac | Version: Keywords: dnf_migration | Blocked By: Blocking: | ---------------------------+------------------------ We'll need testing of F20 to F22 upgrades. Both have different installed package sets due to utilizing different depsolvers which could potentially cause issues with upgrades. We need someone to handle the testing effort for FedUp going forward - this will likely require more testing during the F23 cycle than the F22 cycle. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/465> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test April 2015