August 2015 - test - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Criteria proposal: remove media part of release notes criterion

by Adam Williamson

Per https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/471 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221920 , it seems we no longer want to require release notes to be present on all media. For simplicity's sake, I suggest we simply remove the media section of the criterion entirely. We could I suppose require that media include some kind of pointer to the release notes, but this seems difficult in the case of e.g. cloud images. Anyone have comments, alternative proposals? Thanks! For the record, the criterion is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_ 23_Final_Release_Criteria#Release_notes : "The final branded release notes must be present on release-blocking images and the appropriately versioned generic release notes must be available in the release repository." I propose amending it to: "The final branded and generic release notes must be present in the release repository." -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

2 years

3
10
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #472: create testcase for resizing in custom partitioning

by fedora-badges

#472: create testcase for resizing in custom partitioning ------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: kparal | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Test cases | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ------------------------+------------------------ After discovering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221247 it seems reasonable we should test this more properly in the future. Currently we seem to have no test case about resizing partitions in manual part dialog. We probably should, and test it against at least a standard partition and a logical volume. Optionally, we can split standard partitions into ext4 and ntfs, to cover similar use cases as in our QA:Testcase_partitioning_guided_shrink . -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/472> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

3 years, 3 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #478: Proposed Test Day: Cloud

by fedora-badges

#478: Proposed Test Day: Cloud ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: roshi | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ It would be good to have a test day for the cloud image. The Cloud WG will coordinate and host. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/478> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

3 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #476: Proposed Test Day - Cinnamon Spin

by fedora-badges

#476: Proposed Test Day - Cinnamon Spin ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: grinnz | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ It would be awesome if the QA team could setup a test day for the new Cinnamon spin. I don't have a preference on the date. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Cinnamon_Spin -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/476> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

3 years, 9 months

4
14
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #474: Proposed Test Day - i18n

by fedora-badges

#474: Proposed Test Day - i18n ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: tagoh | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ After discussing the schedule of i18n test day in the fedora i18n meeting yesterday, we have agreed to have it 1st of September. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/474> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

3 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

Re: digikam and kipi-plugins?

by Rex Dieter

Per Bothner wrote: > The Rawhide version of digikam is the very latest (0.10.0-rc1), > but it fails to find any of the "Kipi plugins", even though I've > installed the kipi-plugins package. This might be an upstream > issue, since 0.10.0 is pretty bleeding edge and the kipi-plugins > may even more bleeding-edge. Gwenview does seem to be see the > plugins, so I'm wondering if there is there might be a > Fedora-specific problem before I complain upstream ... The f10 builds seem to work fine for me (finding the plugins), so perhaps this is rawhide-specific? To be clear, digikam's Settings -> configure digikam -> Kipi Plugins is empty? -- Rex

3 years, 12 months

2
1
0 / 0

Re: rawhide report: 20050419 changes

by Ray Strode

Hi, > Will yelp in FC4 be able to search and display man/info pages Yea, man and info pages work for me. --Ray

3 years, 12 months

2
2
0 / 0

Mouse Wheel gone

by Christian Menzel

Since the latest xorg-X11 upgrade I receive the already mentioned XKB error and the mouse wheel is not working anymore. Has anybody seen this behavior? Regards Chris

3 years, 12 months

3
3
0 / 0

Re: NFS failure

by Fulko.Hew＠sita.aero

Damian Menscher <menscher(a)uiuc.edu>@redhat.com on 04/07/2004 04:57:13 PM wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Jeff Elkins wrote: > > > I'm getting failure messages on my nfs mounts i.e. : > > > > mount to NFS server 'music.elkins' failed: server is down. > > > > nsfd appears to be running and I didn't see anything suspicious in the logs. > > The servers are up and running and have other clients connected. > > You didn't mention what steps you took to debug it: > > Can you ping the server? > What is the output of rpcinfo -p servername? > Does the server have access restrictions (firewall, TCP Wrappers, etc)? I have the same symptoms... rpcinfo says that nfs et.al. are running. Something has changed in test 2, since the same PC running RH9 accesses that host just fine.

3 years, 12 months

7
9
0 / 0

[Fedora QA] #473: Fedora 23 Translation (L10n) Test Day

by fedora-badges

#473: Fedora 23 Translation (L10n) Test Day --------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: anipeter | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23 Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: l10n | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+------------------------ Translation (L10n) Test Day for Fedora 23 has to be finalized. Software Translation Deadline : 25th August (Tuesday) and[[BR]] Fedora 23 Alpha release : 11th August (Tuesday) As per discussion on email [1], we can finalize the L10n test day for F23 on 18th August (Tuesday), thus translators will have one week to review and fix their translations. FLTG team will be working towards coordinating and arranging the test day including creating new test cases, reviewing old test cases, redesign test page, provide required assistance to get the image for testing, help testers on test day etc. Thanks Ani Peter (apeter)[[BR]] FLTG[[BR]] [1] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fltg/2015-July/000290.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/473> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

4 years

1
13
0 / 0

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test August 2015