Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Whether it should or not, the failure I had with it illustrates my point very nicely.
Sure. That is why I said "should". Bugs happen.
There's not much evidence. System booted without "quiet rhgb." No trace that I can see of the failed boot (no /var/log/dmesg from it).
This is the kernel: 2.6.24.1-28.fc9
If someone gave me a bug report like that, it wouldn't be high on my priorities.
It is useful filing it anyway. If others can reproduce the problem, then we can confirm your observation.
I'll see about it when my existing report against 2.6.25 is fixed. Until then I'm running an obsolete kernel and it's really not worth bothering with if it's gone away, magically or otherwise.