On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
That's the question though - is it required? I thought the test case would
be marked as optional. We already require FMW in "Default boot and install"
matrix, so Fedora is covered (we just don't know *what* Fedora they used
for that). And are any FMW crashes on Win/macOS blocking? I don't think we
have a criterion for that (the question is whether we should).
So as long as we keep that table optional, I think it's useful to split
out the Fedora version, so that we clearly see what people tried and what
they didn't. Also, for the same reason it would probably help to see
Windows 7 and Windows 10 separated.
But if we want to mark it as required, I wouldn't want yet another
exploded matrix, and I agree Fedora 26 could be left out (and Windows
merged together).
I figured it wouldn't hurt if I add the table marked as optional:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInstallation_test_...
We can now continue discussing how we want it to look like, but at least
it's there already.
As a footnote, I hardcoded Fedora 24/25/26 numbers, because I wasn't sure
how to do that better. I can use a template, but I don't want the numbers
to change once it is converted to a standard install matrix, and I'm not
sure what method relval uses to do so. (So this is mainly a question for
Adam, whether we can use templates in there or not).