Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 26 October 2006 07:14, Neal Becker wrote:
> There is IMHO a _serious_ issue here. The update hangs for a _very_ long
> time with no user feedback that it isn't dead. This is on a very fast
> machine with lots of memory.
>
> Believe me - there about to be a flood of complaints about this. I can't
> wait to see what happens when someone with a more modest machine tries
> this.
And I don't see any fix for this in any reasonable amount of time. Dep
resolving and transaction testing a 2000~ package update is going to take
a
while. Plain and simple.
If there was some better visual feedback to tell the user it's not dead,
that would be a big help.