Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Kernel messages? Before RHGB starts?
These are not relevant to RHGB. If anything happens before RHGB even starts, users would see it anyway.
The subject says "quiet."
Quiet should have no effect on rawhide.
Whether it should or not, the failure I had with it illustrates my point very nicely.
Wanna come round and sort it out?
Nope. File a bug report.
Didn't think you would.
There's not much evidence. System booted without "quiet rhgb." No trace that I can see of the failed boot (no /var/log/dmesg from it).
This is the kernel: 2.6.24.1-28.fc9
If someone gave me a bug report like that, it wouldn't be high on my priorities. Little info, nobody _should_ be using it....