Hey Adam

Sorry for the confusion, what Parth meant is that I am helping him onboard. Although I was too taken aback by Pavlo's response where he talked about (RH employed ) people. Maybe because, we didn't reply to every single introduction mail.

hence my reply went as

-snipped-
Hey Paul

Actually , we are very much interested in having people onboard and as proposed we will have a onboarding session very soon(1-2 weeks) . We are in the process of having the rest of the Fedora QA article series out too.

A poll for timing will be out by tomorrow morning , so you can stick around and we will help you out!

Should you have any issues, feel free to reach out with me. Maybe we don't respond of each of the introduction emails, doesn't mean we are not interested in helping out new contributors.


This pretty much solved the confusion.


Thanks
Sumantro


On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 21:20 +0300, Pavlo Rudyi wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 20:23 +0530, Parth Oberoi wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > My name is Parth Oberoi and was interested in contributing to Fedora.
> > I am in contact with Sumantro who is helping us onboard.
>
> Hello Parth, the major QA Group people (RH employed) doesn't interested
> in onboard session - no constructive suggestions. Sadly but true. 

Er, sorry? Sumantro (who proposed and is organizing the onboarding
session) is an RH intern.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net



--
Sumantro Mukherjee
 
ReMo at Mozilla
TechNet Wiki Microsoft Ninja(Windows 10 App Dev)
Microsoft Specialist
Lead at JUG ,Kolkata fb.com/javaugk
App Reviewer, Firefox OS Marketplace 
http://mozillians.org/en-US/u/SumantroMukherjee/
Executive at C# Corner,Kolkata
CISE,RHCE,MCTS,MCP,MS,CCNA,CCNP