What if we replaced the "10 seconds" with something like "reasonably
fast".
With different machines people could have different expectations, so
somebody could consider 10 seconds a long time, while others could take 20
for normal.
This could make more room for usual experience and expectations.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:13 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> But I also missed his announcement, and when this discussion was
renewed, I thought the criterion still wasn't finalized and in effect. It
seems I wasn't the only one :o)
>
I also forgot that I had done it when the discussion picked back up.
But yeah, I'm definitely flexible on the timing. I think the reason we
went with a number was to avoid getting bogged down in what
"reasonable" meant. But the existing criterion has its own ambiguity,
so if we can make it better*, we should.
* But what does "better" mean?! :-D
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Lukáš Růžička
FEDORA QE, RHCE
Red Hat
<
https://www.redhat.com>
Purkyňova 115
612 45 Brno - Královo Pole
lruzicka(a)redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. <
https://redhat.com/trusted>