Greetings!
I know many of you have had problems installing FC6t3. Let me offer my apologies, and my sincere thanks to you for *trying* to help us test Fedora Core.
We still want your help! In order to make that happen, we've decided to do an early release of pre-FC6 disk images. They will only be available by bittorrent, in order to save us time waiting for the mirrors to sync.
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
...and others.
We'll make an announcement when the images actually become available. Let me know if there are any questions.
-w
Le jeudi 28 septembre 2006 à 22:05 +0000, Will Woods a écrit :
Greetings!
I know many of you have had problems installing FC6t3. Let me offer my apologies, and my sincere thanks to you for *trying* to help us test Fedora Core.
We still want your help! In order to make that happen, we've decided to do an early release of pre-FC6 disk images. They will only be available by bittorrent, in order to save us time waiting for the mirrors to sync.
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
...and others.
We'll make an announcement when the images actually become available. Let me know if there are any questions.
-w
Thanks !
Then Fedora Core 6 is going to be delayed ?
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 00:10 +0200, Thomas Canniot wrote:
Then Fedora Core 6 is going to be delayed ?
Our intent is to have as minimal of a schedule impact as we can -- basically, we're going to keep with the overall freeze schedule (Monday) and handle release blocker quality bugs as they come in. But at the same time, we want to do what we can to ensure a high quality release
Jeremy
thank you very much! (what about showing the installation size? :) )
On 9/29/06, Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 00:10 +0200, Thomas Canniot wrote:
Then Fedora Core 6 is going to be delayed ?
Our intent is to have as minimal of a schedule impact as we can -- basically, we're going to keep with the overall freeze schedule (Monday) and handle release blocker quality bugs as they come in. But at the same time, we want to do what we can to ensure a high quality release
Jeremy
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Will Woods wrote:
Greetings!
I know many of you have had problems installing FC6t3. Let me offer my apologies, and my sincere thanks to you for *trying* to help us test Fedora Core.
We still want your help! In order to make that happen, we've decided to do an early release of pre-FC6 disk images. They will only be available by bittorrent, in order to save us time waiting for the mirrors to sync.
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
...and others.
We'll make an announcement when the images actually become available. Let me know if there are any questions.
How about extras repo installation bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206352 ?
Rahul
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
How about extras repo installation bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206352 ?
Yes. Using external repos from CD/DVD method installations wasn't expected to work with Test3, but Jeremy got it working for the psuedo Test4. Should actually be fixed in tomorrow's rawhide. In fact, as we fix these bugs, rawhide should be suitable for testing them (unless the bug was directly effected by media installs)
Jesse Keating Wrote:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
How about extras repo installation bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206352 ?
Yes. Using external repos from CD/DVD method installations wasn't expected to work with Test3, but Jeremy got it working for the psuedo Test4. Should actually be fixed in tomorrow's rawhide. In fact, as we fix these bugs, rawhide should be suitable for testing them (unless the bug was directly effected by media installs)
So just to be clear, there is no sense downloading the iso's to do a network install, if I have a current rawhide tree to install from?
I have a laptop I want to try to install on this weekend. :-)
Regards,
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:25, Tom Diehl wrote:
So just to be clear, there is no sense downloading the iso's to do a network install, if I have a current rawhide tree to install from?
I have a laptop I want to try to install on this weekend. :-)
Correct. In fact, rawhide may be slightly newer than the FC6 Pre isos.
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 22:05 +0000, Will Woods wrote:
Greetings!
I know many of you have had problems installing FC6t3. Let me offer my apologies, and my sincere thanks to you for *trying* to help us test Fedora Core.
We still want your help! In order to make that happen, we've decided to do an early release of pre-FC6 disk images. They will only be available by bittorrent, in order to save us time waiting for the mirrors to sync.
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
...and others.
We'll make an announcement when the images actually become available. Let me know if there are any questions.
Thanks!
I'll download them and give'em a change later this week-end.
- Gilboa
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:05, Will Woods wrote:
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
Assuming that today's development (20060929) is more or less the same as test4, it looks very good. I just completed an NFS install on an x86_64 system and everything seemed to work OK (much better than fc6t3) ... well, except for a small problem with keyboard entry during firstboot ... I will bugzilla that if it has not been already reported.
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 14:32 -0400, Gene C. wrote:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:05, Will Woods wrote:
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
Assuming that today's development (20060929) is more or less the same as test4, it looks very good. I just completed an NFS install on an x86_64 system and everything seemed to work OK (much better than fc6t3) ... well, except for a small problem with keyboard entry during firstboot ... I will bugzilla that if it has not been already reported. -- Gene
I also had no keyboard for firstboot on a rawhide install I did on Monday. When you bugzilla it, could your report it here?
Thanks,
tjb
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:50, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:35, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
I also had no keyboard for firstboot on a rawhide install I did on Monday. When you bugzilla it, could your report it here?
This is already being worked on.
yes ... but has been drilled into me: if it not in bugzilla, there is no problem.
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:35, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
I also had no keyboard for firstboot on a rawhide install I did on Monday. When you bugzilla it, could your report it here?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208620
workaround posted to not use rhgb for your first bootup.
Will Woods <wwoods <at> redhat.com> writes:
Greetings!
I know many of you have had problems installing FC6t3. Let me offer my apologies, and my sincere thanks to you for *trying* to help us test Fedora Core.
We still want your help! In order to make that happen, we've decided to do an early release of pre-FC6 disk images. They will only be available by bittorrent, in order to save us time waiting for the mirrors to sync.
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
...and others.
We'll make an announcement when the images actually become available. Let me know if there are any questions.
-w
Will,
I appologize for bothering you but I'm trying to do some testing on my newly kickstarted fc6t3 system. I went to the repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo and changed enabled=0 to enabled=1. All I get is an error (see below) when I do yum update. I've been searching for the solution to this and it's how I found this posting.
Did I do something wrong? Does your writing apply to me? Should I just cool my heels?
Regards and THANKS for your time spent dealing with this email.
George...
[root@fndn-bld-system7 yum.repos.d]# uname -a Linux fndn-bld-system7.cisco.com 2.6.18-1.2741.fc6xen #1 SMP Wed Oct 4 21:01:55 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@fndn-bld-system7 yum.repos.d]# yum update Loading "protectbase" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading "changelog" plugin Loading "kernel-module" plugin Plugin "downloadonly" uses deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE. Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead. Loading "downloadonly" plugin Plugin "allowdowngrade" uses deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE. Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead. Loading "allowdowngrade" plugin Loading "skip-broken" plugin Plugin "tsflags" uses deprecated constant TYPE_INTERFACE. Please use TYPE_INTERACTIVE instead. Loading "tsflags" plugin Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "fedorakmod" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://fedora.redhat.com/Download/mirrors/updates-testing-fc5.92 error was [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:54:32 GMT Server: Apache Last-Modified: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:45:36 GMT ETag: "109caa-105b-452706c0" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 4187 Content-Type: text/html
Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: updates-testing
George R. Goffe wrote:
Will Woods <wwoods <at> redhat.com> writes:
Greetings!
I know many of you have had problems installing FC6t3. Let me offer my apologies, and my sincere thanks to you for *trying* to help us test Fedora Core.
We still want your help! In order to make that happen, we've decided to do an early release of pre-FC6 disk images. They will only be available by bittorrent, in order to save us time waiting for the mirrors to sync.
This release should fix the most common bugs preventing installation of FC6t3, including:
#206913: Anaconda exception on upgrade from FC4 #206876: GRUB claims initrd is too big for memory on x86_64 #208080: ahci/ata_piix mixup causes Anaconda to not find SATA disks #206453: installed x86_64/ppc system missing initrd, cannot boot #206202: Anaconda traceback during lvcreate on ppc64
...and others.
We'll make an announcement when the images actually become available. Let me know if there are any questions.
-w
Will,
I appologize for bothering you but I'm trying to do some testing on my newly kickstarted fc6t3 system. I went to the repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo and changed enabled=0 to enabled=1. All I get is an error (see below) when I do yum update. I've been searching for the solution to this and it's how I found this posting.
Fedora updates testing is useless on a development branch/test releases and wont work. That repository is used for testing updates that are scheduled for general releases. You only need fedora-devel and extras-devel repositories enabled in the development branch/test releases to participate in testing.
Rahul
Rahul
George R. Goffe wrote:
I appologize for bothering you but I'm trying to do some testing on my newly kickstarted fc6t3 system. I went to the repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo and changed enabled=0 to enabled=1. All I get is an error (see below) when I do yum update. I've been searching for the solution to this and it's how I found this posting.
Did I do something wrong? Does your writing apply to me? Should I just cool my heels?
Not quite sure what you're trying to do George, but if you want to run rawhide, just enable fedora-development.repo and fedora-extras-development.repo, then run yum update.
If, on the other hand, you're trying to acquire the FC6 prerelease, it's available by bittorrent. http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
Jay
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 21:17 -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
George R. Goffe wrote:
I appologize for bothering you but I'm trying to do some testing on my newly kickstarted fc6t3 system. I went to the repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo and changed enabled=0 to enabled=1. All I get is an error (see below) when I do yum update. I've been searching for the solution to this and it's how I found this posting.
Did I do something wrong? Does your writing apply to me? Should I just cool my heels?
Not quite sure what you're trying to do George, but if you want to run rawhide, just enable fedora-development.repo and fedora-extras-development.repo, then run yum update.
If, on the other hand, you're trying to acquire the FC6 prerelease, it's available by bittorrent. http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
After getting FC6 preRelease about two weeks ago, I have been running pup and I get now updates. yum also shows no available updates.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Ernesto
Jay
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 21:17 -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
George R. Goffe wrote:
I appologize for bothering you but I'm trying to do some testing on my newly kickstarted fc6t3 system. I went to the repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates-testing.repo and changed enabled=0 to enabled=1. All I get is an error (see below) when I do yum update. I've been searching for the solution to this and it's how I found this posting.
Did I do something wrong? Does your writing apply to me? Should I just cool my heels?
Not quite sure what you're trying to do George, but if you want to run rawhide, just enable fedora-development.repo and fedora-extras-development.repo, then run yum update.
If, on the other hand, you're trying to acquire the FC6 prerelease, it's available by bittorrent. http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
After getting FC6 preRelease about two weeks ago, I have been running pup and I get now updates. yum also shows no available updates.
What is the official release date for FC6? I saw October 17th on the web site, but it did not list RC1, so I don't know if I should believe it.
Is that the official date or has it slipped?
It should have been Friday the 13th.
On Saturday 14 October 2006 17:03, alan wrote:
What is the official release date for FC6? I saw October 17th on the web site, but it did not list RC1, so I don't know if I should believe it.
Is that the official date or has it slipped?
The schedule page is always the 'official' date. However the date is subject to change up until the release actually happens. 'RC1' as you call it, or Pre as we call it was unplanned and thus was not on the schedule.