8 -> 9
by Paul W. Frields
I found four spots in the release notes where we failed to capture
"Fedora 8" and replace it with "Fedora 9." If I make this change, it
adds 4 fuzzy strings. Do translators want me to worry about this now,
or make more fuzzy strings after we collect the PO files on 31-March?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
16 years, 1 month
Per language module assignement and overview
by Adam Pribyl
Is in transifex something like was on elvis - a way how translators can
assign/reserve modules for them to translate? If there is more people
working on translations, then this was really usefull.
I'd also welcome if on the module translation overview page is visible,
who, and when last time, the module was translated.
BTW: How often is the statistic overview updated? Would it be possible to
update module language statistic when the translation is submited?
Adam Pribyl
16 years, 1 month
freeze break: initscripts
by Bill Nottingham
Because I screwed up, the initscripts translatable strings have not
been updated for Fedora 9. I'd like to do that now.
The average fully translated locale will end up with ~108 fuzzies
to clean up and 15 newly untranslated strings; diffstat of the changes
yields 123 insertions and 87 removals.
OK to commit?
Bill
16 years, 1 month
FLP Meeting 2008-03-18 IRC log
by Dimitris Glezos
Mar 18 21:04:21 * glezos has changed the topic to: Fedora Localization
Group meeting -- Agenda:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Meetings#agenda -- Init
Mar 18 21:04:23 glezos <meeting>
Mar 18 21:04:26 glezos yo all, who's here?
Mar 18 21:04:27 * Rasther
(n=diego(a)200-101-234-68.fnsce7003.e.brasiltelecom.net.br) has joined
#fedora-meeting
Mar 18 21:04:38 * marek @ Marek Mahut (sk)
Mar 18 21:04:43 glezos Dimitris Glezos (el)
Mar 18 21:04:49 * noriko @ Noriko Mizumoto (ja)
Mar 18 21:05:03 * vpv Ville-Pekka Vainio (fi)
Mar 18 21:05:05 runa_b Runa Bhattacharjee (bn_IN)
Mar 18 21:05:19 Rasther Diego Búrigo Zacarão (pt_BR)
Mar 18 21:06:01 * pygi (n=mario(a)193.198.164.174) has joined #fedora-meeting
Mar 18 21:06:17 glezos awesome
Mar 18 21:06:28 glezos Let's get it going for some people to go to
sleep and some others to get back to work. :-)
Mar 18 21:06:29 pygi hello folks
Mar 18 21:06:31 glezos Agenda:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/2008-March/msg00076.html
Mar 18 21:06:33 glezos Oops
Mar 18 21:06:41 glezos Agenda:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Meetings#agenda
Mar 18 21:07:37 glezos here's the summary from the previous meeting,
generated from kindly donated brain nerve activity from runa_b :
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/2008-March/msg00076.html
Mar 18 21:07:48 runa_b :)
Mar 18 21:07:57 glezos From the action items:
Mar 18 21:08:10 glezos String freeze announcement was sent to
-devel-announce from me
Mar 18 21:08:28 glezos MrTom did send the suggestions (almost all of
them were very good ones)
Mar 18 21:08:52 glezos Rasther: How do you feel about them? Would you
like to get the ball rolling with them?
Mar 18 21:09:11 * couf Bart Couvreur (nl)
Mar 18 21:10:33 glezos FWIW, I can help out with some of them.
Mar 18 21:10:34 ln- oh, i was here already.
Mar 18 21:10:34 Rasther Good suggestions... And I would like to help
mainly with Tx i18n
Mar 18 21:11:11 glezos Most of them require editing the
templates/view, so it's a low-hanging fruit for anyone who'd like to
help a bit with Transifex development
Mar 18 21:11:41 glezos The last 2 actions were done, as runa pointed
out already.
Mar 18 21:11:51 glezos we can talk a bit about FLSCo later on.
Mar 18 21:12:18 glezos Anything else on these?
Mar 18 21:12:24 Rasther glezos: I'll take a look on it...
Mar 18 21:12:34 glezos Rasther: right on!
Mar 18 21:12:41 Rasther about templates/view...
Mar 18 21:13:04 * glezos has changed the topic to: Fedora Localization
Group meeting -- Agenda:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Meetings#agenda -- Topic:
Statistics, Transifex update
Mar 18 21:13:26 glezos Lots of stuff on this front, there were some
major updates on FAS2 and the server Tx is running on
Mar 18 21:13:55 glezos I was caught up with my job so I didn't have
time to make sure everything was working flawlessly
Mar 18 21:14:23 couf general reminder for those how haven't done so:
change your FAS2 password or get locked out
Mar 18 21:14:35 couf s/how/who
Mar 18 21:15:01 glezos We know that if something breaks lots of people
can't do their jobs, so in the future we're aiming in more testing
Mar 18 21:15:15 glezos Meanwhile, you can always keep your work on
your local computer and upload when things are working.
Mar 18 21:16:19 glezos comments?
Mar 18 21:16:39 marek none from me
Mar 18 21:17:13 glezos great, since we've got a good discussion coming
about SCo and meeting time
Mar 18 21:17:17 * glezos has changed the topic to: Fedora Localization
Group meeting -- Agenda:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Meetings#agenda -- Steering
committee formation
Mar 18 21:17:46 glezos So, I'd really like everyone to provide as much
feedback as possible on the FLSCo ideas proposed. We NEED to have
consensus in this.
Mar 18 21:18:04 glezos Here's the current idea:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/SteeringCommittee
Mar 18 21:18:51 * runa_b quite liked the FLSCo draft
Mar 18 21:19:10 * marek likes it too, I don't see anything to change
Mar 18 21:19:21 * couf posted notes to list
Mar 18 21:19:22 glezos Q: 5 members or 7?
Mar 18 21:19:57 * marek is for 5.
Mar 18 21:20:04 pygi 5
Mar 18 21:20:19 runa_b glezos: how many members do we have in cvsl10n
Mar 18 21:20:39 marek I was about to ask that :)
Mar 18 21:20:45 runa_b :)
Mar 18 21:20:55 glezos from my experience with FDSCo, 7 people are
quite a few. However, with 5 people you can have a majority with just
3 people, while with 7 you need 4 (a bit harder to make wrong
decisions)
Mar 18 21:21:02 glezos We have ~400 people
Mar 18 21:21:14 runa_b whoa...i'd say 7 then
Mar 18 21:21:20 marek hm, you're right glezos
Mar 18 21:21:24 marek we're a big group
Mar 18 21:21:30 couf runa_b: +1
Mar 18 21:21:35 vpv we may have 400 translators, but how many is in
these meetings, 7-8?
Mar 18 21:21:37 marek let's go for 7
Mar 18 21:21:37 glezos Let's see, how many show up in meetnigs?
Mar 18 21:22:09 glezos oops, sorry, 280
Mar 18 21:22:30 runa_b glezos: vpv: well things like meetings tend to
be a little irregular in loosely structured groups..
Mar 18 21:22:52 runa_b but with a Sco in place it'll become more of a
standard practice
Mar 18 21:22:53 glezos cvsl10n has 280 members, not 400.
Mar 18 21:23:11 glezos runa_b: +1
Mar 18 21:23:15 runa_b glezos: i'd still stay with 7
Mar 18 21:23:31 marek +1
Mar 18 21:23:31 couf yeah, FDSCo is doing 7 with half the members in cvsdocs
Mar 18 21:23:33 glezos I lean more towards 7 as well.
Mar 18 21:23:46 glezos stickster: ping
Mar 18 21:23:51 * noriko votes to 7
Mar 18 21:24:41 Rasther maybe 7 (for 4 majority) is a good number...
Mar 18 21:24:51 glezos awesome.
Mar 18 21:25:00 couf decision: 7 members
Mar 18 21:25:08 glezos Yesterday I created the Elections page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/SteeringCommittee/Elections
Mar 18 21:25:14 * Southern_Gentlem
(n=notfred@unaffiliated/southerngentlem/x-2894754) has left
#fedora-meeting ("Leaving")
Mar 18 21:25:31 glezos So all, please subscribe to
L10N/SteeringCommittee/* on your wiki preferences page
Mar 18 21:25:38 glezos to get notified for changes
Mar 18 21:26:10 glezos one important thing to notice there is the
following, taken from FDSCo: The four top vote receivers serve on
FLSCo for 12 months, the next three vote receivers serve for 6 months.
Mar 18 21:27:21 couf hang on: that was a FDSCo decision to get it on
track, do we want that for this project?
Mar 18 21:27:50 glezos couf: yeah, that's something I'd like your input
Mar 18 21:27:51 runa_b glezos: we would require frequent elections if
we follow that method
Mar 18 21:28:29 glezos runa_b: do you think doing elections with every
release (6 months) is overkill?
Mar 18 21:28:38 * runa_b thinks so
Mar 18 21:28:40 couf I'd go with the new route: elections every six
months, and the only guy that stays is the chair (appointed for 12
months)
Mar 18 21:29:11 Rasther couf: +1
Mar 18 21:29:12 runa_b instead of months/years.. can we go for releases
Mar 18 21:29:18 glezos runa_b: yes, that's the idea
Mar 18 21:29:27 couf runa_b: that's basiclly the same :-)
Mar 18 21:29:28 marek or the opposite, 12 months for elections and
select the guy in chair for 6 months only?
Mar 18 21:29:43 marek ie, 2 guys from selected team
Mar 18 21:30:04 vpv I think 6 months should be fine. After all, if the
community wants to keep someone and that person wants to continue,
she/he can re-run...
Mar 18 21:30:19 glezos the question here is whether we need a 6-month
election cycle. Do we have enough people to justify a re-nomination
and re-election every release?
Mar 18 21:30:22 marek :) I think glezos will be in the chair for years ;)
Mar 18 21:30:23 couf was thinking about continuitiy and making it
possible for newcomers to join in frequently
Mar 18 21:30:32 * abadger1999 has quit (Connection timed out)
Mar 18 21:30:40 runa_b we might need a little stability in the initial phase
Mar 18 21:31:01 runa_b i'd say ...go for 2 releases (12 months) for
the entire Sco
Mar 18 21:31:04 Rasther an election for release is a good number
Mar 18 21:31:19 noriko 6 months may lower the bar for new comers ?
Mar 18 21:31:23 marek hm, I would go for 2 releases as well
Mar 18 21:31:45 marek noriko: they can be still active
Mar 18 21:32:01 vpv noriko: I think so too, or people who are afraid
of being too busy in the longer future
Mar 18 21:32:09 marek hmm
Mar 18 21:32:12 couf or go with the original proposal: 4 members 12
months, 3 members 6 months, election for the 3 seats, next election:
the whole board
Mar 18 21:32:26 marek couf: that's the best I think
Mar 18 21:32:31 runa_b couf: +1
Mar 18 21:32:35 couf that gives stability in the beginning + allowing
fresh blood enter
Mar 18 21:32:41 runa_b yup..
Mar 18 21:32:57 couf from then on every release: new board
Mar 18 21:33:15 couf and let the power to FLSCo to change if they
think it ought to be different
Mar 18 21:33:35 runa_b yeah. that would be best.
Mar 18 21:33:57 glezos I think that having the chance to get on board
new people that are very active every 6 months is a good thing. But
having everyone to re-nominate and everything is probably a waste of
time, since the people that are devoted to the project are pretty
clear.
Mar 18 21:34:31 vpv If we take the 4, 12 + 3, 6 approach, then the
people running won't get to decide how long they are in the Sco,
though
Mar 18 21:34:52 glezos vpv: every person has the right to say "I'll
serve only for 6 months"/.
Mar 18 21:35:04 couf vpv: they can re-nominate themselves
Mar 18 21:35:30 vpv ok
Mar 18 21:36:24 glezos So, 7 people get elected: the 4 most popular
can serve for 12 months, the rest will have the chance to re-nominate
themselves in 6 months, together with the rest of the people who'd
like to get active with the FLSCo
Mar 18 21:36:40 marek glezos: +1, that's it
Mar 18 21:36:41 glezos Who's +1, -1, and 0?
Mar 18 21:36:44 couf +1
Mar 18 21:36:47 runa_b +1
Mar 18 21:36:58 vpv +1, with "can serve for 12 months"
Mar 18 21:36:58 Rasther +1
Mar 18 21:37:25 couf yeah the "can serve" distinction is important
Mar 18 21:37:51 glezos "Each member commits to a minimum of one or two
full release cycles of active duty on the committee. Active members
need to attend meetings to remain active."
Mar 18 21:38:16 glezos ok, we might need to clearly mention this in
the charter anyway.
Mar 18 21:38:26 glezos noriko: what do you think?
Mar 18 21:39:05 noriko yp. +1
Mar 18 21:39:21 glezos awesome.
Mar 18 21:39:33 glezos Next Q about FLSCo: When are we having the elections?
Mar 18 21:39:52 marek shortly after the release?
Mar 18 21:39:52 glezos http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Schedule
Mar 18 21:39:56 Rasther after F9 Release
Mar 18 21:40:04 * madmetal_spyros
(n=madmetal(a)ppp089210041242.dsl.hol.gr) has joined #fedora-meeting
Mar 18 21:40:10 couf or after trans freeze?
Mar 18 21:40:19 runa_b glezos: btw.. is this decision final or do we
need further discussions on the mailing list
Mar 18 21:40:34 Rasther couf: maybe be a good idea
Mar 18 21:41:01 glezos How about starting the nomination period (7-10
days) on April 10
Mar 18 21:41:12 glezos And the elections on April 20?
Mar 18 21:41:37 glezos Or is this going to get too smudged with the
release process?
Mar 18 21:41:56 marek I think we should elect after release, with clear head.
Mar 18 21:41:57 runa_b i'd say wait until the release, +1 to marek
Mar 18 21:42:30 * abadger1999
(n=abadger1@conference/pycon/x-a4f41af8539451de) has joined
#fedora-meeting
Mar 18 21:42:38 vpv I think so too, especially with RC1 shipping on the 22nd
Mar 18 21:43:01 Rasther we need a period to elections as well, no?
Mar 18 21:43:11 glezos we need 1 week for nominations and 1 week for elections.
Mar 18 21:43:28 Rasther ah, ok!
Mar 18 21:44:51 glezos The release takes place on 29/4, and it might slip
Mar 18 21:44:51 couf nominaties: 7-13 April, 14 - 20 elections?
Mar 18 21:45:05 glezos That's 1.5 month from now.
Mar 18 21:46:21 glezos Is there any reason not to go for it like couf
suggests? What needs to be done? Write a nomination and in a week
login to the vote system and spend 5 seconds clicking.
Mar 18 21:46:33 * bpepple|lt has quit ("Ex-Chat")
Mar 18 21:48:23 runa_b glezos: thats 1 month from now
Mar 18 21:48:47 runa_b can we delay it by a week...
Mar 18 21:49:15 runa_b 14-20 nominations, 21-27 elections?
Mar 18 21:49:21 Rasther runa_b: why?
Mar 18 21:49:54 glezos runa_b: the release takes place on 29/4. If we
delay it, then we'll need to start the nomination period after 29/4
Mar 18 21:50:00 runa_b Rasther: not sure.. but perhaps it might be
better to have a little buffer on the drum-beating period
Mar 18 21:50:10 runa_b not everyone is aware of the new Sco just yet
Mar 18 21:50:20 glezos okey
Mar 18 21:50:24 couf runa_b: we'd be close to release
Mar 18 21:50:38 couf and that would mean infra freeze, as in no-go
Mar 18 21:50:39 runa_b when is translation freeze?
Mar 18 21:50:50 couf 7 April
Mar 18 21:51:07 * No5251
(n=No5251(a)dslb-084-057-187-156.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined
#fedora-meeting
Mar 18 21:51:09 runa_b oh.. /me did not know about the infra-freeze limitations
Mar 18 21:51:52 glezos OK. Since there is no clear consensus, I
suggest to do it the right way then.
Mar 18 21:51:58 glezos After release, that is.
Mar 18 21:52:15 glezos We can use the time to blog about it
Mar 18 21:52:16 runa_b hmm.. in that case couf's suggestion sounds
doable...we might just need to pump up the noise about the elections
Mar 18 21:52:54 glezos runa_b: +1 on both points. If we all blog about
it, then people will learn about it
Mar 18 21:53:12 glezos And also, we could have an email sent to all
cvsl10n-members letting them know.
Mar 18 21:53:49 Rasther so, +1 for couf proposal
Mar 18 21:53:59 runa_b what do the others think?
Mar 18 21:54:56 noriko +1 for couf
Mar 18 21:55:00 marek I'm also for it. +1
Mar 18 21:55:08 vpv it's a bit early, but then again why not, +1
Mar 18 21:55:16 * glezos raises couf to his shoulders
Mar 18 21:55:21 glezos go go couf
Mar 18 21:55:35 couf heh
Mar 18 21:55:39 marek :)
Mar 18 21:55:54 * GeroldKa (n=GeroldKa@fedora/geroldka) has joined
#fedora-meeting
Mar 18 21:56:01 runa_b :)
Mar 18 21:56:09 glezos ok, since there are no objections, we can go for it.
Mar 18 21:56:11 Rasther k
Mar 18 21:56:14 glezos I'm +1 for couf, FWIW
Mar 18 21:56:43 glezos So, action item for everyone: Make sure the SCo
pages are read by as many eyes as possible and corrected
Mar 18 21:56:50 glezos Blog about the upcoming elections
Mar 18 21:57:05 glezos and someone to send an email to the list with
the proposed dates.
Mar 18 21:57:40 * glezos ducks
Mar 18 21:57:54 couf ow well, I'll do it
Mar 18 21:58:00 runa_b :)
Mar 18 21:58:04 glezos okey.
Mar 18 21:58:05 glezos Next topic?
Mar 18 21:58:16 * glezos has changed the topic to: Fedora Localization
Group meeting -- Agenda:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Meetings#agenda -- FLP meeting time
Mar 18 21:58:40 glezos see:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/2008-March/msg00094.html
Mar 18 21:58:46 * madmetal_spyros
(n=madmetal(a)ppp089210041242.dsl.hol.gr) has left #fedora-meeting
("Leaving")
Mar 18 21:58:56 * runa_b proposes: 1100 UTC for the next meeting
Mar 18 21:58:59 glezos Votes for 11 UTC.
Mar 18 21:59:04 glezos 0
Mar 18 21:59:13 glezos (0 = don't mind)
Mar 18 21:59:53 glezos Um, I should probably make that more clear:
Let's all vote for the proposal for meetings to take place at 11 UTC.
:)
Mar 18 22:00:12 marek :)
Mar 18 22:00:14 marek 0
Mar 18 22:00:14 runa_b well.. atleast the next one.. we could see how
it works out
Mar 18 22:00:29 marek +1 for the next one, 0 for permanent change
Mar 18 22:00:37 glezos +1 for the next one, 0 for permanent change
Mar 18 22:00:45 couf idem ditto
Mar 18 22:00:57 * k0k (n=k0k@fedora/k0k) has joined #fedora-meeting
Mar 18 22:01:17 vpv +1 for the next one, permanently, I'm not sure
Mar 18 22:01:18 runa_b everyone +1-ing.. please do remember to turn
up. last time it was a no-show :P
Mar 18 22:01:27 marek :)
Mar 18 22:02:08 glezos noriko: I'm pretty sure you're a strong +1 for it...? :)
Mar 18 22:02:21 glezos Rasther: ?
Mar 18 22:02:24 noriko glezos, :-)
Mar 18 22:02:40 Rasther usually on 8:00AM i'm on the street going to the job,
Mar 18 22:02:59 Rasther but I can try it
Mar 18 22:03:30 glezos Rasther: would you prefer 1 hour earlier?
Mar 18 22:03:39 Rasther I work in another city...
Mar 18 22:03:54 * wolfy (n=lonewolf@fedora/wolfy) has joined #fedora-meeting
Mar 18 22:03:57 Rasther glezos: no.. later would be better
Mar 18 22:04:32 Rasther right now I'm at job...
Mar 18 22:04:50 runa_b these are times you wish the world was flat :)
Mar 18 22:04:52
glezos http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=3&day=1&year...
Mar 18 22:05:27 glezos oops,
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=4&day=1&year...
Mar 18 22:05:59 glezos ok, let's go for 11UTC and see.
Mar 18 22:06:05 * glezos has changed the topic to: Fedora Localization
Group meeting -- Agenda:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Meetings#agenda -- Open floor
Mar 18 22:06:11 Rasther many times I can attend the meeting at my job,
but as I'm on $timejob, sometimes I can't
Mar 18 22:06:32 glezos Rasther: ok, let us know how that works with
you and we can discuss it again.
Mar 18 22:06:42 glezos I guess +-1h might work for most of us.
Mar 18 22:06:43 glezos Any other business we need to discuss?
Mar 18 22:06:44 * wolfy (n=lonewolf@fedora/wolfy) has left
#fedora-meeting ("If I want your opinion, I'll ask you to fill out the
necessary forms.")
Mar 18 22:07:02 runa_b yup
Mar 18 22:07:05 * pygi could say a word or two about glagolitsa if
people are interested
Mar 18 22:07:11 runa_b the Fedora Weekly News
Mar 18 22:07:44 Rasther glezos: okz
Mar 18 22:07:51 runa_b pygi: please go ahead :)
Mar 18 22:08:01 pygi runa_b, you sure you don't want first?
Mar 18 22:08:04 pygi with FWN?
Mar 18 22:08:09 runa_b pygi: no worries..
Mar 18 22:08:24 pygi ok, so basically glagolitsa in it's current form
is just an idea
Mar 18 22:08:50 pygi it's web translation service, very much similar
to Rosetta, and it's supposed to be written using Turbogears
Mar 18 22:09:01 pygi to be in conjunction with other Fedora
infrastructure elements
Mar 18 22:09:31 pygi It's initial phase (the one that is subject to
SoC) should include:
Mar 18 22:10:06 pygi Projects registration, ability to do translations
on registered projects/versions, groups management, download
translations as po, and similar things required for basic operation
Mar 18 22:10:55 pygi it would be modeled in a way to support further
growth, including for example a plugin that might be written later to
support language packs for every app fedora has in repos
Mar 18 22:11:15 * bashohII has quit ("夢よりも現の鷹ぞ頼もしき")
Mar 18 22:11:16 pygi (that's subject to discussion with other fedora
comities and stuff, anyway)
Mar 18 22:11:35 * pygi thinks that's enough for now, now you ask questions :)
Mar 18 22:11:45 glezos pygi: sounds like a good set of ideas, we could
maybe discuss them after the meeting in #fedora-l10n.
Mar 18 22:12:10 glezos we would definitely like to have GSoC projects
working on L10n engineering!
Mar 18 22:13:17 glezos my concerns is how it will integrate with the
rest of our tools, but if noone has anything else to comment on this,
maybe we should go on to runa and close the meeting for now.
Mar 18 22:14:04 pygi glezos, it's meant to be a tool used by everyone,
with eventually fedora-specific plugins written
Mar 18 22:15:27 glezos pygi: sounds great, especially if you re-use
the work of other tools (Pootle, DL, Translate toolkit, Transifex)
Mar 18 22:15:43 glezos runa_b: would you like to go on with FWN? It's
getting pretty late.
Mar 18 22:15:51 runa_b :)
Mar 18 22:16:49 runa_b well.. last meeting it was proposed that we
contribute to FWN every fortnight
Mar 18 22:17:16 runa_b can we perhaps have any ideas for it and start doing it
Mar 18 22:18:41 couf it's basiclly following the mailing list and
creating a small summary
Mar 18 22:18:57 couf if you're interested contact thomas chung
Mar 18 22:19:20 runa_b oh ok. i'll check with mether maybe.. he's closer
Mar 18 22:19:30 rahul_b Rasther rdieter Renault ricky rsc runa_b rwmjones
Mar 18 22:19:38 runa_b we might definitely need to catch a few eyeballs
Mar 18 22:19:44 runa_b for the elections
Mar 18 22:19:47 glezos runa_b: it would be fantastic if you could work on this..
Mar 18 22:20:17 runa_b i don't mind as long as I can afford to allot time
Mar 18 22:20:40 marek well, I think Thomas is monitoring announce-list
and the message about elections will land there...
Mar 18 22:21:30 runa_b ok.. perhaps we can continue about this on the
mailing list
Mar 18 22:21:51 glezos runa_b: I'm sure if you can't do a week's FWN,
sending an email to -trans-list could trigger me or couf jumping right
in.
Mar 18 22:22:06 runa_b :)
Mar 18 22:22:19 runa_b i am sure there would be more names too...
Mar 18 22:22:23 runa_b :)
Mar 18 22:23:31 couf okay, anything else, before closing?
Mar 18 22:24:15 Rasther +1 for 5...
Mar 18 22:24:18 Rasther 4...
Mar 18 22:24:28 glezos </meeting>
Mar 18 22:24:35 glezos thanks all
Mar 18 22:24:37 runa_b Thanks everyone
Mar 18 22:24:38 marek thanks all
Mar 18 22:24:44 glezos See you on 1/4 11 UTC
Mar 18 22:24:46 couf thanks all
Mar 18 22:24:52 Rasther thanks all
Mar 18 22:24:55 glezos Notice the time change for Summe!.
Mar 18 22:24:58 glezos *Summer!
Mar 18 22:25:39 vpv thanks!
Mar 18 22:25:48 marek damn, when? :]
Mar 18 22:25:55 couf yeah enjoy DST change
Mar 18 22:26:29 marek ok bye1
Mar 18 22:26:48 noriko thanks all
16 years, 1 month
Meeting time
by Dimitris Glezos
Yup, the dreadful discussion came up again. Some folks had to stay up
late and some to wake up at 5am to make the meeting, so we need to try
and fix this.
The following is a chart with 5 timezones listed: Europe, India,
Australia, Eastern USA (and UTC).
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=2&day=5&year...
It seems 11UTC might fit the bill. That's:
UTC: 11:00
Paris: 12:00 Noon
Patras, Greece: 13:00
Pune, India: 16:30
Brisbane, AU: 21:00
Brazil: 08:00
Also 12UTC might fix things up for Brazil, but it's pushing the
envelope for Australia a bit.
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--
16 years, 1 month
Update of setroubleshoot/plugins not reflected on stats
by Alexander Todorov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
yesterday I've commited my translated PO file. I've updated more than 100 fuzzy
and some untranslated strings. Most of them needed a change of $SOURCE_PATH ->
$SOURCE as well as other minor issues.
The log message in Tfx is:
Alexander Todorov plugins/po/bg.po
Updated Bulgarian translation - 0 fuzzy and untr.
2008-03-17 16:57:26
At the moment: 18.03.2008 13:30 UTC I'm still seeing the old stats about this
module at https://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/bg/fedora-9
The PO file served is still the old one.
I've commited translation to firstboot several hours later and the stats were
updated OK. What's wrong with setroubleshoot? How do I fix it?
Thanks,
Alexander.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH38Q8hmd3WOiFct4RCiftAJ9Qz2+9DZcMPQqQHe5Puz4sdKlvdgCdG/xh
MR676vwVtxQaedZQ6BirZaI=
=MiEc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
16 years, 1 month
Fedora 9 Preview Release notes ready for translation
by Karsten Wade
## Resending with a proper subject ;-D
The Fedora Documentation Project is pleased to deliver the POT file for
the Fedora 9 release notes. These release notes are going to be
delivered with the Fedora 9 Preview Release. This provides time for
bugfixes to the content and translations through the community review
process.
Access via Transifex:
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/submit/module/docs-release-notes
More instructions for other access methods are below[1].
This POT file is the largest untranslated/fuzzy file that Fedora
Documentation intends to deliver for the Fedora 9 release cycle. During
the rest of the release cycle the team will work to reduce workload for
translators. If you have any questions, contact us on fedora-docs-list:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Definitely let us know if we are missing any of the steps in making the
files available for translators. We'll fix it right away! Stop by
#fedora-docs on irc.freenode.net or send an email back to this thread.
Thanks
- Fedora release notes team
[1] More access methods:
Via CVS:
cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/docs/release-notes/devel/
If you want a complete documentation build environment for the release
notes:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/docs
cvs co release-notes-devel
If you need just the directory with XML and /po directory:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/docs
cvs co release-notes-dir
--
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
16 years, 1 month
ideas for f-trans-l announcement
by Karsten Wade
The Fedora Documentation Project is pleased to deliver the POT file for
the Fedora 9 release notes. These release notes are going to be
delivered with the Fedora 9 Preview Release. This provides time for
bugfixes to the content and translations through the community review
process.
Access via Transifex:
https://translate.fedoraproject.org/submit/module/docs-release-notes
More instructions for other access methods are below[1].
This POT file is the largest untranslated/fuzzy file that Fedora
Documentation intends to deliver for the Fedora 9 release cycle. During
the rest of the release cycle the team will work to reduce workload for
translators. If you have any questions, contact us on fedora-docs-list:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Definitely let us know if we are missing any of the steps in making the
files available for translators. We'll fix it right away! Stop by
#fedora-docs on irc.freenode.net or send an email back to this thread.
Thanks
- Fedora release notes team
[1] More access methods:
Via CVS:
cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/docs/release-notes/devel/
If you want a complete documentation build environment for the release
notes:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/docs
cvs co release-notes-devel
If you need just the directory with XML and /po directory:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
export CVSROOT=:ext:USERNAME@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/docs
cvs co release-notes-dir
--
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
16 years, 1 month
Transifex not uptdate anaconda
by Francesco Tombolini
On 2008-03-15 07:52:55 I have pushed an updated it.po to anaconda by
transifex, but at today, I can't see the stats updated or the new file
merged.
Can someone help me?
Thank-you
--
Francesco Tombolini <tombo(a)adamantio.net>
Key fingerprint = EDA9 7504 AA93 CEFC 5990 1356 8584 6B05 F140 5F73
http://www.adamantio.net
16 years, 1 month
