-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/2010 08:02 AM, Piotr Drąg wrote:
W dniu 10.03.2010 00:02, Dimitris Glezos pisze:
> I'd like to know what our Uber Tx Maintainer, Piotr thinks. He's the
> guy who makes these kind of things happen. =)
>
If there are only pluses, there is nothing we can do really. ;) So
projects concerned here are these:
Avahi
FreeIPA
iBus
imsettings
PulseAudio
paprefs
pavucontrol
RPM
SSSD
Transifex
yum
FreeIPA and SSSD are different from the rest, because they are hosted on
fedorahosted.org and I believe they use
tx.net only for the e-mail
submission feature. Should we count them as 'upstream' projects, or they
are willing to switch to t.fp.o after upgrade to 0.7? I'm CC'ing their
maintainers, I hope they can clear this out.
The SSSD is using
transifex.net because it supports the email submission
feature, and t.fp.o did not back when we were setting it up.
If you feel that it would get more attention on t.fp.o, then I'm all for it.
Another different set of packages are iBus and imsettings, which I guess
should be moved to
tx.net already. It is of course up to their maintainers.
For now, I'm going to create "Various upstream resources" (anyone with
better naming for it and for current Various?) and move non-fedorahosted
projects here.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuXmX8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6Ni/wCfdho0IT0IdZlfayTHy+ojS1B+
L70AmQGcc+AvatWbxA537ctVt+nZ4Uu5
=6d7M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----