On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 16:54 -0500, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Ray Strode wrote:
>> But desktop-effects has more strings than just the desktop file.
>>
>
> Ah right...We should just upstream it at elvis, I guess.
>
Desktop Effects is already checked into elvis.
Since we're on the subject, it was pointed out to me the other day that
the desktop-effects source is missing copyright and authorship
statements. We can assume Red Hat owns the copyright, but it would be
nice to know who wrote it too.
- ajax