I've created a page just packages targeting l10n FAD: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/G11N/vFAD_Translation_Packages It's reference from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI list. --------------------------------------------- Alex Eng Senior Software Engineer Globalisation Tools Engineering DID: +61 3514 8262 <callto:+61+3514+8262> Mobile: +614 2335 3457 <callto:+614+2335+3457> Red Hat, Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd Level 1, 193 North Quay Brisbane 4000 Office: +61 7 3514 8100 <callto:+61+7+3514+8100> Fax: +61 7 3514 8199 <callto:+61+7+3514+8199> Website: www.redhat.com On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM, pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com < pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > > On 29 August 2016 at 11:45, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft < > jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr&gt; wrote: > >> Le 26/08/2016 à 20:24, pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com a écrit : >> >>> Not Done - Zanata readiness for list of packages, including branch etc. >>> (Alex and Jean-baptiste) going to help. (Good to have by 30th August) >>> >> I open all projects, only blivet looks weird to me, too many version and >> difficult to know where to edit. >> I created a new bug : https://github.com/rhinstaller/blivet/issues/495 >> >> All others have master/head or f25. >> > > That's nice. I hope, he can do it quickly. I think good if i can also > comment there. > > I have created badge ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fedor > a-badges/ticket/486 and as usual i forgot to add people in cc :( > Justin please have a look into it. > > Thanks, > Pravin >

2016-09-01 0:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Eng <aeng(a)redhat.com&gt;: > Also, updated the list in Zanata: > > https://fedora.zanata.org/version-group/view/main/ > Please revert the changes. The new list doesn't conform to the main/upstream definitions. Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org -- trans mailing list trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/trans@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-09-01 1:45 GMT+02:00 Alex Eng <aeng(a)redhat.com&gt;: > Piotr, > > Have we got the list for main/upstream ? The previous was outdated anyway. > The groups on Zanata are (well, "were" now) carefully curated and up to date, and I don't think they exist anywhere else. Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org -- trans mailing list trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/trans@lists.fedoraproject.org

2016-09-01 2:12 GMT+02:00 Alex Eng <aeng(a)redhat.com&gt;: > Are you sure? With RHEL-6 in the group? > Is RHEL6 not supported anymore? Anyway, there is no RHEL-specific group, so rhel-6 and rhel-7 branches were kept in main. Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg https://piotrdrag.fedorapeople.org -- trans mailing list trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/trans@lists.fedoraproject.org

Good point :)

2016-09-01 0:23 GMT+02:00 Alex Eng <aeng(a)redhat.com&gt;: > Also, updated the list in Zanata: > > https://fedora.zanata.org/version-group/view/main/ > Please revert the changes. The new list doesn't conform to the main/upstream definitions.

That's a good idea. I added packages from the wiki list to this group, plus release notes (install guide doesn't have f25 or master branches). Comments, what should be added/removed etc., are very welcome! Best regards,