February 2009 - triage - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 483777] New: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483777 Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: festival AssignedTo: davidz(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mattdm(a)mattdm.org, skasal(a)redhat.com, thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de, tim(a)niemueller.de, mclasen(a)redhat.com, davidz(a)redhat.com, kwizart(a)gmail.com, robert.zhangle(a)gmail.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, schiffer(a)cs.rwth-aachen.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 242607 Created an attachment (id=330741) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330741) rpmlint on installed festival package +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #242607 +++ --- Additional comment from kwizart(a)gmail.com on 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721) undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on installed package). Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 440580] New: no gpm mouse support in mc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '09

15 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580 Summary: no gpm mouse support in mc Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mc AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stsp(a)aknet.ru QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com,leonard-rh- bugzilla@den.ottolander.nl,stsp@aknet.ru +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194593 +++ Description of problem: Mouse doesn't work in mc. "ldd /usr/bin/mc" doesn't list libgpm, so the mouse obviously is not expeced to work. This is quite bad, unless I am missing something obvious. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mc-4.6.1a-13.FC5 How reproducible: Press the left mouse button and move the mouse. Only the gpm text selection happens. You can't go to menu or move the mc cursor with the mouse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 456393] New: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393 Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: texlive-texmf AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: uckelman(a)nomic.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++ Description of problem: Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0) is two years newer and has far more features. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 481147] New: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: cpan2rpm AssignedTo: gavin.henry(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: gavin.brown(a)uk.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, gavin.henry(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 279251 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #279251 +++ Description of problem: The latest version of Pod::Text from CPAN is from RRA/podlators-2.2.2.tar.gz Pod::Text no longer derives from Pod::Parser so the method 'interpolate' does not exist. As near as I can tell, this is the only method used in cpan2rpm, so Pod::Text can be changed to Pod::Parser in the two places it appears. This is what I did locally and it now works for me. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc8.1.noarch How reproducible: update Pod::Text via cpan. Run cpan2rpm for some module (any will do...) Actual results: [...] -- module: /var/cache/cpan/build/libwww-perl-5.808-baHtIL -- Metadata retrieval Can't locate object method "interpolate" via package "Pod::Text" at /usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 522. -- Done -- Expected results: No failure from above. Additional info: --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-14 10:14:55 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-16 22:19:58 EDT --- Fedora 7 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on June 13, 2008. Fedora 7 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 198392] Package nfs-utils lacks IPv6 support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '09

28 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198392 Tore Anderson <tore(a)fud.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tore(a)fud.no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 170620] pam_stack is deprecated
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '09

28 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170620 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |system-config-cluster-1.0.5 | |3-5 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> 2009-02-28 12:00:04 EDT --- Fixed by myself... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244802] Newly-created VMs should keep initial CDROM image setting
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244802 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-27 00:50:12 EDT --- This works quite well in Fedora 10 (and probably did in Fedora 9). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232591] kernel rpm install blows away grub preferences
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232591 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232591] kernel rpm install blows away grub preferences
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232591 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|6 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244699] Keyboard shortcut for Gnome logout not working (involves gnome-session)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244699 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> 2009-02-26 17:47:59 EDT --- Confirming for Fedora 10. Shortcut for logout, actually tries to shutdown (shows shutdown,restart, suspend, etc). By default logout shortcut is c-a-delete. Changing to c-a-l yields same result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 189518] keyboard state modifiers erroneously depend on keypress order
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189518 Steve Fink <sphink(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sphink(a)gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Steve Fink <sphink(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-26 14:05:40 EDT --- I am seeing this also, on Fedora 10. You can see my xkbcomp output in the upstream bug 2871. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244699] Keyboard shortcut for Gnome logout not working (involves gnome-session)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244699 Craig Routledge <webstuff(a)craigroutledge.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #5 from Craig Routledge <webstuff(a)craigroutledge.com> 2009-02-26 13:02:13 EDT --- Ctrl-Alt-L, but changing it (via System->Preferences->Personal->Keyboard Shortcuts) yields the same result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 David Rees <drees76(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drees76(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250906] Nautilus crashed - Large text input
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250906 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 253630] Clash of short-cut in search dialog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253630 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250906] Nautilus crashed - Large text input
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250906 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name --- Comment #3 from lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> 2009-02-25 17:13:25 EDT --- reproduced with Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244699] Keyboard shortcut for Gnome logout not working (involves gnome-session)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244699 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #4 from lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> 2009-02-25 17:01:18 EDT --- What is the keyboard shortcut ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244699] Keyboard shortcut for Gnome logout not working (involves gnome-session)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244699 Craig Routledge <webstuff(a)craigroutledge.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Craig Routledge <webstuff(a)craigroutledge.com> 2009-02-25 11:58:13 EDT --- The keyboard shortcut now does something. Unfortunately, it calls up the shutdown dialog (System->Shut Down) instead of the logout (System->Log Out) dialog. I'm not sure what package is responsible for this. I am using Fedora 10 with the latest updates as of today: dbus-1.2.4-2.fc10.x86_64 gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5.6-1.fc10 |2.5.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-25 11:28:24 EDT --- postfix-2.5.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5.6-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-25 11:27:44 EDT --- postfix-2.5.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244699] Keyboard shortcut for Gnome logout not working (involves gnome-session)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244699 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> 2009-02-25 06:44:12 EDT --- Those 2 gnome bugs are have both been closed. Is this still a bug for the reporter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 230835] asus_acpi always loads
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230835 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 230002] "CD/DVD Creator" menu item uses wrong icon when "Bluecurve" theme is chosen
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Feb '09

25 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230002 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kl.munsteiner(a)arcor.de --- Comment #31 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-02-24 22:59:14 EDT --- *** Bug 475166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247017] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247017 Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-24 19:57:35 EDT --- The initscripts call daemon and killproc from init.d/functions and returns the return code from them. Assuming daemon and killproc follow the guidelins, pcscd will as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229485] Module is leaking an open file descriptor to /var/run/pcscd.pub
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229485 Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #323919|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #323919|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229485] Module is leaking an open file descriptor to /var/run/pcscd.pub
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229485 Bob Relyea <rrelyea(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #323918|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #323918|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 332781] No sound for non-root users
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332781 --- Comment #31 from D E Evans <sinuhe(a)gnu.org> 2009-02-24 16:15:34 EDT --- I repeated comment 17's suggestion (step 29's 0666 mode is disconcerting) with success. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 185862] %_sharedstatedir violates the FHS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185862 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |4.6.0-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 185862] %_sharedstatedir violates the FHS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185862 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-24 15:51:45 EDT --- rpm-4.6.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 332781] No sound for non-root users
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332781 D E Evans <sinuhe(a)gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sinuhe(a)gnu.org --- Comment #30 from D E Evans <sinuhe(a)gnu.org> 2009-02-24 12:36:52 EDT --- I am getting the permission denied issue (on a T61p with f10, updated as of last night): [sinuhe@seshat ~]$ alsamixer alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: Permission denied [sinuhe@seshat ~]$ Everything works fine as root, or as a user from a text console, but upon startx (~/.xinitrc has "exec fvwm" only), as a user I get the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 158967] no i18n message on menu
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158967 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228213] HelixPlayer: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228213 lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |floss(a)lex.hider.name Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from lexual <floss(a)lex.hider.name> 2009-02-24 09:25:46 EDT --- https://bugzilla.fedora.us/wiki/PackageMaintainers/RetiredPackages Looks like helixplayer has been removed from future Fedora versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232591] kernel rpm install blows away grub preferences
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Feb '09

24 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232591 Sam Tygier <samtygier(a)yahoo.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samtygier(a)yahoo.co.uk --- Comment #4 from Sam Tygier <samtygier(a)yahoo.co.uk> 2009-02-24 07:40:08 EDT --- this seems to still be an issue in F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 331981] remove obsolete norwegian bokmål translations from fedora
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331981 David Lawrence <dkl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dkl(a)redhat.com |notting(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 135381] The "Alt Gr" key on int'l keyboards is not working from a windows vnc client
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135381 Adam Tkac <atkac(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Patch | Version|9 |rawhide Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 135381] The "Alt Gr" key on int'l keyboards is not working from a windows vnc client
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135381 --- Comment #20 from Adam Tkac <atkac(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-23 11:39:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=332901) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332901) [details] > Fix the problem for a Danish keyboard > > The patch fixes the problem for a Danish keyboard. > > With this patch, alt-gr and dead keys work. Patch is for builtin server inside kvm and fixes problem only when you are connecting to kvm virtual machine. I will clone this bug against kvm, this bug tracks problem with Xvnc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 135381] The "Alt Gr" key on int'l keyboards is not working from a windows vnc client
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135381 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221073] logrotate script should use SIGUSR1 signal not SIGHUP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221073 Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221073] logrotate script should use SIGUSR1 signal not SIGHUP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221073 Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 135381] The "Alt Gr" key on int'l keyboards is not working from a windows vnc client
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Feb '09

23 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135381 --- Comment #19 from Mogens Kjaer <mk(a)crc.dk> 2009-02-23 02:07:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332901) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332901) Fix the problem for a Danish keyboard The patch fixes the problem for a Danish keyboard. With this patch, alt-gr and dead keys work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356221] gnome-power-manager does not save changes made to certain settings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Feb '09

22 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356221 Eric Work <work.eric(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Keywords| |Reopened Platform|i386 |All CC| |work.eric(a)gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #6 from Eric Work <work.eric(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-23 00:59:49 EDT --- This is still a problem in Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248955] beagleidx should not run by default
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Feb '09

21 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248955 Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-21 11:10:32 EDT --- Beagle is disabled by default, unless you install it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248955] beagleidx should not run by default
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Feb '09

21 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248955 David Nielsen <gnomeuser(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gnomeuser(a)gmail.com |adel.gadllah(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225406] split out libcom_err and libuuid?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Feb '09

20 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225406 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225406] split out libcom_err and libuuid?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Feb '09

20 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225406 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-20 12:25:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=332736) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332736) Proposed patch to e2fsprogs.spec Here is a copy of an email I sent to Eric on this subject. - - - - I would like to propose that e2fsprogs generate four subpackages for the independent libraries that it contains. These four libraries are used by other packages that don't need the whole of e2fsprogs-devel (eg. krb5_workstation uses libss, qpid uses libuuid, and many programs use libcom_err). Our specific use case is to help with ongoing work porting libraries to MinGW (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW) where we would prefer to package mingw32-libuuid for mingw32-qpidc without needing to port the whole of e2fsprogs. I looked at Debian's package, and would like to propose a split along the same lines: http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/e2fsprogs Despite the apparent complexity, there are only really four subpackages. For the Fedora package we would create: libblkid libblkid-devel libcom_err libcom_err-devel [note 1] libss libss-devel libuuid libuuid-devel There are no conflicting package names in Fedora at the moment, except for the similarly named libss7 (a library implementing Signalling System 7 telephone switching protocol). I have attached a patch against Rawhide which does the above split. I set up the dependencies so there should be no loss of functionality for users who install just e2fsprogs or e2fsprogs-devel. What remains is to advertize the split on fedora-devel-list and encourage package maintainers to replace: BuildRequires: e2fsprogs-devel with BuildRequires: lib<uuid|ss|blkid|com_err>-devel where appropriate. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Common_Character_S… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225406] split out libcom_err and libuuid?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Feb '09

20 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225406 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 223642] unsatisfied dependencies after allowing erase
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Feb '09

19 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223642 devzero2000 <pinto.elia(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pinto.elia(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Feb '09

19 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206 --- Comment #14 from Ben Skeggs <bskeggs(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-19 04:20:10 EDT --- I'm not sure of the exact procedure in this case, but nouveau is default in rawhide so perhaps CLOSED,RAWHIDE ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Feb '09

19 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206 --- Comment #13 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-19 04:10:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Yes, you are right -- nouveau is not an officially supported driver yet. > However, I will leave the last word to the developer -- if you are using > nouveau now (and I am really really glad it does work for you -- number of > people for whom nouveau works better than nv seems to be slowly but surely > rising) ... I am sorry, my firefox crashed and I don't know what I wanted to write here ;-). To make it short, Ben, what to do with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ajax(a)redhat.com |bskeggs(a)redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-18 19:03:30 EDT --- Yes, you are right -- nouveau is not an officially supported driver yet. However, I will leave the last word to the developer -- if you are using nouveau now (and I am really really glad it does work for you -- number of people for whom nouveau works better than nv seems to be slowly but surely rising) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 245377] Update to 1.2.1??
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245377 Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-02-18 13:25:31 EDT --- 1.2.1 is at stable, and about to be replaced by 1.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 334811] Future Feature: Better crash reports with bug-buddy
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '09

18 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334811 Christopher Beland <beland(a)alum.mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #7 from Christopher Beland <beland(a)alum.mit.edu> 2009-02-18 07:59:56 EDT --- A fix is apparently targeted for Fedora 11: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DebuginfoFS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206 --- Comment #11 from Dawid Zamirski <dzrudy(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-17 20:32:16 EDT --- Hello The issue seems to be gone with latest nouveau driver (for tested both PC's and monitors). The "nv" driver is still having this issue though, but it's irrelevant for me, and I feel that this bug can be closed. I'll keep it open for now as the bug report was originally opened against "nv" and it's still the default one in Xorg. If you think otherwise, feel free to close it. Regards, Dawid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 238206] INcorrect resolution/refresh rate dection for Samsung 940n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238206 Dawid Zamirski <dzrudy(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 312521] unnecessarily loading raid456
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=312521 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:00:07 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-17 15:10:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This module (and it's deps) should only be loaded if they are needed. Attached > suggested patch. Applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 240745] nash nfsmount doesn't respect mount options + proposed patch
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Feb '09

17 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240745 Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-17 14:40:41 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444973 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos(a)serpentine.com |petersen(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-16 23:51:01 EDT --- ghc-gtk2hs-0.10.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 332781] No sound for non-root users
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332781 Sylvain <syl_acclassato(a)yahoo.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |syl_acclassato(a)yahoo.fr --- Comment #29 from Sylvain <syl_acclassato(a)yahoo.fr> 2009-02-16 19:54:37 EDT --- Hi there, just got the same issue and got it solved by adding as in the "post 17", these lines into /etc/security/console.perms.d/50-default.perms: "Make sure you put (0666 root) instead of (0600 root). @the TOP : <sound>=/dev/dsp* /dev/snd/* @the bottom: <console> 0666 <sound> 0666 root It now works just as perfect. Thanks Sylvain -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 249808] pcscd does not open /dev/ttyS1 after kernel update
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249808 Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel(a)mamane.lu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lionel(a)mamane.lu --- Comment #17 from Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel(a)mamane.lu> 2009-02-16 17:32:03 EDT --- I got the same issue and here is how I solved it: It was caused by setserial having saved (and restoring at boot time) the configuration of /dev/ttyS0 when the laptop computer was in its docking station, namely a 16650A, while the reader has a 16450 (or an emulation thereof). Telling setserial not to touch the configuration solved the problem, after a reboot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244431] DVD-based upgrades don't let the user know they still need to run 'yum upgrade'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244431 Andy Lindeberg <alindebe(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 James Ettle <theholyettlz(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |theholyettlz(a)googlemail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242386] Xorg burns CPU cycles, making desktop sluggish
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242386 --- Comment #24 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> 2009-02-16 13:32:20 EDT --- A simple workaround I've found for this is disabling KMS by adding "nomodeset" to the grub command line -- it has some negative sideeffects (no plymouth), but it works, X holds below 30 %, no sound flickering when starting firefox/scrolling pages/chaing tabs, the system is overall faster... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Robert Vogelgesang <vogel(a)folz.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vogel(a)folz.de --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:54:57 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #5 from Robert Vogelgesang <vogel(a)folz.de> 2009-02-16 08:43:56 EDT --- Is there any reason why this bug is _still_ not fixed? shorewall is definitely not used by the default configuration. This silly extra "Require" is the only reason why I have to build replacement RPMs for internal distribution of fail2ban. Havin g multiple firewall tools on one machine is crazy, at least as long as these don't share identical configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242468] Wrong init script
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Feb '09

16 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242468 Nicola Soranzo <nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 134638] Add striping to lvm creation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Feb '09

14 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638 --- Comment #20 from Curtis Doty <curtis(a)greenkey.net> 2009-02-14 12:18:09 EDT --- Compelling reason #1: Creating an LVM strip in %post is quite ugly: extents=`lvm pvs --noheadings -o pv_pe_count /dev/sd{b,i,c,j,d,k} |awk '{tot+=$1}END{print tot}'` stripesizeK=128 lvm lvcreate -l$extents -nbar -I$stripesizeK -i2 foo /dev/sd{b,i,c,j,d,k} Compelling reason #2: You can't do this for any system fs such as / or /usr. Please re-open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 254126] ghdl does not build on ppc64 due to missing gcc-gnat
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Feb '09

13 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254126 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247014] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247014 Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |openssh-5.1p1-7.fc11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 245377] Update to 1.2.1??
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Feb '09

12 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245377 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2009-02-12 09:46:23 EDT --- 1.2.1-2 on it's way through bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187485] Doesn't seem to renew TGT after it has expired
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187485 Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pcfe(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187485] Doesn't seem to renew TGT after it has expired
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187485 --- Comment #14 from Patrick C. F. Ernzer <pcfe(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 15:00:59 EDT --- *** Bug 234837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 245377] Update to 1.2.1??
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245377 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|john(a)ncphotography.com |limb(a)jcomserv.net --- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 14:21:39 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247065] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247065 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|john(a)ncphotography.com |limb(a)jcomserv.net --- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 14:21:32 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248408] Applet doesn't list running KVM domains
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248408 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kzak(a)redhat.com |crobinso(a)redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 12:24:44 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228902] SELinux: fine grained enforcement of sysfs objects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228902 James Morris <jmorris(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmorris(a)redhat.com --- Comment #5 from James Morris <jmorris(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 04:32:37 EDT --- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 230181] anaconda identifies multiple drives as a multipath
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230181 randygalbraith <randy.galbraith(a)cox.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randy.galbraith(a)cox.net --- Comment #11 from randygalbraith <randy.galbraith(a)cox.net> 2009-02-10 21:15:53 EDT --- FWIW: The comments in this bug regarding the "nompath" option (thank you!) helped me work around this very issue with my Fedora 10 install yesterday (February 9, 2009). Until I ran the install with the nompath option I could not get Fedora to see my two 320gb SATA Maxstor drives. I tried various BIOS settings and the nodmraid option which did not work. I even dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd[ab] when someone suggested "meta data" on the drives may be leading Fedora install program to only suggest /dev/mapper option. -Randy Galbraith -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Nigel Jones <bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk --- Comment #31 from Nigel Jones <bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk> 2009-02-10 14:54:36 EDT --- I'm getting this problem too. In my case it was occuring in F10, and is still occuring in rawhide Same as above: (from yum output) Installing : kernel 48/178 grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template Installing : kernel-PAE 49/178 grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template I think my sym link is ok sh-4.0# ls -la menu.lst lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2008-11-06 20:04 menu.lst -> ./grub.conf My current menu.lst is # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd0,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/rootlv # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sda default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora 11 (2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE ro nomodeset quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE.img I have to update menu.lst manually each time. Tedious on rawhide :-( COuld really do at least with grubby reporting a more useful error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246674] Screensaver activates when only second head is being used.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246674 Peter Doherty <doherty(a)crystal.harvard.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |doherty(a)crystal.harvard.edu --- Comment #13 from Peter Doherty <doherty(a)crystal.harvard.edu> 2009-02-10 12:34:56 EDT --- What's the status with this bug? Is anyone working on it? It seems to me that this is a pretty serious issue, that is being ignored for over a year now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #5 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-02-10 10:52:59 EDT --- The original isoinfo has proper UTF-8 and iconv support. Just use recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #27 from Jarod Wilson <jwilson(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-10 09:06:23 EDT --- Yep, I managed to acquire a Pismo a while back, and was able to observe similar behavior. I loaned the machine to someone else for some X-related stuff, and forgot all about it, need to go get it back from them, and with luck, I'll have some time soon to try to debug this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #26 from Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> 2009-02-10 03:13:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Endless repetition of "self ID complete" events could be caused by > firewire-ohci lacking a workaround for Uninorth v1 to break out of bus reset > loops (but then I would rather expect endless bus reset events without self ID > complete events), or could simply be a sign of dying hardware. I suppose, too, that there is some special treatment for the Uninorth v1 required. I don't think, that it's a hardware problem. The same FW hard disk is working correctly under Mac OSX (on the same Pismo) and on my second system (x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247204] [PATCH] cifs / smbfs, mount error 20, NAS device only supports smb
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247204 Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #201661|text/x-patch |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #201661|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186481] Creation of a new wireless network via NM should not have a 'connect' button in order to implement, nor should it tell you that it's trying to join a network
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186481 Suzanne Hillman <shillman(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|5 |9 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Suzanne Hillman <shillman(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 16:19:37 EDT --- NM still has 'connect' as the 'ok' option when creating a new network, and still claims to be trying to connect to a network, in F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187485] Doesn't seem to renew TGT after it has expired
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187485 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon(a)redhat.com |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #13 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 13:45:19 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #25 from Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> 2009-02-09 13:22:23 EDT --- Endless repetition of "self ID complete" events could be caused by firewire-ohci lacking a workaround for Uninorth v1 to break out of bus reset loops (but then I would rather expect endless bus reset events without self ID complete events), or could simply be a sign of dying hardware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 189070] gFTP has outdated localization files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189070 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon(a)redhat.com |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 13:13:51 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242386] Xorg burns CPU cycles, making desktop sluggish
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242386 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz --- Comment #23 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> 2009-02-08 14:49:47 EDT --- I have exactly the same problem with a laptop where this did NOT occur on F7-F9. After an upgrade to F10, the computer is hardly usable. It uses the radeon driver with AIGLX and Composite options set to "on" in xorg.conf (disabling them doesn't take any effect, nor adding the options mentioned in comment #15). The smolt profile of that machine is here: http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_d482fdbf-1991-4155-8144-bae766035dd0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #24 from Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> 2009-02-08 14:16:37 EDT --- Yes, I still have the hardware and I created a second fresh Fedora 10 system on my Pismo, without any changes in the configuration etc. So the kernel version is 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 The only thing I manually did was: rmmod firewire_ohci modprobe firewire_ohci debug=7 modprobe firewire_sbp2 (firewire_core is also loaded) firewire_ohci gave the following in the kernel log during modprobe: Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0002:24:0e.0, OHCI version 1.0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010010 selfID AR_req Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 1 selfIDs, generation 1, local node ID ffc0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8c52, phy 0 [--.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 1 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_core: created device fw0: GUID 003065fffe3f9f74, S400 When plugging in my external FW drive I get repeatedly from firewire_ohci: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00000010 AR_req Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010000 selfID Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 2 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 2 selfIDs, generation 2, local node ID ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8490, phy 0 [p-.] S400 gc=63 -3W L Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 817f8cd2, phy 1 [c-.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci and from firewire_core: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc1, gap_count=5 ... Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: giving up on config rom for node id ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc0, gap_count=5 The last message (changing sometimes from root=ffc0 to root=ffc1 and back) and the firewire_ohci messages are repeated until I remove the FW device. No message from firewire_sbp2. Does anybody have an idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #23 from Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> 2009-02-08 14:15:31 EDT --- Yes, I still have the hardware and I created a second fresh Fedora 10 system on my Pismo, without any changes in the configuration etc. So the kernel version is 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 The only thing I manually did was: rmmod firewire_ohci modprobe firewire_ohci debug=7 modprobe firewire_sbp2 (firewire_core is also loaded) firewire_ohci gave the following in the kernel log during modprobe: Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0002:24:0e.0, OHCI version 1.0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010010 selfID AR_req Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 1 selfIDs, generation 1, local node ID ffc0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8c52, phy 0 [--.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 1 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_core: created device fw0: GUID 003065fffe3f9f74, S400 When plugging in my external FW drive I get repeatedly from firewire_ohci: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00000010 AR_req Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010000 selfID Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 2 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 2 selfIDs, generation 2, local node ID ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8490, phy 0 [p-.] S400 gc=63 -3W L Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 817f8cd2, phy 1 [c-.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci and from firewire_core: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc1, gap_count=5 ... Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: giving up on config rom for node id ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc0, gap_count=5 The last message (changing sometimes from root=ffc0 to root=ffc1 and back) and the firewire_ohci messages are repeated until I remove the FW device. No message from firewire_sbp2. Does somebody has an idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235625] Clicking close button in Firefox crashes X nv driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235625 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235625] Clicking close button in Firefox crashes X nv driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235625 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235625] Clicking close button in Firefox crashes X nv driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235625 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222945] dual video card config doesn't work (No matching Device section for instance)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222945 --- Comment #16 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-08 12:51:54 EDT --- Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/Xorg(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80c9bd1] 1: [0xe08420] 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/r128_drv.so(R128FreeScreen+0x2b) [0x20c61b] 3: /usr/bin/Xorg(xf86DeleteScreen+0x6e) [0x80c104e] 4: /usr/bin/Xorg(InitOutput+0x865) [0x80a1b55] 5: /usr/bin/Xorg(main+0x276) [0x806f856] 6: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x811f2c] 7: /usr/bin/Xorg(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e9) [0x806eda1] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222945] dual video card config doesn't work (No matching Device section for instance)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222945 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-07 19:32:31 EDT --- Actually I forgot to remove the --auto-ghci-libs from ghc-pkg update in %post so this build will not actually fix the problem. :-( It should be fixed already in ghc-gtk2hs-0.10.0-0.1.fc11 in rawhide though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-07 17:23:18 EDT --- festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-07 17:18:58 EDT --- ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10, ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc10, haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10, ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.13-8.20081108.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc ghc-paths haddock ghc-gtk2hs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244465] Dell 1400x1050 resolution lap-top screen with Radeon Mobility M6 graphics is not supported
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244465 François Cami <fcami(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fcami(a)fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|ajax(a)redhat.com |airlied(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 245244] radeon 9100 + dvi == failure, should work out of box
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245244 François Cami <fcami(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |fcami(a)fedoraproject.org Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA --- Comment #16 from François Cami <fcami(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-07 09:46:23 EDT --- The information we've requested above is required in order to review this problem report further and diagnose or fix the issue if it is still present. Since it has been thirty days or more since we first requested additional information, we're assuming the problem is either no longer present in the current Fedora release, or that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem. Setting status to "CLOSED: INSUFFICIENT_DATA". If you still experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora release and can provide the information previously requested, please feel free to reopen the bug report. Thank you in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |piotrdrag(a)gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 484489] New: messagebus fails to start if the system is configured with ldap authentication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: messagebus fails to start if the system is configured with ldap authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484489 Summary: messagebus fails to start if the system is configured with ldap authentication Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: bzcl34nup Severity: high Priority: medium Component: nss_ldap AssignedTo: nalin(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net QAContact: qe-baseos-auto(a)redhat.com CC: rbulling(a)pkrinternet.com, tibbs(a)math.uh.edu, jwilson(a)redhat.com, oracle(a)provocation.net, ian(a)iay.org.uk, ask(a)develooper.com, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, jplans(a)redhat.com, amessina(a)messinet.com, dqarras(a)yahoo.com, jsafrane(a)redhat.com, amcnabb(a)mcnabbs.org, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com Depends on: 206399 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Clone Of: 206399 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #206399 +++ Description of problem: The script /etc/init.d/messagebus hangs during bootup if the system is configured for LDAP authentication. Disabling LDAP authentication solves the problem. _____________________________________________________________________ The problems described in the bug above exist in RHEL5 since 5.0. If the server rebooting is ldap-serving itself, dbus hangs during reboots. In a debugging session, ensuring that ldap starts before messagebus solved the issue. So it either needs a reordering of the boot sequence of the services (e.g. move ldap to the front of any consuming service), or some nss_ldap magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #22 from Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> 2009-02-07 08:04:18 EDT --- Helmut, do you still have the hardware (and Fedora on it)? If so, please test once more with the latest Fedora kernel package. There have been a few firewire driver updates in the meantime which /perhaps/ have a positive effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206399] messagebus fails to start if the system is configured with ldap authentication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206399 Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484489 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Feb '09

06 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 --- Comment #11 from Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-06 01:31:12 EDT --- Please raise the issue upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 --- Comment #10 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim <timliim(a)alcatel-lucent.com> 2009-02-06 00:26:54 EDT --- Behdad, How does the proposal in Comment #8 sounds to you? Let me know if anything can be improved. Maybe we can finally close this 2+ year old bug in F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #30 from Need Real Name <howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu> 2009-02-05 21:36:20 EDT --- In case it helps, I get the following from /sbin/blkid... /dev/md2: TYPE="swap" /dev/md0: UUID="0469a110-494a-499f-9a43-d4c821658e3b" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/md3: UUID="c73e4943-90d4-49af-baeb-3c91222b5131" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/md1: UUID="3adeca51-506e-4b51-aea7-c0ca9525ec36" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sdb5: UUID="c73e4943-90d4-49af-baeb-3c91222b5131" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sdb3: TYPE="swap" /dev/sdb2: UUID="3adeca51-506e-4b51-aea7-c0ca9525ec36" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sdb1: UUID="0469a110-494a-499f-9a43-d4c821658e3b" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sda5: UUID="c73e4943-90d4-49af-baeb-3c91222b5131" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sda3: TYPE="swap" /dev/sda2: UUID="3adeca51-506e-4b51-aea7-c0ca9525ec36" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sda1: UUID="0469a110-494a-499f-9a43-d4c821658e3b" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" Is it possible that grubby doesn't understand software raid-1 partitions when defined through a UUID rather than the traditional /dev/md# in the pre-existing grub.conf? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 431355] oowriter .odt - Nimbus Roman No9 L linespacing seems to be changed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431355 Marcelo <mmtsales(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmtsales(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Marcelo <mmtsales(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-05 16:01:58 EDT --- I have a similar problem. In F10, after the last openoffice update to version 3.0.1-15.2, my ooocalc spreadsheets are taking more horizontal space than before. It seems the horizontal spacing has changed. I can be mistaken, but I think only the numbers are more spaced, I can't see any difference in the space between letters. But I'm sure something has changed, because I have some spreadsheets which were exactly as wide as my screen and now they don't fit anymore. The font used is Arial. I can see no noticeable difference in ooowriter documents. Does this make sense? Is this possibly related to the bug reported by the OP? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Need Real Name <howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu --- Comment #29 from Need Real Name <howarth(a)nitro.med.uc.edu> 2009-02-05 16:00:29 EDT --- I am seeing the same problem after upgrading a system on software RAID-1 from Fedora 8 to 10. The Fedora 10 upgrade went fine except the boot loader upgrade option didn't work (which I have seen on other systems before). I took the usual route of repeating the upgrade but selecting the third option to install a new boot loader. Now the Fedora 10 installation boots fine but when I did the first yum update the rpm failed to install the entry in grub.conf with the error grubby fatal error unable to find a suitable template I noticed that I had a grub,conf.rpmsave with... default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora (2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 ro root=/dev/md1 nodmraid rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64.img but that the current grub.conf has... default=0 timeout=0 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora (2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 ro root=UUID=3adeca51-506e-4b51-aea7-c0ca9525ec36 nodmraid initrd /initrd-2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64.img I was able to manually add the new kernel to grub.conf using /dev/md1 for root. I am assuming that the new use of the UUID label is screwing up attempt to add the grub entry when the new kernel is installed. I would also note that this machine was originally installed with Windows RAID drivers by the vendor so that I have to use nodmraid to keep dmraid from getting confused by the tattooing on the drive. Perhaps this is related and the wrong labels are being read? Any idea on how to debug this problem further? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #28 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 14:56:15 EDT --- *** Bug 484243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221073] logrotate script should use SIGUSR1 signal not SIGHUP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221073 --- Comment #4 from Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 12:07:24 EDT --- *** Bug 436724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242773] [nouveau] no longer works at all
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242773 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ajax(a)redhat.com |bskeggs(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 11:57:55 EDT --- Reassigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 332821] remembers passphrase even when you tell it not to
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332821 Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(notting(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 10:41:11 EDT --- Yes, thsi works now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247239] rpm-q --last produces strange output on non-existent packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247239 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #9 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 08:43:28 EDT --- Not going to get fixed for F9 or F10 either for that matter, changing the stdout/stderr behavior of rpm would break loads of existing scripts so this is not something that can be fixed "just like that". Moving this to upstream tracking: http://rpm.org/ticket/31 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 182498] Unnecessary byte-compilation of python scripts in /usr/bin
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182498 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-05 05:22:21 EDT --- Fixed upstream now, bin and sbin directories are excluded from byte compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-05 04:47:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Send too early Actually your problem can be solved with the mentioned bug in > one go, but they are still slightly different. New bug or make the mentioned > bug a "catch all symbol problems" one? which was done here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483777 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #28 from Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> 2009-02-05 04:39:30 EDT --- Send too early Actually your problem can be solved with the mentioned bug in one go, but they are still slightly different. New bug or make the mentioned bug a "catch all symbol problems" one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #27 from Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> 2009-02-05 04:38:25 EDT --- Please post your log to bug #470995 which is the appropriate one. This bug was about the broken headers (misplaced files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 Jiri Skala <jskala(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Feb '09

05 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #329721|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 --- Comment #23 from Don Russell <fedora(a)drussell.dnsalias.com> 2009-02-04 21:56:26 EDT --- I installed the rpm file from comment #20 and have tested it over a couple of days. It works the way I expect, properly picking up the name or the entire "raw" FSK data depending on the modem setting. Thank you, Don Russell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 229141] initscript does not allow customizations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229141 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-04 21:18:03 EDT --- ss5-3.6.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ss5'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1319 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 332821] remembers passphrase even when you tell it not to
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332821 Dan Williams <dcbw(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(notting(a)redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #13 from Dan Williams <dcbw(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 19:05:29 EDT --- Is this still an issue with latest NM and vpnc? The vpnc bits were changed before Christmas to let the user specify always asking for the password, irregardless of the keyring. NetworkManager-0.7.0-1.git20090102 NetworkManager-vpnc-0.7.0-1.svn13 In the connection editor for the VPN connection, look for the popup menus next to each password and pick the one you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 212638] mkinitrd won't compile using RHEL4 gcc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212638 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 16:20:57 EDT --- Compiling Fedora's mkinitrd on anything but the same Fedora is not supported, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 209473] mkinitrd --rootdev LABEL=foo doesn't work as expected
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209473 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 16:17:53 EDT --- I've just build a new mkinitrd in rawhide (6.0.76) which streamlines the storage device handling somewhat. This should definitely fix --rootdev LABEL= , if not please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 212124] PATCH fix the root argument to mkrootdev in case of lvm by LABEL boot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212124 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 16:14:12 EDT --- I've just checked this and this no longer is a problem in the current mkinitrd, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #25 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 16:06:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Thank you! Do you plan to push this to F10 at least (after suitable testing)? > I'd like to be able to test it against my asus (bug 478878). Yes the plan is to include this in the next mkinitrd update for F-10 which will be soonish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #24 from Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2009-02-04 15:57:30 EDT --- Thank you! Do you plan to push this to F10 at least (after suitable testing)? I'd like to be able to test it against my asus (bug 478878). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #23 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 15:50:03 EDT --- Hi all, I'm terrible sorry this took us so long. This is fixed in mkinitrd-6.0.76, which will be in the next rawhide push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199246] enhancement: Add bridge support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ehabkost(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 218905] [ta_IN] Some conjunct characters not appearing with proper shape
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Feb '09

04 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218905 Venkatraman Balasubramanian <cbvenkat(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cbvenkat(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #5 from Venkatraman Balasubramanian <cbvenkat(a)hotmail.com> 2009-02-04 02:29:05 EDT --- This is a huge disturbance in using my Linux box. This U+0BB6 works great when combined with U+0BC7 etc., in my Mac OSX box. Like Padmanabhan stated here, Pango has to be fixed to make Linux be in compliance with Unicode 4.1 and higher. Please re-open this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 115157] executables linked statically with /usr/lib/nptl/libpthread.a fail
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115157 geir(a)cray.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |geir(a)cray.com --- Comment #15 from geir(a)cray.com 2009-02-03 17:50:31 EDT --- FYI: I find that the problem fails on a SLES 9.2 system, but works on a SLES 9.3 system: SLES 9.2 failing: $ cat /etc/SuSE-release SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (x86_64) VERSION = 9 PATCHLEVEL = 2 $ cat test2.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <pthread.h> void * thread_sub (void *p) { int *i; i = (int *) p; printf("Hello, world, I am thread %d\n", *i); fflush(stdout); pthread_exit(NULL); } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { pthread_t *threads; int *ind; int err; int i; int tcount = 0; void *status; if (argc < 2) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: must specify number of threads\n"); exit(1); } tcount = atoi(argv[1]); fprintf(stderr, "INFO: tcount = %d\n", tcount); if (tcount <= 0) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: thread count must be > 0\n"); } threads = malloc(sizeof(pthread_t) * tcount); if (threads == NULL) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: cannot malloc threads array\n"); exit (2); } ind = malloc(sizeof(int) * tcount); if (ind == NULL) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: cannot malloc ind array\n"); exit (2); } for (i = 1; i < tcount; i++) { ind[i] = i; fprintf(stderr, "INFO: start thread %d\n", i); err = 0; err = pthread_create (&threads[i], NULL, thread_sub, (void *) &ind[i]); if (err) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: pthread_create %d, err=%d\n", i, err); exit(3+i); } } ind[0] = 0; thread_sub(&ind[0]); for (i=1; i < tcount; i++) { err = pthread_join(threads[i], &status); if (err) { fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: pthread_join %d, err=%d\n", i, err); exit(10+i); } fprintf(stderr, "INFO: joined thread %d\n", i); } exit(0); } $ gcc -static test2.c -I /usr/include/nptl -L/usr/lib64/nptl -lpthread $ ./a.out 4 Memory fault $ Here is a SLES 9.3 system working: $ cat /etc/SuSE-release SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 (x86_64) VERSION = 9 PATCHLEVEL = 3 $ gcc -static test2.c -I /usr/include/nptl -L/usr/lib64/nptl -lpthread $ ./a.out 4 INFO: tcount = 4 INFO: start thread 1 INFO: start thread 2 INFO: start thread 3 Hello, world, I am thread 2 Hello, world, I am thread 1 Hello, world, I am thread 0 Hello, world, I am thread 3 $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208383] mkinitrd/iSCSI - only probe for network device if not already specified
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208383 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede(a)redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-03 08:15:13 EDT --- Short intro: i've been spending most of my time the last 2 months revamping anaconda (and mkinitrd) iscsi support. I'm afraid the attached patch is too simple, we can have cases where we have multiple iscsi disks we need to bring up in the initrd, using multiple interfaces (yes really) and in that case this patch will cause us to not configure the network interface for the second disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 209110] iSCSI root device name should be dynamic
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Feb '09

03 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209110 Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #15 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-03 08:09:07 EDT --- Ok, I've been working a lot on mkinitrd lately and getting to know it better. As such I can now say with certainty that allowing to specify root by targetname is not something which we are going to support. For cases where the device number may change one can already specify root by UUID or LABEL, and that is the supported solution to handle these situations, as this works independend of the underlying storage technique. We are not going to add various hacks to allow other ways of specifying the root device which are storage technique dependend. Closing this as not a bug, since it is not a bug (but a denied RFE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365691] Radeon driver locks up machine hard on a regular basis Radeon 9200
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365691 François Cami <francois.cami(a)free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |francois.cami(a)free.fr Flag| |needinfo?(drussell(a)redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #19 from François Cami <francois.cami(a)free.fr> 2009-02-02 17:33:59 EDT --- Dave (Russell), Could you test current F10 ? If that happens, could you post full dmesg and Xorg.0.log as uncompressed attachments ? Thanks -- fdc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 --- Comment #27 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-02 15:58:07 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 --- Comment #26 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-02 06:24:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Please re-open this bug as the problem is not fixed. Please file a new bug, so that we have you as a reporter. Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 --- Comment #25 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-02 06:05:47 EDT --- Please re-open this bug as the problem is not fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Mike <mike.cloaked(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-02 06:04:49 EDT --- Tested 2.24.1-7 on Samsung Q35 - switched mouse to left handed, and touchpad has also switched so that tap no longer gives normal options. So this updated has not worked for this laptop. This confirms comment #22 and a further attempt at fixing this problem is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187485] Doesn't seem to renew TGT after it has expired
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '09

02 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187485 Marco Grigull <mgrigull(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mgrigull(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage February 2009