July 2009 - triage - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 483777] New: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483777 Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: festival AssignedTo: davidz(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mattdm(a)mattdm.org, skasal(a)redhat.com, thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de, tim(a)niemueller.de, mclasen(a)redhat.com, davidz(a)redhat.com, kwizart(a)gmail.com, robert.zhangle(a)gmail.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, schiffer(a)cs.rwth-aachen.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 242607 Created an attachment (id=330741) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330741) rpmlint on installed festival package +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #242607 +++ --- Additional comment from kwizart(a)gmail.com on 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721) undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on installed package). Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 499204] New: Hardware freezes on Dell Optiplex 320 while booting
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hardware freezes on Dell Optiplex 320 while booting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204 Summary: Hardware freezes on Dell Optiplex 320 while booting Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: bzcl34nup Severity: high Priority: low Component: grub AssignedTo: pjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: d_preston215(a)yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pjones(a)redhat.com, tomc(a)kendeco.com, pawsa(a)theochem.kth.se, craigwhite(a)azapple.com, ajn(a)ite.gmu.edu, z(a)canteiros.org, kelsey(a)kelseyhightower.net, eric.caron(a)gmail.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, linux-bugs(a)dell.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 219715 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219715 +++ Description of problem: The machine, an Dell Optiplex 320, freezes while booting with grub. It seems to happen while the kernel is being loaded and before the kernel is started. Our guess is a bug in the BIOS that grub tickles. Booting with lilo works. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): grub-0.97-13.i386 The machine has the most recent version of the BIOS, 1.0.9. The command "blocklist /vmlinuz-2.6.18-1.2798.fc6" from the grub command-line also freezes the machine. --- Additional comment from ackistler(a)yahoo.com on 2007-01-20 20:47:13 EDT --- I have the same hardware, although I'm trying fc5 currently. Going to the grub command line, I can execute "cat /grub/menu.lst" and get the contents of the file displayed. (Of course, the menu is displayed on boot, too, so I expected cat to work.) However, on a manual attempt to boot, the kernel command freezes the machine. The Optiplex 320 has an ATI sb600 SATA controller, if that matters. I had to supply all-generic-ide to the installer to get it to run, but it ran. I'll post back here if my fc6 experience is different. --- Additional comment from pawsa(a)theochem.kth.se on 2007-03-26 13:46:12 EDT --- I see the bug on the same hardware (Dell Optiplex 320) with FC6 as well. "Uncompressing xxxx" is the last message I see. No combination of command line options that I tried (noprobe, noapic and so on) could fix it. Replacing the grub bootloader with lilo makes the problem disappear. This is seen with fc6 + all the updates installed allready in the installation phase: 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 kernel is being booted. --- Additional comment from kelsey(a)kelseyhightower.net on 2007-07-05 11:53:37 EDT --- I have this same machine. I am running RHEL 5 Workstation. I was able to get the machine to install, passing pci=nomsi as a kernel option. Everything installs fine, but the machine will not boot with its default boot loader GRUB. I have to use a rescue disk to install LILO overwriteing GRUB. I have since added a PCI SATA controller which allows the system to install without using the pci=nomsi option. I still get errors with the GRUB booting the Linux kernel. There seems to be conflict with GRUB and the BIOS, as LILO works and GRUB does not. Is this a issue that RedHat plans to address? Will they try and patch GRUB to work on these machines? Thanks for any feedback. --- Additional comment from matt_domsch(a)dell.com on 2007-07-24 14:58:34 EDT --- Has anyone tried passing 'edd=skipmbr' as a kernel option? Just curious... -Matt --- Additional comment from pawsa-gpa(a)theochem.kth.se on 2007-08-07 06:19:52 EDT --- I have just tried edd=skipmbr instead of pci=nomsi - and the kernel hangs just after the detection of the USB keyboard. Kernel version is 2.6.18-1.8.el5. I obviously booted with lilo - grub is nonfunctional in any form. --- Additional comment from eric.caron(a)gmail.com on 2007-09-07 13:33:44 EDT --- This bug still exists in Fedora 7. Its very hard to install on a new Optiplex 320. Installing Lilo presents its own issues because of DEVMAPPER-related issues, and grub2 doesn't appear to fix it either. --- Additional comment from eric.caron(a)gmail.com on 2007-09-07 15:47:56 EDT --- Interesting revelation... When I add "vga=792" to grub.conf, and boot from the CD and then choose "Boot from local disk" (which then loads grub from sda), the system boots perfectly. Does that help in addressing the issue? --- Additional comment from lkundrak(a)redhat.com on 2007-10-15 11:19:10 EDT --- Are you confident this is a Grub issue, not a Kernel one? Are any kernel guys in CC? Could you please run dmidecode to find out what BIOS version do you have? Are there any BIOS updates available for the machine? Did you try applying them? --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2007-10-15 17:26:54 EDT --- I am pretty sure this is a Grub problem. It hangs before it prints the first kernel message. It also hangs when doing a "blocklist" command after printing a handful of blocks. I last tried Grub with BIOS version 1.1.7. There is a more recent version (1.1.10) that I haven't tried grub with. I also tried lilo with the lba32 option, and grub with forcelba option, thinking it might be a problem with LBA32 support but lilo worked regardless and grub hung. --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2007-10-19 13:47:21 EDT --- I upgraded the BIOS to version 1.1.10 and still has the Grub hang problem. --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:32:52 EDT --- Nothing has changed on Fedora 8 - in fact, it's gotten worse. I could use Fedora 7 x86_64 without any special boot parameters but of course, grub never worked but lilo has indeed worked. All of my mentions here refer only to x86_64 as I gave up trying to run i386 on these systems a while back. Upgraded to Fedora 8 and simply cannot even boot from Rescue disc - it hangs with an error... PCI: MSI quirk detected. MSI deactivated pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 ACPI Exception (processor_core-0819): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126] *** last line repeats 2 more times *** Real Time Clock Driver v1.12ac Non-volatile memory driver v1.2 Linux apgart interface v0.102 Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled and there it stops...never proceeds. The only way I've been able to get Fedora 8 Linux Rescue CD or CD Image from boot.iso to boot is to pass 'acpi=off' I will attach dmidecode and lspci --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:33:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=256041) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=256041) output of dmidecode on Dell Optiplex 320 --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:34:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=256051) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=256051) output of lspci -vv from Dell Optiplex 320 --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:40:40 EDT --- I'm gonna vent a bit here... This isn't getting fixed. See bugzilla 219043 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219043 This all began on Fedora 5 (Fedora 6 for me) and continued on Fedora 7 and now has gotten worse in Fedora 8 Grub has NEVER worked on these Dell Optiplexes...as far as I can tell, for anyone ever. I am using Lilo-22.8 I could get i386 working only if I passed ridiculous kernel parameters such as pci=nomsi all-generic-ide but until Fedora 8 (2.6.23.1-49.fc8) I didn't have to sacrifice the unborn on x86_64. Now it requires both Lilo and apci=off PLEASE - PLEASE - PLEASE do something --- Additional comment from lkundrak(a)redhat.com on 2007-11-12 19:27:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The only way I've been able to get Fedora 8 Linux Rescue CD or CD Image from > boot.iso to boot is to pass 'acpi=off' (In reply to comment #14) > I could get i386 working only if I passed ridiculous kernel parameters such as > pci=nomsi all-generic-ide but until Fedora 8 (2.6.23.1-49.fc8) I didn't have to > sacrifice the unborn on x86_64. Now it requires both Lilo and apci=off This is a kernel thing. Hopefully kernel people will be able to do more than us, bug #379201 for the kernel part. --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-14 14:27:54 EDT --- OK - primarily concentrating on grub issues then, I have lilo installed and I can get it to boot - kernel params per kernel-tracking bugzilla are now 'pci=noacpi timesource=acpi_pm' lilo works but I have to manually run lilo command after each kernel update grub as has been widely reported never seems to work on these systems. I have updated BIOS to latest - here is latest output of dmidecode... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=258581 # grub-install /dev/sda Installation finished. No error reported. This is the contents of the device map /boot/grub/device.map. Check if this is correct or not. If any of the lines is incorrect, fix it and re-run the script `grub-install'. # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/sda # cat /boot/grub/grub.conf # grub.conf generated by anaconda # ...snip... #boot=/dev/sda default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora (2.6.23.1-49.fc8) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.23.1-49.fc8 ro root=LABEL=/1 pci=noacpi timesource=acpi_pm initrd /initrd-2.6.23.1-49.fc8.img This will never boot and I have to reinstall lilo again. Is my process correct? --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-21 14:08:00 EDT --- I recognize that the inability to boot on 2.6.23 kernel (Fedora 8) issue is probably more likely to be solved by bugzilla 379201 in kernel-maint but... grub still doesn't work on these systems - at least no one has reported success with getting it to boot. Lilo boots but I can't install kernel updates without manually running 'lilo -v' because grubby code is uncooperative. On fedora-list yesterday... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-November/msg03487.html poster suggests that grub2 worked for him --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-04-04 01:15:01 EDT --- Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2008-04-04 13:22:35 EDT --- This problem still occurs with Fedora 8 and the most recent version of grub, 0.97-19.i386. I am using the most recent BIOS update, 1.1.11, for the Optiplex 320. The machine still hangs while grub is booting the machine. --- Additional comment from poelstra(a)redhat.com on 2008-04-06 15:54:35 EDT --- thanks for the update. changing to ASSIGNED --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-11-26 02:07:26 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2009-01-09 02:02:26 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 513800] New: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513800 Summary: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: kexec-kdump AssignedTo: vgoyal(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com QAContact: lwang(a)redhat.com CC: matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 239244 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #239244 +++ Description of problem: After getting some kernel problems, I finally decided to give kdump a try, but to my surprise, it does not work. Any attempt to use kdump (with sysrq-c or echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger) leads to instant system crash. sysrq does not work anymore at this point and the only solution is hard poweroff. I see that FC7 does not ship kernel-kdump package anymore, but since FC7 kernel is built with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE, it should be fine as kdump kernel I presume. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-2.6.21-1.3116.fc7 How reproducible: 100% reproducible. Steps to Reproduce: boot kernel with crashkernel=128M@16M option run service kdump start run sysctl kernel.sysrq=1 press sysrq-t or echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger Additional info: The system is DELL Latitude D620 laptop with Intel Core2 Duo T7200 CPU, 2G RAM, i686 arch. Latest FC7 stuff from development repo. --- Additional comment from green(a)linuxhacker.ru on 2007-05-14 15:24:47 EDT --- I upgraded to 2.6.21-1.3142.fc7 and the problem is still present. --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-04-03 20:33:50 EDT --- Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-06 21:41:26 EDT --- This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp --- Additional comment from matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com on 2009-07-24 19:47:31 EDT --- I have encountered this problem on Fedora 11. I am following the instructions at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel/kdump.. When I get to the point where I do "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" the box just freezes and no dump kernel is loaded. It just sits there until I reset it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 440580] New: no gpm mouse support in mc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '09

16 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580 Summary: no gpm mouse support in mc Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mc AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stsp(a)aknet.ru QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com,leonard-rh- bugzilla@den.ottolander.nl,stsp@aknet.ru +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194593 +++ Description of problem: Mouse doesn't work in mc. "ldd /usr/bin/mc" doesn't list libgpm, so the mouse obviously is not expeced to work. This is quite bad, unless I am missing something obvious. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mc-4.6.1a-13.FC5 How reproducible: Press the left mouse button and move the mouse. Only the gpm text selection happens. You can't go to menu or move the mc cursor with the mouse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 456393] New: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393 Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: texlive-texmf AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: uckelman(a)nomic.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++ Description of problem: Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0) is two years newer and has far more features. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 504899] New: mailx man page description doesn't match mailx implementation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mailx man page description doesn't match mailx implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504899 Summary: mailx man page description doesn't match mailx implementation Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mailx AssignedTo: varekova(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat3(a)zacglen.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: p.van.egdom(a)gmail.com, redhat3(a)zacglen.com, dmitry(a)butskoy.name, varekova(a)redhat.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 188313 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #188313 +++ Description of problem: The options for mailx descriped in the mailx man page does not match the implementation of mailx. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mailx-12.4-1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run "man mailx" 2. use that information to try to use /bin/mailx 3. Actual results: Many options fail. For example, the "-e" option is described in the man page, but running "mailx -e" produces: mailx: invalid option -- e Usage: mail [-iInv] [-s subject] [-c cc-addr] [-b bcc-addr] to-addr ... [-- sendmail-options ...] mail [-iInNv] -f [name] mail [-iInNv] [-u user] Expected results: The options described in the mailx man page should match what the mailx program accepts. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 250992] ExcludeArch: ppc64 - Missing ocaml blocks f7 builds
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '09

31 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250992 Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '09

31 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org> 2009-07-31 10:55:41 EDT --- Just to clarify, the package does include translations but due to a bug I haven't identified yet, has not been able to use those translations since the days of python 2.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '09

31 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature, Translation Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 189660] Emblems have no localized name
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '09

31 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189660 Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> 2009-07-30 00:36:49 EDT --- BTW, I'm more than happy to try Live CDs of Fedora 12 Rawhide, but I can't find any at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> 2009-07-30 00:01:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355637) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355637) Xorg.0.log over DVI with BenQ LCD on Fedora 11 Live CD with *nomodeset* This time, I booted the live CD with nomodeset The Resolution chosen (1024x768) was still less than the resolution of the display, but is the same resolution that Fedora 10 allows on this DVI connection. This is the same monitor (BenQ FP91G+) as in the previous test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #355636|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #229401|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #229411|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #234871|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> 2009-07-29 23:44:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355636) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355636) Xorg.0.log over DVI with BenQ LCD on Fedora 11 Live CD Booting the Fedora 11 x86_64 live CD, with default options This is the Xorg.0.log (without an xorg.conf, as it is a live CD). This is also with a new monitor (BenQ FP91G+), attached over DVI only (VGA port unplugged) The displayed resolution should be 1280x1024, not the the 800x600 it chose. This means it isn't the fault of the screen, but the way Fedora probes the video modes on the outboard DVI connector. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jul '09

30 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax(a)redhat.com, | |xgl-maint(a)redhat.com Component|xorg-x11-drv-i810 |xorg-x11-drv-intel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 183338] adding a domain to search: lost by dhcp when network restarts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183338 Penelope Fudd <kernel(a)pkts.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kernel(a)pkts.ca --- Comment #12 from Penelope Fudd <kernel(a)pkts.ca> 2009-07-29 14:07:57 EDT --- I'm also tinkering with SEARCH in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0. More precisely, I need to add two domains to the search list, and override the dhcp-provided dns server, like so: SEARCH="domain1.com domain2.com" DNS1=1.1.1.1 DNS2=2.2.2.2 To test it, I do this: # ifdown eth0 # rm /etc/resolv.conf* # killall dhclient # ifup eth0 As a result, I get this: # cat /etc/resolv.conf ; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script nameserver 1.1.1.1 nameserver 2.2.2.2 search domain1.com # cat /etc/resolv.conf.save ; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script search domain1.com domain2.com nameserver 192.168.217.2 As you can see, typing 'ifup' creates resolv.conf and resolv.conf.save. The resolv.conf has the correct (overridden) dns servers and only one search domain, while the resolv.conf.save has the wrong (dhcp) dns server and the correct search path. What's crazy is that the correct information is all coming from the same file (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0). I even tried extra quotes: SEARCH="'domain1.com domain2.com'", the quotes show up in resolv.conf.save but not in resolv.conf, which is unaffected. I wonder if this bug is why someone decided to start over with NetworkManager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199812] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [ffff81007ffa6810] 'on' is spewed repeatedly on the console
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jul '09

29 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199812 --- Comment #36 from Andrew Ziem <ahz001(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-28 21:39:50 EDT --- The issue still exists in 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 (no special boot options tested). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mbarnes(a)redhat.com |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |a.badger(a)gmail.com Resolution|CANTFIX | --- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-28 15:21:13 EDT --- Sure. But the usual proceedure is to continue in the same bug report. If you'd like to start with a fresh bug report, fell free to open one and then close this one with a pointer to that one so everyone understands what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- | --- Comment #12 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-28 13:20:11 EDT --- Why? I thought we merged already. In any case, the review comments are over two years old and no longer apply. If Fedora is still insisting on these reviews, then this one needs to be restarted from scratch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2009-07-28 12:55:27 EDT --- I still see gtkhtml3 in rawhide; is it your intention to remove it from the distribution? It not, it still needs to pass a merge review at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #10 from Matthew Barnes <mbarnes(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-28 11:15:44 EDT --- This review is too outdated to continue. Closing as CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jul '09

28 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 --- Comment #12 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-07-28 11:09:30 EDT --- As mentioned before, the illegal fork that is distributed by redhat does not support UTF-8. If you like to get working UTF-8 support, you need to upgrade to the original software at: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ http://cdrecord.berlios.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #26 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> 2009-07-27 15:57:12 EDT --- (In reply to bug #510360 comment #1) > Fixed, until there are stock Hungarian man pages in which case it'll become a > bug to own the dir I hadn't thought of that, which makes it even more important to stick to one place for the directory ownership. Should one of the 19 locale above, be it Hungarian, Portuguese, Danish or Chinese etc. be supported by a future man or man-pages package it will suddenly make the client packages' current fix a bug to remove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510359, which changed state. Bug 510359 Summary: Man pages under /usr/share/man/sv: Add directories to man package or is "sv" a broken locale? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510359 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #25 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> 2009-07-27 15:33:03 EDT --- *** Bug 510359 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net Bug 220265 depends on bug 510360, which changed state. Bug 510360 Summary: Unowned directories in hunspell-1.2.8-4.fc11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510360 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED --- Comment #24 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> 2009-07-27 15:31:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I'm not really sure whether jwhois really should own /usr/share/man/sv/man1 I agree, the same would need to be owned by fakeroot, dcraw and even shadow-utils as well. > and I'm not sure, whether this is conform to the packaging guidelines as well. (In reply to comment #22) > Robert: Packaging guideline is to: "Own all directories you create but none of > the directories of packages you depend on. Additionally no package in Fedora > should ever share ownership with any of the files owned by the filesystem or > man package." > As filesystem and man-pages are not going to own those dirs, packages which do > create those directories(and use them for their files) should own them. So a packager that encounters a man path that is unowned by man/filesystem asks repoquery as to --whatprovides this path and ends up with jwhois, fakeroot or some other package. If he reads the guidelines to the letter instead of coowning this man path he might as well just depend on one of these packages ... What I'm trying to say is that the guidelines are there to explain how to package up things and not how to create strange scenarios. The next packager with /usr/share/man/sv/man1 will also not know what to do and will probably do the wrong thing (whatever the right thing is). I think either a locale is broken, so it is the packager's responsibility to remove or adjust the locale of the man page, or it needs to be owned by man. Ownership of directories means that the contents are related to the owner, and the man pages of say dcraw-8.91-1.fc11.x86_64 fakeroot-1.12.2-21.fc11.x86_64 jwhois-4.0-13.fc11.x86_64 shadow-utils-4.1.2-13.fc11.x86_64 that suddenly are required to own all subdirs from /usr/share/man/sv/ are completely unrelated to each other. Ivana, please reconsider, I understand that you feel like this "pollutes" your package with folders you don't directly need, but the other solution is to pollute many more packages with he same, and if feels much uncleaner to do so in not man related packages. And the above example shows that the same stray ownership is being multiplied by four (dcraw, fakeroot, jwhois and shadow-utils now need to own the dirs of the subtree below /usr/share/man/sv/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 --- Comment #11 from Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-27 09:13:51 EDT --- Did you try isoinfo -R -l -i foo.iso or isoinfo -J -l -i foo.iso? Maybe it will help read utf-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 459530] Security: Mailman private archives are available to all local users
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459530 H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 459530] Security: Mailman private archives are available to all local users
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '09

27 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459530 H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #9 from H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com> 2009-07-26 20:34:07 EDT --- Confirmed in Fedora 10. Doubt Fedora 11 is any different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239244] attempt to use kdump just freezes the box
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '09

26 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239244 Matt Castelein <matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com | --- Comment #5 from Matt Castelein <matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com> 2009-07-25 20:35:50 EDT --- Reopened as bug 513800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228953] Unable to use gpg-agent + input methods
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '09

25 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228953 Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '09

25 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Johan Kok <johan-fedora(a)deds.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide Flag| |needinfo?(steve(a)silug.org) --- Comment #24 from Johan Kok <johan-fedora(a)deds.nl> 2009-07-25 08:45:14 EDT --- Changing version back to rawhide and ping. Steven, how close are we to finishing this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239244] attempt to use kdump just freezes the box
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239244 Matt Castelein <matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com --- Comment #4 from Matt Castelein <matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com> 2009-07-24 19:47:31 EDT --- I have encountered this problem on Fedora 11. I am following the instructions at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel/kdump.. When I get to the point where I do "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" the box just freezes and no dump kernel is loaded. It just sits there until I reset it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 179072] _dl_debug_state() RT_CONSISTENT called too early
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179072 Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|jakub(a)redhat.com |schwab(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 393631] krdc: missing menu icon
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393631 Ngo Than <than(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Ngo Than <than(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-24 08:47:45 EDT --- It's fixed in kdenetwork-4_2_98-1_fc12. IMO it's not worth doing update for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242011] pydev plugin should have a pre-configured python environment
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '09

24 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242011 Felix Schwarz <felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz(a)oss.schwarz.e | |u -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 204170] elfutils don't pass testsuite on alpha
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jul '09

23 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204170 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Roland McGrath <roland(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(qboosh@pld-linux. | |org) | --- Comment #51 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:50:05 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #52 from Roland McGrath <roland(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-23 15:38:51 EDT --- These bugs are fixed in current Fedora 10/11 updates of elfutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 162686] /dev/root permissions should be 0640 (root.disk)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jul '09

23 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162686 Gilbert E. Detillieux <gedetil(a)cs.umanitoba.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |11 --- Comment #20 from Gilbert E. Detillieux <gedetil(a)cs.umanitoba.ca> 2009-07-23 12:35:08 EDT --- This is still a problem under Fedora 11... brw-------. 1 root root 8, 2 2009-07-23 11:23 /dev/root Is anyone ever going to fix this simple bug, or should I just give up on attempting to reopen it for future Fedora releases? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 320681] Midnight Commander default installation please
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Jul '09

23 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320681 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 393631] krdc: missing menu icon
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393631 Ngo Than <than(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(than(a)redhat.com) | --- Comment #16 from Ngo Than <than(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-21 12:02:48 EDT --- It's good that you remind me. I will take a look at this. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 393631] krdc: missing menu icon
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393631 Steven M. Parrish <smparrish(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(than(a)redhat.com) --- Comment #15 from Steven M. Parrish <smparrish(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-21 11:52:21 EDT --- You have an update on this Than? -- Steven M. Parrish - KDE Triage Master - PackageKit Triager Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 207571] Fix the dictionary proliferation problem
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jul '09

21 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207571 Bug 207571 depends on bug 219777, which changed state. Bug 219777 Summary: Have vim use hunspell and hunspell dicts directly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 198359] Package dictd lacks IPv6 support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '09

20 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198359 Tore Anderson <tore(a)fud.no> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tore(a)fud.no --- Comment #7 from Tore Anderson <tore(a)fud.no> 2009-07-20 15:13:23 EDT --- This bug should be re-opened as it is present in F11: tore@wrath:~$ getent hosts lust.v6.fud.no 2001:16d8:ee47:0:210:a7ff:fe04:b403 lust.v6.fud.no tore@wrath:~$ strace -ff -econnect dict -v -h lust.v6.fud.no test No configuration connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.1")}, 28) = 0 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.1")}, 28) = 0 Cannot connect to any servers tore@wrath:~$ strace -ff -econnect dict -v -h 2001:16d8:ee47:0:210:a7ff:fe04:b403 test No configuration connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Cannot connect to any servers The strace reveals that it does not even attempt to open the connection to the v6-only address. Tore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 251106] Unable to load kdump in FC6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '09

20 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251106 Chris Ward <cward(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|CustomerVerified | Verified| |Customer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '09

20 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 Riumin Oleksii <contact_info(a)r75a7.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |contact_info(a)r75a7.org --- Comment #22 from Riumin Oleksii <contact_info(a)r75a7.org> 2009-07-20 02:20:26 EDT --- I have the same problem - icon appears and immediately disappears in the desktop. After this the same error occured. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '09

20 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Tony Fu <tfu(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|jparsons(a)redhat.com |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '09

19 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #21 from Martin F <martinrssf(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-19 04:33:42 EDT --- I guess I spoke too soon. Here are more details: Fedora 11: 1. Insert DVD, enter passphrase when requested 2. icon of the unencrypted volume appears in the desktop, but it disappears as nautilus is launched, and nautilus shows the encrypted volume icon 3. Mount and umount from command line works 4. eject from nautilus works, as long as I don't do eject from command line So the workaround is: Insert dvd, enter passphrase; mount and umount from command line; eject from gnome/nautilus. Subsequent closing of DVD drive causes button press eject to not work. The only way to eject is command line eject. once this is done, re-inserting DVD causes the same problem as before: asks for passphrase, then complains that org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Disks.Error.Busy: One or more block devices are holding /dev/sr0. The same error when trying to eject from nautilus, until the next reboot. But mount/umount/eject from command line works as usual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '09

19 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 Martin F <martinrssf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martinrssf(a)gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Martin F <martinrssf(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-19 04:05:46 EDT --- I myself had this problem and haven't paid attention until I saw this bug report referred from bug#122241 in bugs.launchpad.net (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122241) recently. Here is my result in Fedora 11: 1. Insert DVD 2. gnome-mount asks for passphrase; enter one 3. DVD volume appears in the desktop (yeah!) 4. Double-click to open it 5. nautilus launches, the icon disappears from desktop, and the icon is shown in nautilus 6. clicking the icon from nautilus asks for passphrase again, then complains that it's already given the passphrase, but nothing is mounted in /media. 7. 'mount /dev/mapper/devkit-disks/luks-* /mnt/cdrom' from command line works 8. umount and eject works from command line 9. ejecting from nautilus gets complaint that /dev/sr0 is busy used by another module, and eject fails. 10. Subsequent insertion of dvd gets request for passphrase but complains about /dev/sr0 busy. Nautilus shows the icon but no desktop icon. Eject gives the same complaint as above with failure. 11. command line mount/umount/eject all still works. For now, that's the workaround: Insert dvd, enter passphrase, then simply mount, umount, and eject from command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222180] resizing gnome-terminal doesn't display size tooltip under compiz
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '09

19 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222180 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krh(a)redhat.com, | |mclasen(a)redhat.com Component|gnome-terminal |compiz AssignedTo|besfahbo(a)redhat.com |krh(a)redhat.com QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228427] reenable apt-get mirror-select?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jul '09

18 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228427 Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |512518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 179759] Ant should provide $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179759 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pcheung(a)redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 179759] Ant should provide $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179759 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:48:27 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> 2009-07-17 18:57:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=354235) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=354235) Patch to ant.spec to provide symbolic links to jar files in $ANT_HOME Ping, hello? Still an issue with F-11. I have an updated spec file ready to go for this. Successful koji test build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1483273 I can check it in and build if that is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #46 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> 2009-07-17 11:45:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > (In reply to comment #43) > > ... > > > It fixes the problem here. > > ... > > > Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 1/1 > ... > > WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping > > ^^^ hmm is that new? > > -Eric No, I was getting the "WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping" before the grubby patch as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #45 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-17 11:01:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) ... > It fixes the problem here. ... > Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 1/1 ... > WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping ^^^ hmm is that new? -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #44 from Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-17 10:03:12 EDT --- Thanks for the patch Eric -- applied and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #43 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> 2009-07-17 07:59:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > Probably requires more testing, etc etc. It fixes the problem here. Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 1/1 get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned Success WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory Running DKMS auto installation service for kernel 2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 nvidia (185.18.14-2.1.fc12): Installing module. ...... Installed: kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12 Complete! Thanks Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jul '09

17 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Paul Bolle <pebolle(a)tiscali.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pebolle(a)tiscali.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #42 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> 2009-07-16 19:35:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > seems to work for me; blkid_get_devname(cache, token, <value>) returns the name > of the device matching the token TOKEN=value string, or the device itself if > "token" isn't a name, value pair. > > Probably requires more testing, etc etc. Thanks, I will give it a go and report back. Here are some grubby rpm's with the patch. http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/rpm/devel/ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1480779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen(a)redhat.com, | |katzj(a)redhat.com --- Comment #41 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-16 17:13:16 EDT --- I'm hitting this in rawhide. It looks like getpathbyspec() is fubar. (disclaimer: despite owning blkid for 3 years I managed to never -really- look at it until it was dispatched to util-linux-ng \o/ !) Anyway, getpathbyspec() is doing: if (!strncmp(device, "LABEL=", 6)) return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "LABEL", device+6); else if (!strncmp(device, "UUID=", 5)) return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "UUID", device+5); but blkid_get_tag_value() returns the value of the tag specified in the 2nd arg for the device in the 3rd arg. But we're passing in the UUID or the LABEL value itself in the 3rd arg. So then blkid is going off trying to access "899c0289-ec5b-4143-8856-fc9eb0b8f798" and read it. Replacing the above with: Index: grubby-7.0/grubby.c =================================================================== --- grubby-7.0.orig/grubby.c +++ grubby-7.0/grubby.c @@ -427,11 +427,7 @@ static char * getpathbyspec(char *device if (!blkid) blkid_get_cache(&blkid, NULL); - if (!strncmp(device, "LABEL=", 6)) - return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "LABEL", device+6); - else if (!strncmp(device, "UUID=", 5)) - return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "UUID", device+5); - return device; + return blkid_get_devname(blkid, device, NULL); } static enum lineType_e getTypeByKeyword(char * keyword, seems to work for me; blkid_get_devname(cache, token, <value>) returns the name of the device matching the token TOKEN=value string, or the device itself if "token" isn't a name, value pair. Probably requires more testing, etc etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Thomas Müller <thomas(a)mathtm.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas(a)mathtm.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 332781] No sound for non-root users
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332781 dann(a)ics.uci.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dann(a)ics.uci.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Perry Myers <pmyers(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jparsons(a)redhat.com |rmccabe(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux(a)googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #40 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> 2009-07-16 10:18:46 EDT --- Well with the attention this bug has received :-( I might as well get used to editing grub.conf by hand every kernel update. Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.67.rc2.git9.fc12.x86_64 295/826 get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned Success WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template Updating : python-2.6-10.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 204446] Xclients.d files not sourced by Xclients script
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204446 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.9-9.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 204446] Xclients.d files not sourced by Xclients script
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204446 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-07-16 03:24:58 EDT --- xorg-x11-xinit-1.0.9-9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206629] Add South African keyboard
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '09

16 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206629 Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |11 --- Comment #9 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> 2009-07-16 03:05:10 EDT --- Still present in F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 npajkovs(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |npajkovs(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|rrakus(a)redhat.com |npajkovs(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 189473] bonding: xenbr after boot broken, after xend restart networking gone altogether
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189473 Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246325] need LANGUAGE settings for translation fallbacks
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246325 --- Comment #8 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> 2009-07-15 05:35:21 EDT --- @petersen: The gettext/glibc/gdm solution does seem like the correct long term approach for the correct behaviour. We're still faced however with the immediate that a user can't set this at all unless they know something about LANGUAGES, most localisers don't even know anything about that :). We'd still need the ability for a admin or user to override such a setting if it emerges in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 461559] SELinux is preventing gnome-power-man (xdm_t) "execstack" to < Neznámé > (xdm_t).
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461559 Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar(a)redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 05:05:48 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 480564] the Offline ＆ Disk Space settings doesn 't do any effort on the folder properties
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480564 Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar(a)redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(vbian(a)redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 05:05:34 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 457252] The BÉPO keyboard is AZERTY with GDM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457252 Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar(a)redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 05:05:20 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( ц ) at 8pt and 10pt
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar(a)redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Noura El hawary <nelhawar(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 05:04:49 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 198395] Package openhpi lacks IPv6 support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198395 Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 167827] after xrandr, vnc.so informs client of old screen size, but image matches new size
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167827 Adam Tkac <atkac(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Component|vnc |tigervnc CC| |atkac(a)redhat.com Resolution|WONTFIX | QAContact|dkl(a)redhat.com |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | --- Comment #11 from Adam Tkac <atkac(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 03:40:51 EDT --- This bug is still present, moving back to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237631] TreeView with TreeModelSort highlight problem.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237631 Thomas Woerner <twoerner(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #15 from Thomas Woerner <twoerner(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 03:28:12 EDT --- Still a problem in F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168776] server-generated directory listing contains bomb icon for directory named 'core'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168776 Radek Bíba <rbiba(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #8 from Radek Bíba <rbiba(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-15 01:45:46 EDT --- httpd-2.2.11-8 (F11) is still affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199256] exim unconditionally requires postgres and mysql libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199256 Tim Jackson <rpm(a)timj.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Tim Jackson <rpm(a)timj.co.uk> 2009-07-14 17:55:36 EDT --- This was actually implemented a while ago in F-10. Thanks David! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246363] (nautilus:29798): WARNING **: Can not caclulate _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246363 --- Comment #9 from Nivag <gavinflower(a)yahoo.com> 2009-07-14 17:36:26 EDT --- We are now using Fedora 10 & 11 - no sign of this problem on these versions of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222180] resizing gnome-terminal doesn't display size tooltip under compiz
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222180 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 192952] suphp selinux policy should be simular to suexec
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192952 Chris Jones <rollercow(a)sucs.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 192952] suphp selinux policy should be simular to suexec
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192952 Chris Jones <rollercow(a)sucs.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|x86_64 |All Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 301861] File playback seeking using the slider does not work for FLAC files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301861 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #13 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2009-07-14 14:32:01 EDT --- I just tested a flac that has seek tables on F-10 x86_64, xine-lib-1.1.16.3-2.fc10: - Works fine with amarok-2.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64 - kaffeine-0.8.7-3.fc10.x86_64 and xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc10.x86_64 have same issues as in comment 6. So, reopening, but the fact it works fine in amarok (xine is the only phonon backend I have installed), I suppose it might not be a xine-lib problem after all, but maybe one in both kaffeine and xine-ui. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222180] resizing gnome-terminal doesn't display size tooltip under compiz
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222180 --- Comment #10 from Joachim Namislow <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2009-07-14 14:01:07 EDT --- Issue still present for current "rawhide". Plugin "resizeinfo" should be enabled by default. Somebody please reopen the bug and set the version to "rawhide". Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 211882] /etc/xinetd.d/rsync is installed, but rsync does not require xinetd
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211882 --- Comment #7 from Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> 2009-07-14 13:43:52 EDT --- Still exists in Fedora 11, but I'm not sure now whether having a hard dependency on xinetd is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235955] Rhythmbox Column resizing does not follow cursor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235955 --- Comment #11 from Charles R. Anderson <cra(a)wpi.edu> 2009-07-14 13:41:24 EDT --- This is fixed in Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 165460] Issues when auto-create maildir folders in /var/mail
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165460 Dmitry Butskoy <dmitry(a)butskoy.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #12 from Dmitry Butskoy <dmitry(a)butskoy.name> 2009-07-14 13:23:40 EDT --- Reopen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 180020] unsupported tags should be filtered out
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180020 Sander Hoentjen <sander(a)hoentjen.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206629] Add South African keyboard
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206629 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak(a)v3.sk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 198395] Package openhpi lacks IPv6 support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198395 Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature, Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #13 from BJ Dierkes <wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.org> 2009-07-14 11:56:16 EDT --- Honestly, my only concern is with EPEL... but the changes make sense for both. If you consider that EPEL was created for *Enterprise Linux... it would be safe to assume that a SysAdmin installing fail2ban would know very well what they want and how they want to implement. Forcing the install of shorewall on a SysAdmin in the enterprise just seems rude. ;) For Fedora I can see your point as the audience would more than likely have less SysAdmins and more Users/Power Users. Either way... if you are installing fail2ban you probably also know how to do something like 'yum search shorewall'. If you go with something like my initial patch in comment #9, you can just throw in a few lines of comment into %{_sysconfdir}/fail2ban/action.d/shorewall.conf that let you know "hey, you probably need to install x, y, z packages via yum to enable shorewall support". Or the patch in comment #10, is obvious or understood that you need to install fail2ban-shorewall to enable shorewall support. Either way, thank you for giving this tracker some attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)mattdm.org> 2009-07-14 11:02:59 EDT --- Re: EPEL — the Fedora package also has a hard-requirement of shorewall. Re: anecdotal reference — In that case, patch #351351 (don't split the package, but don't have a hard requirement) seems like the way to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '09

14 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #11 from Axel Thimm <axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net> 2009-07-14 03:12:26 EDT --- I think this is just an EPEL bug, why not fix it in the EPEL cvs? I'd go with something like BJ's patch in comment #10. For anecdotal reference just comparing the use of fail2ban with iptables and shorewall by google hits it comes up with something like 1:4 (15,500:69,800), which means that a large portion of fail2ban users will expect shorewall support out of the bix and will be surprised to have to look for further subpackages, or to have to manually install some dependencies of fail2ban. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #10 from BJ Dierkes <wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.org> 2009-07-11 12:28:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=351352) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=351352) Patch to add a subpackage for shorewall config and dependency This is an alternative to patch 351351... depending on how the maintainer wishes to proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '09

11 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #9 from BJ Dierkes <wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.org> 2009-07-11 12:27:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=351351) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=351351) Simple patch to remove the unnecessary requirement of shorewall -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 BJ Dierkes <wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.or | |g --- Comment #8 from BJ Dierkes <wdierkes(a)5dollarwhitebox.org> 2009-07-10 18:50:53 EDT --- Would be nice if we could get some attention on this bug primarily due to its age. There are similar requests downstream for the EPEL packages, though the EPEL maintainer is waiting for Fedora to make this change first. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Jul '09

10 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 --- Comment #22 from David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> 2009-07-10 05:45:29 EDT --- And in Fedora 11... 5 years now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #23 from Ivana Varekova <varekova(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-09 02:28:28 EDT --- Thanks Dennis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #22 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-09 02:06:27 EDT --- Robert: Packaging guideline is to: "Own all directories you create but none of the directories of packages you depend on. Additionally no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files owned by the filesystem or man package." As filesystem and man-pages are not going to own those dirs, packages which do create those directories(and use them for their files) should own them. Dennis: Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '09

09 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade(a)redhat.com Component|ibus |ibus-m17n AssignedTo|phuang(a)redhat.com |pnemade(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 231162] Small leak in kadm5_get_init_creds
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231162 Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ti | |cket/Display.html?id=5475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 231162] Small leak in kadm5_get_init_creds
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231162 Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #6 from Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-08 17:05:37 EDT --- Looks like 'client' is still leaked in 1.7, moving to Raw Hide so that we don't lose this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #21 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de> 2009-07-08 16:38:24 EDT --- I'm not really sure whether jwhois really should own /usr/share/man/sv/man1 and I'm not sure, whether this is conform to the packaging guidelines as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dgregor(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-08 15:58:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Dennis: please could you look which packages owns a file in unowned directories > and create a bug directly on these component? Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510364 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510362 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 366081] Hardcoded icons
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366081 Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kreilly(a)redhat.com |harald(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510357 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '09

08 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ivana Varekova <varekova(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dgregor(a)redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #19 from Ivana Varekova <varekova(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-08 06:58:15 EDT --- Hello, man-pages package does not have any file from these subdirectories - so it has no sense to reassign the bug to this package. Dennis: please could you look which packages owns a file in unowned directories and create a bug directly on these component? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik(a)redhat.com, | |varekova(a)redhat.com Component|filesystem |man-pages AssignedTo|ovasik(a)redhat.com |varekova(a)redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-07 11:02:13 EDT --- Good to have up2date list. As written in Comment #10, lang related manpages dir should be owned by those packages. Maybe that bugzilla could be used as tracker bug and separate bugzillas against those man-pages-lang components could be created. Anyway, reassigning to man-pages, they could decide how to handle this - I don't think it should be done by filesystem package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228953] Unable to use gpg-agent + input methods
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228953 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> 2009-07-07 09:16:01 EDT --- Looks like upstream has worked to make this better, http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2009-July/025222.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 173854] Bring media mountpoints up to date
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173854 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #9 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-07 08:37:51 EDT --- Changing to rawhide again to prevent autoclosing again, I'll take a look if something really depends on those ghosted dirs later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pknirsch(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|pknirsch(a)redhat.com |ovasik(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 173854] Bring media mountpoints up to date
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '09

07 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173854 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pknirsch(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|pknirsch(a)redhat.com |ovasik(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235961] default network doesn't take into account the host network
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235961 Mark McLoughlin <markmc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Version|9 |rawhide Blocks|150225(FC7Target) | Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | --- Comment #9 from Mark McLoughlin <markmc(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-06 08:50:18 EDT --- Nothing has changed on this front, still applies to Fedora 12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|x86_64 |All -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '09

06 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|illogical mapping for |illogical mapping for |non-QWERTY keyboard with |non-QWERTY keyboard with |scim-m17n |m17n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '09

05 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 sangu <sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com --- Comment #39 from sangu <sangu.fedora(a)gmail.com> 2009-07-05 10:06:46 EDT --- in rawhide < mkinitrd-6.0.90-1.fc12.x86_64 > $ yum update kernel [...] get_netlink_msg returned Success WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template [...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243933] setting vnc for gui login clobbers gnome task bar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '09

05 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243933 David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms(a)iinet.net.au --- Comment #10 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2009-07-05 05:50:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > information task bar is hosed. that is the one that holds the active app icon > when minimized. also holds the desktops. > anytime you min an app, it seems to go to the lower right of the window and vanish. > also, during the bootup a message pops up that X windows found a different > keyboard setting than expected. john, I had a similar issue when I logged into the gnome gui twice (once via vnc and the other via the console). This is resolved in F10 with current updates. If you are still interested in this bug, perhaps you could perform your original test with a current Fedora release. If it is resolved, IMHO, it would be worth updating the closed|wontfix status to closed|current release, and updating the version to the Fedora release you tested with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247329] Keyboard conflict message gets shown immediately after login - multiple login related
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '09

05 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247329 David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Version|9 |10 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2009-07-05 05:44:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Unfortunately, a lot of things won't work right, right now if the same user is > logged in more than once. I'm not sure which version exactly resolved the issue, as I had not tested since last year. Someone has been working hard, since this keyboard error is no longer given when you log in to gnome twice (eg vnc & console), with the following versions: gnome-desktop-2.24.3-1.fc10.x86_64 gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kbd-1.12-31.fc9.x86_64 libgnomekbd-2.24.0-1.fc10.x86_64 libxkbfile-1.0.4-5.fc9.x86_64 system-config-keyboard-1.2.15-5.fc10.noarch xkeyboard-config-1.4-8.fc10.noarch xorg-x11-drv-keyboard-1.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64 xorg-x11-xkb-utils-7.2-7.fc10.x86_64 As you might expect: - having the same user start firefox in each session doesn't work (firefox says profile is in use). - if logged into console gui when the vncserver is started, se-troubleshooter gives a warning regarding consolekit. This doesn't seem to disrupt basic desktop functionality. - if test is logged in at the console when the vncserver is started at the same time by test, then the login sound for the vnc log in is played through the console machines speakers. Anyway, closing since the original issue is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242468] Wrong init script
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '09

03 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242468 Nicola Soranzo <nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Nicola Soranzo <nsoranzo(a)tiscali.it> 2009-07-03 19:37:16 EDT --- Current Fedora guidelines for SysV-style Initscripts can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221418] lx5000 driver gets stuck in write loop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '09

02 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221418 --- Comment #6 from Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-02 13:40:00 EDT --- This has never worked in the lx5000 driver since it was introduced into the ghostscript SVN repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 175347] grubby doesnt preserve comments in grub.conf
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175347 Karsten Weiss <knweiss(a)gmx.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |knweiss(a)gmx.de --- Comment #7 from Karsten Weiss <knweiss(a)gmx.de> 2009-07-01 19:01:17 EDT --- The problem with grubby's parser is that it bundles the title entries from 'title' line to 'title' line. Here's an example: 1 # header skipped 2 title kernelfoobar 3 .... 4 .... 5 6 # comment for memtest 7 title memtest 8 .... 9 .... The parser will read the two titles and put them into two data structures: The first will contain lines 2-6 and the second lines 7-9. Now, if we remove the kernelfoobar package, grubby will be called to remove the kernel entry in grub.conf and consequently it'll remove lines 2-6 from grub.conf and thereby remove the comment above the memtest title because it associates it with the kernelfoobar package and not with the memtest title. This can be easily tested without destroying the local grub.conf: 1. cp /boot/grub/grub.conf ~/grub.conf 2. Append lines 6-9 at the end of ~/grub.conf 3. Execute grubby -c ~/grub.conf --remove-kernel=<KERNELABOVEMEMTEST> -o ~/grub.conf2 4. Verify that the comment line "# comment for memtest" is gone. So this bug is real. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187382] Possible security issue
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187382 Bug 187382 depends on bug 187353, which changed state. Bug 187353 Summary: CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187353] CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 Luke Macken <lmacken(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #17 from Luke Macken <lmacken(a)redhat.com> 2009-07-01 12:42:35 EDT --- Closing per mutual agreement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 183338] adding a domain to search: lost by dhcp when network restarts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183338 Jón Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn(a)cl.cam.ac.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harald(a)redhat.com, | |jmoskovc(a)redhat.com Component|dhcp |system-config-network Flag|needinfo?(jon.fairbairn@cl. | |cam.ac.uk) | --- Comment #11 from Jón Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn(a)cl.cam.ac.uk> 2009-07-01 07:10:54 EDT --- Re 1: It's headless, so the network service Re 2: I've investigated this extensively this morning (and I don't think it's worthwhile attaching any of the versions of the files). Contrary to Comment #5, system-config-network does NOT set SEARCH in any /etc/sysconfig/network* file, nor does it read SEARCH from any of them. It currently (system-config-network-1.5.97-1.fc11.noarch) simply changes /etc/resolv.conf (this seems to be a regression). If SEARCH is not set in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 but there is a search line in /etc/resolv.conf, dhclient ignores this latter and creates a search line from what it gets from the dhcp server. This seems like reasonable behaviour. Whether it's correct I'll leave up to you... If SEARCH is set in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 dhclient uses this when creating the new /etc/resolv.conf This also seems reasonable (etc). It seems clear to me that system-config-network should read and write SEARCH in /etc/sysconfig.*/ifcfg-$device. So I reckon the bug really is in system-config-network. Assuming that you'll agree with that contention (David), I've changed the component back to system-config-network This bug hat been hanging around since before Fedora 8, and it bites me every time I upgrade to another version of Fedora, so I'd be grateful if it were resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage July 2009