https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115909
--- Comment #41 from Robert Mason <nullpost-redhat(a)yahoo.co.uk> ---
I've managed to narrow down the exact behaviour:
1. Computer boots, numlock and the light is on.
2. On the login screen, numlock and the light is on.
3. Type my password, which includes a capital letter. After pressing shift the
numlock light goes off! But it is actually still on.
4. Press the numlock key twice to get it on with the light also on.
5. Now pressing shift doesn't affect it.
I do not think that pressing shift should cause the numlock light to turn off.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f3l8NUdO4V&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638
David Lehman <dlehman(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(dlehman(a)redhat.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #41 from David Lehman <dlehman(a)redhat.com> ---
There has been no progress on this due to other work having higher priority.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UdTqVd1AFg&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
--- Comment #29 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> ---
FWIW, even Sun/Oracle agrees that the "nuclear clause" makes that license
non-free, as do the lawyers who've reviewed it in the past.
In the not-too-distant past, Sun and Oracle were willing to relicense works
containing the "nuclear clause" to omit that clause. It might be worth filing a
bug with the relevant upstream to request relicensing there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lVxmoneEh7&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
Felix Schwarz <fschwarz(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fschwarz(a)fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #28 from Felix Schwarz <fschwarz(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
(In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #13)
> I'm a bit surprised this package is in Debian, as the license should
> probably be considered non-free for Debian too.
Debian considers this clause as a "warranty disclaimer" and not as a license
restriction: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00034.html
(just for completeness, I know that Fedora has different rules+obligations when
it comes to legal terms).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QWWdOBLHn2&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342
Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |iorlov89(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #74 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> ---
*** Bug 1195402 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=aPxsOi4mW7&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342
Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sheldon.corey(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #73 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> ---
*** Bug 1197974 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=90R9dcr4PO&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228427
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|pmatilai(a)redhat.com |moceap(a)hotmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> ---
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning
to the new owner of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fxOCqOFBXo&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: system-config-printer
John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> has denied Bug Zapper
<triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for John Mellor
<john.mellor(a)gmail.com>'s needinfo:
Bug 598291: Should determine make and model for Windows print shares
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598291
--- Comment #14 from John Mellor <john.mellor(a)gmail.com> ---
I no longer have a Windows machine that I can provide information about. Can
someone else please provide the required information?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638
Marc Bejarano <bugzilla.redhat(a)beej.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dlehman(a)redhat.com
Flags| |needinfo?(dlehman(a)redhat.co
| |m)
--- Comment #40 from Marc Bejarano <bugzilla.redhat(a)beej.org> ---
hi david,
has there been any progress on this? is it blocked by some other work?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=waOrIBOgnX&a=cc_unsubscribe