Fedora Core 1.91: apt-get upgrade error: unsigned package(s)
by Weirong Zhu
My current system is Fedora Core 1.
I use apt-get to upgrade packages.
my apt version is 0.5.15cnc5
Now I am trying to upgrade my system to Fedora Core 1.91
However, When I did the apt-get upgrade: I got bellow error informations:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
731 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 removed and 98 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/739MB of archives.
After unpacking 254MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Checking GPG signatures...
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libselinux_1.8-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libattr_2.4.1-3_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libacl_2.2.7-4_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/hwdata_0.114-1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/hotplug_3%3a2004%5f03%5f11-1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/pcre-devel_4.5-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/pcre_4.5-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gpm_1.20.1-45_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/modutils_2.4.26-14_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-tools_1.60-24_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/initscripts_7.49-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/shadow-utils_2%3a4.0.3-21_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OKUnsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-minimal_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5
OKUnsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/GConf2-devel_2.6.0-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/GConf2_2.6.0-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/Guppi_0.40.3-18_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/binutils_2.15.90.0.1.1-2_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/a2ps_4.13b-37_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/arpwatch_14%3a2.1a13-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libbonobo-devel_2.6.0-2_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libbonobo_2.6.0-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gdb_6.0post-0.20040223.14_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OKUnsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-smp#2.6.4-1.300_2.6.4-1.300_i686.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/dhcp_1%3a3.0.1rc12-4_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/glibc-headers_2.3.3-20_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/fedora-logos_1.1.23-1_noarch.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-mime-data_2.4.1-3_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gtksourceview_0.9.2-2_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/less_382-3_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-snmp-utils_5.1.1-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-snmp-perl_5.1.1-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/net-snmp_5.1.1-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-source#2.6.4-1.300_2.6.4-1.300_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-utils_1%3a2.4-9.1.126_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/libpcap_14%3a0.8.2-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/man_1.5m2-5_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/neon_0.24.4-4_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/netpbm-devel_10.19-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/netpbm-progs_10.19-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/netpbm_10.19-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.3-20_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/nss%5fldap_217-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/rp-pppoe_3.5-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/rpmdb-fedora_1%3a1.91-0.20040331_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-swat_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-client_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-common_0%3a3.0.3-1.pre1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/slocate_2.7-8_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tcpdump_14%3a3.8.2-1_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-fonts_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-afm_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-dvips_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-latex_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-xdvi_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vnc_4.0-1.beta4.9_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vnc-server_4.0-1.beta4.9_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-common_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned
/var/cache/apt/archives/anaconda-runtime_9.92-0.20040331011453_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/aumix_2.8-8_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/cdrdao_1.1.8-3_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/ftpcopy_0.6.2-6_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/glibc-profile_2.3.3-20_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gpm-devel_1.20.1-45_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gstreamer-tools_0.8.0-3_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/htdig_3.2.0b5-7_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-doc_2.6.4-1.300_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/sylpheed_0.9.10-2_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-doc_2.0.2-13_i386.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-X11_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm: sha1
md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-enhanced_1%3a6.2.403-1_i386.rpm:
sha1 md5 OK
Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/xinitrc_3.39-1_noarch.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
E: Error: 73 unsigned package(s)
0 package(s)s with unknown signatures
0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I have imported all the keys as I know.
Any idea for the error I got?
Thanks very much!
my mirror-list now is :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rpm http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386 os
updates
rpm-src http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386
os updates
# Fedora Core (Kernel.org, San Francisco California, USA)
rpm http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os updates
rpm-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os
updates
# Fedora Core (University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii, USA)
rpm http://download.fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os updates
rpm-src http://download.fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 os updates
# Fedora Extras (University of Southern California, USA)
rpm http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386 stable
rpm-src http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/fedora/fedora/ fedora/1.91/i386
stable
# Fedora Extras (Kernel.org, San Francisco California, USA)
rpm http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 stable
rpm-src http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora.us/fedora fedora/1.91/i386 stable
# Macromedia (USA East, Rutgers University, New Jersey)
rpm http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/macromedia/apt fedora/1 macromedia
rpm-src http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/macromedia/apt fedora/1 macromedia
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
20 years
VPN on Fedora with PPTPD
by bsebastien@bluewin.ch
Hi at all,
I am making a VPN with pptp protocol but i haven't find any RPM for
pptpd installation or the MSCHAPv2 cryptage for the MS protocol !
Is this normal ?
We aren't able to make this with a Fedora ?
Is-it RPM for this if yes ?
Thanks for all answers !
PS : Sorry for my english !
PS2 : Sorry if 2 messages have been send !
20 years
Re: zip disk format
by Gerhard Magnus
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>
> > I'd like to be transfer files on a zip disk between work (a mac
> > environment running OS X) and home (Linux). How should I format the
> > disk so I can mount it on the Linux system and what parameters should
> > I use for the mount command? It seems the mac OS X system can read
> > from and write to any format, but I can't get anything to work on the
> > Linux end. Could it be something in my /etc/fstab file that's
> > interfering with this?
>
> Most likely, yes. You either have the wrong device configuration
> (/dev/sd?) or you're trying to mount the wrong FS type, or your kernel
> doesn't support the specific FS needed. Posting the error msgs would be
> very helpful...
>
> The first assumption is easy to prove: can you mount _any_ zip disk? If
> you can, the device configuration is ok, so we're down to the FS.
>
> If you're sure what FS the disk has been formatted with, you can
> override fstab settings. For example, here I have:
>
> /dev/hdd4 /mnt/zip auto noauto,owner,kudzu 0 0
>
> and I can do
>
> mount -t vfat /mnt/zip
Thanks -- I've finally been successful mounting my zip disk, but only as
superuser and with the command augmented to:
mount -t vfat /dev/hdd4 /mnt/zip
Is there some way I can do this other than as root and without having to
type so much?
Jerry
20 years
Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1394
by Parameshwara Bhat
Hello Friends,
I recently posted a mail asking if anybody could guide me as to how to
share 'kppp' in fedora core1 with non-root users.It is a home PC shared by
members of the family.I would not share root password for fear of ignorant
actions affecting security/stability of system.Presently any non-root user
has to supply root password to connect(dial up ) to ISP.
I have followed all actions suggested by Scott Burns and Stone Beat but
that has not solved the isuue.Basically what I did was to SUID on
/usr/sbin/kppp and edit /etc/pam.d/kppp to comment out a line.Nothing has
worked.
Are there any more ideas on what could be or what should be done ?
Coming from MSWindows environement,I would think security being so tight
as not allow non-root users of desktop an internet connection very crazy.
I chose Power Desktop Installation and a decent user-oriented installation
should have set this automatically . Is Linux not to be used on desktops
and layman users?
Parameshwara Bhat
On Mon, 26 Mar 2004 22:06:01 -0500 (EST), <fedora-list-request(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
20 years
n00b install question
by Jim Cavera
My apologies for the (possibly) dumb question. I DL'd
the CD images and am trying to install on a Dell
Lattitude LS.
Config: Dell Lattitude LS
Pentium III, 400 MHz
128Mb RAM, 10gig HDD
As per the LinuxLaptop instructions, I cleaned all
hidden partitions off the drive. I now have a
completely empty, newly formatted, 10gig partition.
And no OS.
When running the anaconda installer, I get the error
(immediately following inital VM loading):
This CPU does not support long mode. Use a 32 bit
distribution.
What does this mean, how can I fix/avoid it (no, I
won't buy another laptop)? Note that though I am a
professional progammer, I am completely new to Linux
and haven't used *nix in many years. So speak slowly.
TIA.
- Jim
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
20 years
PPTP VPN in Fedora
by bsebastien@bluewin.ch
Hi,
I want to make a PPTP VPN via the PPTPD Deamon...
1) I can't find Fedora RPM for this deamon
2) After installing it by sources, i can't use the mschap cryptage
because the kernel don't know it..
Thx for your help and SOrry for my english because I'm french !
20 years
RE: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
by Chalonec Roger
Thanks will check it out.
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of James Kosin
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:16 PM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chalonec Roger" <Chalonec.Roger(a)pbgc.gov>
To: <lsomike(a)futzin.com>; "For users of Fedora Core releases"
<fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
| Thanks for the reply.
|
| My users are very unsophisticated. I would like to be able to scan
| the uploaded file but do not know if ClamAV or another can detect
| viruses on FTPed files, especially if the file is infected with a
| Windows virus but stored on a Fedora server.
|
| R
|
<<--snip-->>
Roger,
ClamAV detects most if not all Windows Viruses.
They have modules for Apache, Samba, and other mail agents; but,
currently none for FTP. There is one for tFTP I believe.
Check out http://www.clamav.net/3rdparty.html ....
Good Luck,
James Kosin
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
20 years
RE: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
by Chalonec Roger
Thanks for the reply.
My users are very unsophisticated. I would like to be able to scan the
uploaded file but do not know if ClamAV or another can detect viruses on
FTPed files, especially if the file is infected with a Windows virus but
stored on a Fedora server.
R
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mike Klinke
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:39 AM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Best AntiVirus for Fedora Core 1
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 06:18, Chalonec Roger wrote:
> I am wondering if I need antivirus. I am using an FTP/SFTP server.
> Does ClamAV scan uploaded files that are SFTP? Do I need an OS level
> antivirus? Some have told me that Av is not needed on Linux. I am
> not planning on running windows stores. A user will send a file to
> the server with SFTP and a user will retrieve the file via SFTP.
> However, both users will likely be using windows based systems.
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
Only you can answer this question. How is your system used and what
expertise do your users have?
For example, take the scenario where a Windows user uploads a file
that has a virus. A couple of month's later another Windows user
downloads the same file and infects his machine. Will you know, for
certain, that the cause of the second user's infection was the file
that was downloaded or will it take another few months and another
few users getting infected to figure out what's going on?
Regards, Mike Klinke
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
20 years
cant establish a dialup connection
by Wayne Jensen
I use dialup to connect to the internet with. For
quite some I've connected using a Best Data brand
external serial modem. Just within the past week and
a half I haven't been able to connect at all except
for when I reboot into windows and use the win modem
that came with the machine. Any suggestions? Comments?
-Wayne J.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
20 years
Can't find libstdc++.so.2.8
by Matthew Benjamin
Does anyone know where to get libstdc++.so.2.8 for Fedora release 1? I have been trying to install mcafees command line scanner and it is looking for this rpm. It works on redhat 8.0 and below haven't tried above. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Or does anyone know of an alternative virus scanner for Fedora or Linux?
mattB.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
20 years