Palm with USB
by GMZ
Hello !
I have a very strange problem with Fedora and my PalmPilot!
When first start Kpilot after a reboot, Kpilot says "Device is ready" and
that's all! After a certain time palmpilot interrupt because of timeout!
When I start Kpilot at the second time everything is ok!
Does anybody have any ideas ?
PalmPilot m505
Thanks,
Georg
20 years
RE: undefined reference while building non SMP kernels
by Floros Athanassios (athanassios.floros＠intracom.gr)
Thanks, that really solved my problem. However, I must point out that
searching the archives for "active_load_balance" produced no results.
Athanassios
-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Wickert [mailto:christoph.wickert@web.de]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4:08 PM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> Any ideas why this error occurs even with the original non SMP kernel
> configuration?
Because you did not rum "make oldconfig"?
Run make oldconfig twice (!) before you start compiling. Has been
discussed on this list a mio times, search the archives for
"active_load_balance" if you want more info.
Christoph
20 years
RE: unresolved symbol schedule_work while building non SMP kernel s
by Floros Athanassios (athanassios.floros＠intracom.gr)
Thanks. The post you mention had the solution to my problem
Athanassios
-----Original Message-----
From: Andre Costa [mailto:acosta@ar.microlink.com.br]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4:30 PM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: unresolved symbol schedule_work while building non SMP
kernels
...
I've seen this before. You have to manually create some files on the
ALSA source tree before compiling it. Check out this post:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?postid=701246#post701
246
I guess newer kernels/ALSA fixed this (not sure though).
HTH
Andre
--
Andre Oliveira da Costa
20 years
RE: can't configure vmware 3.2.1 on fc1
by Ow Mun Heng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Lafferty [mailto:rich+rhl@lafferty.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:03 PM
> To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> Subject: Re: can't configure vmware 3.2.1 on fc1
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:58:37AM -0300, Alexandre Strube
> <surak(a)casa.surak.eti.br> wrote:
> >
> > And what about running vmware on 2.6? Still no success here...
>
> No success until VMware, Inc. distributes vmware modules for 2.6, even
> -- but there's nothing anyone can do about that but them, since their
> modules are proprietary.
Hey Rich..
I've got VMware to work under 2.6 Although I'm using vmware 4.0.
So.. That might not be of any help.. :)
20 years
RE: BitTorrent rpm
by Ow Mun Heng
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Drabb [mailto:JDrabb@tampabay.rr.com]
> On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 18:03, Charles Howse wrote:
> > Sooooo..., I uninstalled all that, re-installed the
> original rpm from
> > http://torrent.dulug.duke.edu/btrpms/, and ran the command
> it reccomends from
> > a shell, and I'm now downloading FC2-test-binary-i386 at 123.7 KB/s.
>
> Try http://azureus.sourceforge.net/. It is a great front-end
> for BT.
> It can manange multiple .torrent files and makes creating
> .torrents very
> simple. It is a Java app so runs on Linx/MS Windows/Mac. It uses SWT
> for the GUI (same as Eclipse) so it uses your native toolkit
> (GTK+2/Win32) over the (IMO) ugly swing, is fast and light weight.
I'm using Azurues both on Linux and Win. I wouldn't call it
light-weight exactly. it takes a huge foorprint in terms of memory..
Running top
I see
SIZE = 224M
RSS = 30M
SHARE = 49844
%MEM = 6.1 % (of my 512MB RAM)
SO.. at 30MB, it's not exactly lightweight. I see bout the same memory
usage in WIndows too.
But hey, I like azureus.
20 years
Changing primary user group
by mjwestkamper
I need to set up a number of users and assign them to a primary group. For
example, I am setting up a FC1 box as a CVS server. The approach I am using
is to set up a number of cvs users and want to assign their primary group as
CVSUSER.
The GNOME applet doesn't seem to allow it. (add user / change properties)
And I have tried the traditional handtools but apparently there is someting
else that prevents adduser/etc from really working.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Mike
20 years
Basic fstab and firewire question
by Michael A. Peters
I have a drive dedicated to flac files.
here's the fstab entry:
LABEL=flac /flac ext3 defaults 1
2
-=-
Works perfectly like that. The partition is currently /dev/hdb1 and
takes up the entire drive (flac files are huge)
At any rate - I'd like to put this drive into a firewire housing - will
I need to make any changes to the fstab or will the LABEL take care of
figuring out where it is and dealing with it that way?
I'm assuming the latter - but I've never dealt with firewire drives in
linux before.
20 years
ADSL Load Balancig
by pablo.gietz＠nuevobersa.com.ar
Do you know How to do load balancing with FC1?
We use
route add default equalize dev ppp0 dev ppp1
and this work for 5 minutes, after that all the traffic goes through
only one of the interfaces.
Any ideas?
Thanks
20 years
KPPP-for users
by Murali P
I lost track of the person ( Parameshwar ),who posed
the question about kpp for users.The solution is to
edit the file : /etc/pam.d/kppp and change the
following line >
auth sufficient pam_rootok.so
The above line allows only root to run kppp.Change to
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_permit.so
ON my FC1 system this works.Try out.
Murali
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Insurance Special: Be informed on the best policies, services, tools and more.
Go to: http://in.insurance.yahoo.com/licspecial/index.html
20 years
RE: Mysterious hangs with Fedora
by rbp＠netcanvas.com
> >
> > The hardware is a Tyan 1U rackmount, 2.4 P4, 1GB DDR, two 120GB IDE
> > disks in
> > RAID1 (Promise FastTrack controller onboard). Hardware
> worked before
> > for months, no problem. All fans ok, so overheating does
> not seem like
> > a possibility. The only changed variable is the upgrade from RH9 to
> > FC1. However, same behaviour with very different kernels, that also
> > confuses me. Some quirk with glibc maybe?
> >
> > Anyone here experiencing something similar? Any thoughts? Before i
> > switch back to RH9 and see if it helps..
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
>
> Promise Fastrack RAID is your culprit.
>
> Forget using any parallel ATA RAID product made from Promise with
> Linux.
> I've been round and round this subject, and the best they give you
> is source code, but how can you build the source when there's no drive
> recognized. I recommend going to 3WARE for any ATA RAID (SATA or
> parallel) with Linux.
>
> I hear that Promise SATA is supported in the kernel by default, but if
> you've got what I think you've got, you're probably want to use the
> on-motherboard Promise RAID chipsets. This server is best relegated
> to becoming a Windows server if you want RAID with the Promise
> chipset.
>
> Select your hardware carefully.....
I'm not crazy about these controllers too, but nevertheless i can't forget that
it worked just fine before with RH9, with whatever kernel i'd throw in it.
Just as long as you compile Promise's partial source code of the driver using
the new kernel's source, and then make sure you have a properly created initrd
image for module loading on boot. Just like i do now with FC1.
I have two other identical machines using this controller with no problem,
difference is that they still run RH9.
And this also happens with the same exact kernels used when running RH9, still
there on /boot...
For this, i do not think Promise controller is the culprit. It was there
before.
>
> BC
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
20 years
