Does the Asus Xonar DG sound card work well in F14?
by Richard Shaw
I'm having issues with my builtin audio. At first I thought it was the
new speakers I bought. I know they're not quite as my Cambridge
Soundworks but the external 5.1 decoder is having issues so I figured
it was time. I hear a high tinny noise and assumed it was the cheap
amplifier but after plugging in some old but nice SGI headphones I
still heard it.
To that end I'm in the market for an inexpensive sound card but don't
want to go too cheap and get something equivalent to my onboard audio.
I found the Asus Xonar DG[1] for a decent price but it uses the
CMI8786 which is supported in alsa 1.0.24 (which I have) OR kernel
2.6.38, which I don't. I'm really hoping the OR is right and it's not
supposed to be an AND.
Interestingly enough this chip doesn't appear to have internal volume
controls so I'll have to rely on PulseAudio.
Anyone have this card working (well)? Even though it's not a big
investment I'd like to know someone has it working.
Richard
10 years, 8 months
Wireless adaptor DWL G-122 E1 /Fedora14 &Intel pentium(r)dual 3.00Ghz
by Vicenç Meĺendez
Dear users members,
I would like to use a wireless adaptor DWL G122 witha desktop
machine (Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.00 Ghz with memory 1001 MiB.
Kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686. GNOME 2.32.0
I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb firmware
adaptors with no results.
Any help is welcome.
Kind regards
Vicenc Melendez
------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 Jazztel - Jazz Telecom, S.A.U. http://www.jazztel.com
Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo.
Dear users members,
I would like to use a wireless adaptor DWL G122 witha desktop
machine (Intel (R) Pentium (R) D CPU 3.00 Ghz with memory 1001 MiB.
Kernel 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686. GNOME 2.32.0
I have tried Ralink r-2571w/rt2671 A B G network (rt73usb firmware
adaptors with no results.
10 years, 10 months
X server in F14 horribly slow
by JD
After upgrading to F14, switching from one workspace to another is
excruciatingly slow!!
I am a gnome user.
Can this be attributed to Gnome or to the X server
or to the ATI Radeon driver?
10 years, 10 months
Oh no! Something has gone wrong. (GNOME 3 login issue)
by Valent Turkovic
Hi guys and galls,
I'm testing few older gpraphics cards and few nvidia cards have issue
when using nouveao module that after typing in login info I don't see
GNOME Shell nor compatible mode dekstop but just get message saying:
"Oh no! Something has gond wrong. A problem has occured and the system
can't recover. Please log out and try again."
This looks like Fedora tried to load GNOME Shell but it didn't detect
card features correctly so it fails. My question is why GNOME doens't
just switch to compatible mode instead of crashing?
Which logs are relevant with this issue? Should I look at X log or
GNOME Shell has some of its own logs, and if it has where are they
located? I'm interested to see what causes the issue.
I tried also loading nvidia proprietary module but it looks it doesn't
support latest X in Fedora 15.
I'm willing to work with devels to track down bugs and make Fedora 15
and GNOME Shell better but need some guidance.
Cheers,
Valent.
--
follow me - www.twitter.com/valentt & http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com
linux, anime, spirituality, wireless, scuba, linuxmce smart home, zwave
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, MSN: valent.turkovic(a)hotmail.com
10 years, 10 months
F15 doesn't believe my hardware clock uses local time
by Sam Varshavchik
On my laptop, it seems that at every boot the clock is offseted by my
timezone.
Date/Time properties shows "System clock uses UTC" unchecked. This is a dual-
boot with WinXP, so I must keep the bios clock on local time. Yet, it seems
that when I boot the bios clock is read as UTC nevertheless.
Before I begin a long and painful adventure in pulling apart with what's
happening with systemd/initscripts, anyone has any clues where I should look?
10 years, 11 months
Routing not working
by Dan Track
Hi,
I've got a server where I've got two interfaces (vlan 200 and vlan
300). If I get traffic coming into vlan 200 but sourced from a network
that vlan 200 subnet doesn't know about, the server should send the
traffic out of it's default gateway i.e. vlan 300, but this isn't
happening. If I do a tcpdump on both interfaces I can see traffic
coming in on vlan 200 but failing to even be present on the return in
vlan 300 (not even present on vlan 200 - did it for sanity sake).
However, if I put in an explicit route in stating that this unknown
network exists out of vlan 200 then everything works fine.
My routing table is like this:
ip route
166.14.134.144/28 dev vlan200 proto kernel scope link src 166.14.134.154
159.156.137.32/28 dev vlan300 proto kernel scope link src 159.156.137.42
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link
default via 159.156.137.33 dev vlan300
vlan 200 and vlan 300 sit on the same bonded interface. Trunking is
set on the switch.
It's almost as though the OS (kernel) is saying that you can't take
input from one int and then send it out another int. Are there some
parameters I need to change?
Thanks for any help.
Dan
10 years, 11 months
Yum update from Fedora 14 -> 15 WARNING!
by n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using inittab mode
1,3, or 5. In view of this it appears I will have to reinstall Fedora 14.
cpp4ever
10 years, 11 months
