amavis stopped logging to maillog after upgrade
by Alex
Hi,
I recently performed an upgrade from fedora20 to fedora21, and now
amavisd-new no longer logs to /var/log/maillog (or anywhere else that
I can find.) The /etc/amavisd.conf file hasn't changed. I've also made
sure rsyslog is still running, and is receiving logging info from
postfix.
# grep log /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf
$log_level = 2; # verbosity 0..5, -d
$log_recip_templ = undef; # disable by-recipient level-0 log entries
$DO_SYSLOG = 1; # log via syslogd (preferred)
$syslog_facility = 'mail'; # Syslog facility as a string
$syslog_priority = 'debug'; # Syslog base (minimal) priority as a string,
# egrep -v '^$|^#' /etc/rsyslog.conf
$ModLoad imuxsock # provides support for local system logging (e.g.
via logger command)
$ModLoad imklog # provides kernel logging support (previously done by rklogd)
$SystemLogRateLimitInterval 0
$ActionFileDefaultTemplate RSYSLOG_TraditionalFileFormat
$IncludeConfig /etc/rsyslog.d/*.conf
kern.none /dev/console
kern.* /var/log/kern.log
*.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none /var/log/messages
authpriv.* /var/log/secure
mail.* -/var/log/maillog
cron.* /var/log/cron
*.emerg *
uucp,news.crit /var/log/spooler
local7.* /var/log/boot.log
I don't understand if this is a journalctl error or not. The logs are
going to the standard journalctl log. There is also no
/var/log/amavisd.log file present.
Thanks for any ideas.
Alex
8 years, 8 months
F22 - dnf extreme slow
by Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen
Hi,
After upgrading from F21 to F22 and switching to dnf, my update/install
process is very very slow.
Eg. dnf install tmux took more than 5 minutes. Most of the time I just
give up after waiting more than 30 minutes.
In F21 it would have taken a few seconds.
Please advise:
# dnf clean all
Cleaning repos: fedora updates
Cleaning up Everything
# time dnf -4y update
Fedora 22 - x86_64 347 kB/s | 41 MB 02:01
Updates ...
(After 15-20 minutes, it finally starts downloading packages)
[...]
(2/836): kernel-debug-core-4.1.3-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
57 kB/s | 21 MB 06:12
(3/836): kernel-core-4.1.3-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm
53 kB/s | 19 MB 06:14
[MIRROR] kernel-debug-devel-4.1.3-200.fc22.x86_64.rpm: Curl error (28):
Timeout was reached for
ftp://mirror.easyspeedy.com/fedora/updates/22/x86_64/k/kernel-debug-devel...
[Connection time-out]
Regards
Martin
8 years, 8 months
Acer C720 Support
by Zach Villers
Sorry if I am posting to the wrong list. I'm wondering what needs to happen to get Anaconda to work on a Chromebook laptop with F22 and beyond?
I have been trying to install Fedora on my Acer C720 Chromebook. Rawhide, F22, and F21 .iso's written to a usb drive via dd will not get past the grub splash screen. I've tried changing the boot parameters, to no avail. The C720 had a working Xubuntu install on it, so I know I have set the machine's bios up properly. I have been able to find this information regarding a possible syslinux issue; http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-February/023209.html
I was able to install with a Fedora 20 netinstall image using these instructions; https://onemoretech.wordpress.com/2014/03/28/booting-the-acer-c720-with-f...
I just pointed Anaconda to an F22 workstation mirror.
There are reports for various Chromebook issues on bugzilla; https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=chromebook so I know that people have been able to install. I would be willing to test any patches that can be provided, but when I tried the patch of syslinux suggested in the syslinux mailing list, I still could not get the iso i created with (what I thought was the patched version of syslinux) to work. TIA and apologies for the ramble.
8 years, 8 months
dnf autoremove -- removes explicitly installed thunderbird
by A.J. Bonnema
Hey all,
Anyone noticed that after successfully installing thunderbird with "dnf
install thunderbird" the statement "dnf autoremove" selects thunderbird
for removal?
I would like hear if anyone else has this problem.
Regards, Guus.
8 years, 8 months
vmware user agent
by François Patte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
Checking what apps are launched at loggin time with xfce, I found a
"vmware user agent". vmware is not installed on my machine, why do I
have all these packages installed:
open-vm-tools-9.10.2-1.fc21.x86_64
open-vm-tools-desktop-9.10.2-1.fc21.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-vmware-13.0.2-8.20150211git8f0cf7c.fc21.x86_64
Is it safe to suppress vmware user agent from the apps launched at
start up?
Thank you.
- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlXAYSkACgkQdE6C2dhV2JW9iwCfZ0wUv8Ekoh2blAgWI26fNBkZ
HycAoJ0CgZS73jrtNOQ1JkGGe8yBABeO
=9HMi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8 years, 8 months
Re: Replacement rack server recommendations
by Steve Berg
I haven't used the H330's but I do have quite a few R610's, R620's, R720xd's, R730xd's and a few other various systems where I work. They all run SciLinux, (6.x and 7.x). We've been very happy with them so far, got half a dozen or so in the ordering pipeline too.
Some of the smaller RAID cards are Window's only so be careful that you check the specs before you buy. Got burned on one of those a few years back, my fault, I didn't read the fine print. Most of my systems have H7xx or H8xx RAID controllers.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Stainburn [mailto:gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk]
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:24:27 +0100
Subject: Re: Replacement rack server recommendations
On Monday 03 August 2015 14:09:13 Todor Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can recomment IBM M4/M5 Series (now it's Lenovo). They are newer than
> yours, they play well with CentOS/RHEL (got plenty installations). You
> have IPMI/dual PSU/dual CPU.
> The RAID is LSI, which is supported and you can monitor it with the
> tools from LSI.
> I am sure you can find many companies in UK, that offer this hardware.
>
> Regards,
Hi Todor,
Thanks for that. I am looking at Lenovo at the moment.
I'm also looking at the DELL PowerEdge R630 with the H330 RAID controller.
Google seems to come up with conflicting reports on this though, some saying
it works fine while others are having trouble with the RAID controller not
showing any drives when doing the install.
Does anyone have experience of this kit?
--
users mailing list
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
8 years, 8 months
httpd failed to start on F21 with current updates
by Tommy Pham
Hi folks,
Anyone having problems with httpd unable to start?
journalctl -xe shows:
Aug 03 14:09:16 d-f21-web sshd[1071]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session
opened for user root by (uid=0)
Aug 03 14:10:17 d-f21-web httpd[1106]: AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably
determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using
fe80::5054:ff:fe43:91f9. Set the 'ServerName' directive globally to
suppress th
Aug 03 14:10:17 d-f21-web httpd[1106]: (98)Address already in use: AH00072:
make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:443
Aug 03 14:10:17 d-f21-web systemd[1]: httpd.service: main process exited,
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Aug 03 14:10:17 d-f21-web systemd[1]: Failed to start The Apache HTTP
Server.
-- Subject: Unit httpd.service has failed
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
but netstat shows:
[root@d-f21-web ~]# netstat -tanp
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
684/sshd
tcp 0 184 a.a.a.a:22 b.b.b.b:46779 ESTABLISHED
1071/sshd: root@pts
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN
684/sshd
tcp6 0 0 :::9090 :::* LISTEN
1/systemd
and httpd's error_log:
[Mon Aug 03 14:10:17.831003 2015] [core:crit] [pid 1106] (22)Invalid
argument: AH00069: make_sock: for address [::]:443, apr_socket_opt_set:
(IPV6_V6ONLY)
(98)Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address
[::]:443
(98)Address already in use: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address
0.0.0.0:443
[Mon Aug 03 14:10:17.831058 2015] [mpm_prefork:alert] [pid 1106] no
listening sockets available, shutting down
[Mon Aug 03 14:10:17.831061 2015] [:emerg] [pid 1106] AH00019: Unable to
open logs, exiting
[root@d-f21-web httpd]# uname -a
Linux d-f21-web 4.0.8-200.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 10 21:09:54 UTC 2015
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
SELinux is disabled.
Thanks,
Tommy
8 years, 8 months
Issue with dnf update after fedup from fc21 to fc22?
by Michael D. Setzer II
Everything seemed to go thru fine with the update, but then running dnf
update ran into a strange issue.
It was trying to remove an old fc21 kernel, and it failed with 3 files. Using
yumex I was alble to remove two of the files with no problem, but the
kernel-core gets a similar message. Tried both of the options it mentions at
the end, but still get the message.
Not sure why it is giving a message about kernel 4.0.8, when it is remove
4.0.5?
Output of dnf update
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:03:32 ago on Sat Aug 1
18:48:59 2015.
Dependencies resolved.
==========================================================
======================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
==========================================================
======================
Removing:
kernel-core x86_64 4.0.5-200.fc21 @System 41 M
Transaction Summary
==========================================================
======================
Remove 1 Package
Installed size: 41 M
Running transaction check
Error: transaction check vs depsolve:
kernel-uname-r = 4.0.8-300.fc22.x86_64 is needed by (installed)
kmod-VirtualBox-4.0.8-300.fc22.x86_64-4.3.30-1.fc22.x86_64
To diagnose the problem, try running: 'rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest'.
You probably have corrupted RPMDB, running 'rpm --rebuilddb' might fix the
issue.
+----------------------------------------------------------+
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor
Guam Community College Computer Center
mailto:mikes@kuentos.guam.net
mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com
http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
Guam - Where America's Day Begins
G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer
http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+----------------------------------------------------------+
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned: 19,471
Processing time: 32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)
BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA 32408662.306644 | SETI 57744168.704351
ABC 16613838.513356 | EINSTEIN 66898810.510895
8 years, 8 months
Re: Kernel panic in 4.1.2-200.fc22.x86_64
by Chris Murphy
> Is this a 32-bit system by any chance?
Duh. Subject.
If you know or are willing to learn how to setup netconsole you might
be able to capture the call trace for a bug report (I just attach the
entire thing I collect rather than "snipping here"). Switching to a
debug version of the problem kernel might also help the kernel dev
team.
Since you're getting a different bug with 4.0.8, I'd give 4.0.9 a shot
and see if either oops appears there. And if it doesn't, then try the
debug version of 4.1.0 and assuming it panics, capture the output with
netconsole.
That way you have debug kernel based capture to attach to the bug. And
you can say, does not occur with 4.0.7, 4.0.9, first appears with
4.1.0 and still happens with 4.1.2 (or 4.1.3 if you're willing to test
it).
And then if you're still feeling industrious by the time all of this
is done, tomorrow there will be a 4.2.0.rc5 build to test against and
you can report whether it implodes too.
--
Chris Murphy
8 years, 8 months
