users October 2023

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

84 participants
69 discussions

[FC8] ssh and CAC card???
by Todd Denniston 17 Sep '24

17 Sep '24

From what I understood, the change to openssh listed in: rpm -q --changelog openssh |less as: "* Wed Jun 20 2007 Tomas Mraz <tmraz(a)redhat.com> - 4.5p1-7 - experimental NSS keys support - correctly setup context when empty level requested (#234951) " was supposed to allow the Common Access Card (CAC) to work with the shipped Fedora 8 ssh. As per NSS usual, everything is undocumented, i.e., `ssh-add --help` does not help at all, and `man ssh-add` points to `ssh-add -s reader` # ssh-add -s 0 Enter passphrase for smartcard: SSH_AGENT_FAILURE Could not add card: 0 # ssh-add -s 1 Enter passphrase for smartcard: SSH_AGENT_FAILURE Could not add card: 1 So does anyone know how to use the possible functionality, or are we reduced to reading the source? -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

4 8

Apache fails to resume after hibernation
by Patrick O'Callaghan 07 Sep '24

07 Sep '24

I've noticed recently that Apache often (or perhaps always) doesn't respond after a system hibernate/resume cycle. After restarting it ('apachectl restart') all is well. I could script an automatic restart after resuming, but I wondered if this is a well-known problem with a simpler solution. poc

4 11

Re: cisco ise
by Patrick O'Callaghan 02 Aug '24

02 Aug '24

On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 16:45 +0000, david richyad wrote: > cisco ise helps safeguard your business. It lets you control access throughout your network, see the user and device details, and stop/contain any threats. You can also use it to enforce security policies throughout your network. As a result, it helps prevent any technical issues and strengthens your cybersecurity measures. In short, you can manage your network security with more ease. Everything can be handled in one place, as opposed to needing multiple different applications open at once. > > https://www.fieldengineer.com/blogs/cisco-ise-deployment-guide Does this have anything to do with Fedora? Advertising is not acceptable on this list. poc

7 11

This list's search engine not working?
by HaJo Schatz 22 May '24

22 May '24

Ever since I stumbled across this list, I seem to have major difficulties searching the archives. Say I want to see my posts to the list (they all have the same footer as below), I believe I could go to http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/ and enter "HaJo" as a search string. Searching in all sections, I get 0 results. Does the search engine ignore me by some reason? BTW -- I've been posting since about June, and when showing the archives sorted by author, I do find my posts. OK, not the most helpful to search for my own posts, but I do have the same issue when searching for given topics. Any other search engine out there indexing this list reliably? Google shows 0 hits on a "site:www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/" search... -- HaJo Schatz <hajo(a)hajo.net> http://www.HaJo.Net PGP-Key: http://www.hajo.net/hajonet/keys/pgpkey_hajo.txt

4 5

Re: Tomcat
by Rahul Sadotra 21 May '24

21 May '24

Hi Michael, --- Michael Folin <michael.folin(a)donator.se> wrote: > how do I install Tomcat i fedora? > can't find it during the installation > If you mean during the installation of Fedora Core itself, then I don't think Tomcat is provided with Fedora Core (please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). This means you will probably need to download Apache Jakarta Tomcat (either binaries, or the source which you'll need to build) and install it. Hope this helps. All the best, Rahul ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

2 1

Help needed: disabling system wide the Caps lock key in GNOME/Xwayland
by Joachim Backes 04 May '24

04 May '24

Hi gys, I'm running F38 with *Gnome/X-Wayland*, and in my environment I do not need (hate it) the *Caps Lock* key.Question: How to realize the disabling system wide, and how to get it working again? Regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 38 (Thirty Eight) 6.4.7-200.fc38.x86_64 Joachim Backes<joachim.backes(a)rhrk.uni-kl.de> https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/

15 18

Cups shared print now showing in Windows
by ToddAndMargo 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

Hi All, Fedora 38 cups-2.4.7-1.fc38.x86_64 cups-lpd-2.4.7-1.fc38.x86_64 My old printer broke, so I had to replace it. I removed the old printer from cups and added the new printer. I set the new printer to network share (and it does over LPD). /etc/printcap: # This file was automatically generated by cupsd(8) from the # /etc/cups/printers.conf file. All changes to this file # will be lost. HLL2300D|HLL2300D:rm=server.acme.local:rp=HLL2300D: Cups-PDF|Cups-PDF:rm=server.acme.local:rp=Cups-PDF: "Cups-PDF" shows in the Windows 10 "add printer" dialog, but my new HLL2300D does not. I have cups-lpd installed, so I just did a manual create port lpd and my new printer works fine from Windows 10. But, why can Windows 10's "Add Printer" dialog find it? Perplexed, -T

2 3

rpm output
by Patrick Dupre 06 Nov '23

06 Nov '23

Hello, If I make a rpm -qa, I got xconsole-1.0.7-2.fc34.x86_64 nautilus-sendto-3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64 --More--error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 132 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>. because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 101000 (28)) Header SHA1 digest: OK error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 134 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>. because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 1111100 (7c)) Header SHA1 digest: OK error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 137 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>. because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 10011 (13)) Header SHA1 digest: OK error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 138 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet because: Signature appears to be created by a non-conformant OpenPGP implementation, see <https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2351>. because: Malformed MPI: leading bit is not set: expected bit 8 to be set in 101101 (2d)) Header SHA1 digest: OK error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 140 Header RSA signature: BAD (header tag 268: invalid OpenPGP signature: Parsing an OpenPGP packet: Failed to parse Signature Packet Can I void these errors? =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com ===========================================================================

5 11

output device changes with pipewire-0.3.83-2
by Frank Elsner 02 Nov '23

02 Nov '23

Hello, has anyone other than me observed the effect that during audio playback to an audio interface the destination device changes to the "build-in audio device." This happens to me occasionally with pipewire-0.3.83-2.fc38.x86_64 and my ZOOM H6 audio interface. Any hint to avoid this welcome. Greeting, Frank

3 5

Google Chrome Update Question
by Tim Evans 01 Nov '23

01 Nov '23

Usually, dnf updates take care of updating Google Chrome. Lately, for the past week or so, however, there's a big pink button in Chrome's status bar labeled "Update," but dnf insists I have the latest version (google-chrome-stable-115.0.5790.110-1.x86_64). If you click this button, it tells you it's unable to update Chrome and asks if you want to re-install. Is this just a new idiot light that means nothing, or is there some sort of conflict with update versions? Thanks.

7 10