Last round of update nailed my networking
by ToddAndMargo
Hi All,
How do I get updates to stop altering my network configuration?
I use a local caching named server (named-chroot)
The last round altered the following:
/etc/named.conf
file is not a link, so should be left alone
(and still not a link)
Altered file:
# Generated by NetworkManager
search netgear.com acme.local # netgear.com ??????
nameserver 192.168.250.1 # address of my gateway
Should have left alone at:
search acme.local
nameserver 127.0.0.1
AND SOMETHING KEEP CHANGING IT BACK to !!!!!
; generated by /usr/sbin/dhclient-script
search netgear.com acme.local
nameserver 192.168.250.1
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno2
Altered file:
BOOTPROTO=none
Should have been left alone at:
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
By the way, DNS1=127.0.0.1 in that file and was
not altered
[Editorial comment]
AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
[/editorial comment]
-T
12 months
Re: Broken by the grub startup after have move whole the system
from one SSHDD more small to a SSD more big by a software acronis
by stan
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 07:18:04 +0000
Dorian ROSSE <dorianbrice(a)hotmail.fr> wrote:
> dear Stan,
>
>
> for move the storage also i have use a version of try from a program
> created by acronis who remove the threat,
I looked them up, and they seem to be a well established company.
>
> sysimage has disappeared since the weekend so i have recreated the
> part sysimage,
Anything done in the live system is lost when it is shut down.
>
> neither chroot and chmod work thus if the SSD is uses encrypted have
> you a kind for repair that or does i need to use the SSD without
> encrypting ?
There probably is a way to enter your unlock password, but I am not
familiar with that.
> from what i remember sda1 is a windows ten GMAO fortunately i update
> this system only one time by year because Microsoft is a factory of
> money the more update live for become the system windows slow in
> addition i understand there are threats but as i was say before a lot
> of update don't maker,
Does it boot? Can you run windows? I don't understand why there is
any mention of Fedora if it is a purely windows drive. Is the fedora
there a virtual machine running under windows?
> I need an advice because you say fedora use NTFS although i have set
> up each start of the setup firstly by UEFI secondly by CSM naturally
> may i force the setup to start each time only by NTFS ?
native fedora cannot use ntfs. It has to use one of ext4, btrfs, or
xfs.
>
> sda2 has never live anymore from the SSHDD and the advice for the
> file fstab can't work as i show below this explaining because the
> root /mnt/sysimage can be readen only by reading :
>
> [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ cat /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab >
> /tmp/install-fstab.txt cat: /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab: Aucun fichier ou
> dossier de ce type [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo cat
> /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab > /tmp/install-fstab.txt cat:
> /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
> [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo touch /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab
> touch: impossible de faire un touch '/mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab': Aucun
> fichier ou dossier de ce type [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo mkdir
> /mnt/sysimage/etc/ mkdir: impossible de créer le répertoire «
> /mnt/sysimage/etc/ »: Système de fichiers accessible en lecture
> seulement
So, there is no fstab. fedora can't run without an fstab.
> "ext4 is the older default, btrfs
> is the newer one. Did fedora ever run from this drive? It shouldn't
> be able to boot. How did you install?"
>
> i know few fedora all ext4 part can work even 2 terabyte of storage
> btrfs can use more of 2 terabyte of storage , from what i remember
> sda1 is the part windows ten however sda2 has never leaven,
>
> I never understood why you force myself to mount the pen USB this
> doesn't maker either you help myself or you stop to help myself,
I don't understand what you are saying here.
>
> i ever ask previously but you answer to the step next so how to
> repair the problem of shell who happen the bash doesn't live ?
When you boot a live system, it has bash on it. By mounting the
problem partition on the sshdd, you can then use the live system's bash
to do the work you want to do, to fix the problems you want to fix,
even if the damaged system doesn't have a bash. If you cannot mount
the damaged system from the working live system, you have no access to
it. So, cannot fix anything.
> mount dev/sda2 can't work because as i have ever say windows ten is
> only on dev/sda1,
It seems you want sdb, but there is no mention of fedora on what you
show of sdb, only on sda.
> i need an explaining for the power on of the pen USB thus as i was
> type previously before the start of the pen USB with the graphic easy
> it ask either the first boot or the second boot finaly if you want
> and if you ask i launch two time the line of command smart who show
> whole parts for happening if fedora have one part root and one part
> home, right ?
But that is the problem, none of the data you have shown from this
system shows a fedora root or home partition. Not on sda, not on sdb.
That is why I said it looks like it is not there.
> thanks you in advance to help myself,
I don't think I am helping. I barely understand what you are saying,
so my suggestions seem to be making things worse. I am giving up
because I think I am wasting my time and yours. You need to find
someone who speaks your language so they understand your requests and
explanations.
I tried, and I failed. Sorry. And good luck.
Je ne pense pas vous aider. Je comprends à peine ce que vous dites,
mes suggestions semblent donc aggraver les choses. J'abandonne
parce que je pense que je perds mon temps et le vôtre. Vous devez
trouver quelqu'un qui parle votre langue afin qu'il comprenne vos
demandes et vos explications.
J'ai essayé et j'ai échoué. Je suis désolée. Et bonne chance.
> ________________________________
> De : stan <upaitag(a)zoho.com>
> Envoyé : mardi 25 avril 2023 21:10
> À : Dorian ROSSE <dorianbrice(a)hotmail.fr>
> Objet : Re: Broken by the grub startup after have move whole the
> system from one SSHDD more small to a SSD more big by a software
> acronis
>
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:27:28 +0000
> Dorian ROSSE <dorianbrice(a)hotmail.fr> wrote:
>
> > dear stan,
> >
> >
> > the setup broken were wear two part for fedora either one root and
> > one home in addtion the fat32 was a windows ten although fedora
> > start with the pen USB unfortunately it start broken firstly the
> > troubleshouting ask either one first boot nor one second boot
> > however it go back for start in easy displaying,
>
> How did you move to the new hard drive? It looks like it didn't
> preserve the existing layout on the old drive if both windows and
> fedora were working there.
>
> >
> > secondly if i want attach the part sdb1 i happen one error
> > explaining by the shell who say that the system is readen only in
> > read :
> Yes, you can display on the screen, but you cannot redirect output to
> a file.
> Show the
> output of
> ls -nd /mnt/sysimage
> You want it to look like this:
> drwxr-xr-x. 2 0 0 4096 May 8 2022 /mnt/sysimage
> with different date.
> The says owner is root (0) and the owner has rwx permissions.
> So, after you have created the directory sysimage, run
> chmod 755 /mnt/sysimage
> Then when you create the chroot, root will be able to write things to
> the file system as it will be read write for root.
> >
> > [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sysimage
> > mount: /mnt/sysimage: ATTENTION: source protégée en écriture, montée
> > en lecture seule.
> >
> > I show the happening from one good line of command :
> >
> > [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ lsblk --fs
> > NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID FSAVAIL
> > FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS loop0
> > squash 4.0
> > loop1
> > ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> > 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85
> > ├─live-rw
> > │ ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> > │ 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85 1,4G
> > 80% / └─live-base
> > ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> > 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85
> > loop2
> >
> > └─live-rw
> > ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> > 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85
> > 1,4G
>
> The above is the live system.
>
> > 80% / sda
> > ├─sda1
> > │ vfat FAT32 8610-1067
> > └─sda2
> > ntfs fedora
> > 62C48A62C48A3875
>
> This is an ntfs filesystem for fedora. fedora will be on ext4 or
> btrfs, depending on when it was installed. ext4 is the older
> default, btrfs is the newer one. Did fedora ever run from this
> drive? It shouldn't be able to boot. How did you install?
>
> Can you boot to the windows on this drive? I don't think it exists
> anymore.
>
> > sdb
> > └─sdb1
> > vfat FAT32 FEDORA-WS-L
> > B099-D599
> > 5,4G
> This drive is all windows formatted, so there is no fedora that I can
> see, and if this is the EFI partition it is using the whole disk.
>
> I would prefer the output of blkid, because it shows more information
> about the partitions.
>
> I don't think there is anything recoverable on these hard drives.
>
> After you have created the /mnt/sysimage directory read write, mount
> it as follows:
> mount /dev/sda2/ /mnt/sysimage
>
> Then run
> ls /mnt/sysimage
> Does it show the root directory of fedora?
> afs bin boot dev etc home lib lib64 lost+found media mnt
> opt proc root run sbin srv sys tmp usr var
> If it doesn't, there is no fedora left.
>
> If it does, you can run the commands like:
> cat /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab > /tmp/install-fstab.txt
>
> Try the commands I gave before, but from the data you have provided so
> far, I think you are going to have to reinstall both windows and
> fedora, since it looks like both of them are gone. It might be
> possible to change the filesystem type on the fedora partition with a
> partition tool, from ntfs to ext4 or btrfs, whichever is correct. If
> grub is trying to read information written as ext4 or btrfs as ntfs,
> nothing is going to work. Have you made any changes to the disk
> information?
>
> You can install directly from the live system if fedora and windows
> are gone.
12 months
RE: Broken by the grub startup after have move whole the system from
one SSHDD more small to a SSD more big by a software acronis
by Dorian ROSSE
dear Stan,
for move the storage also i have use a version of try from a program created by acronis who remove the threat,
sysimage has disappeared since the weekend so i have recreated the part sysimage,
neither chroot and chmod work thus if the SSD is uses encrypted have you a kind for repair that or does i need to use the SSD without encrypting ?
from what i remember sda1 is a windows ten GMAO fortunately i update this system only one time by year because Microsoft is a factory of money the more update live for become the system windows slow in addition i understand there are threats but as i was say before a lot of update don't maker,
I need an advice because you say fedora use NTFS although i have set up each start of the setup firstly by UEFI secondly by CSM naturally may i force the setup to start each time only by NTFS ?
sda2 has never live anymore from the SSHDD and the advice for the file fstab can't work as i show below this explaining because the root /mnt/sysimage can be readen only by reading :
[liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ cat /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab > /tmp/install-fstab.txt
cat: /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
[liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo cat /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab > /tmp/install-fstab.txt
cat: /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
[liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo touch /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab
touch: impossible de faire un touch '/mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab': Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
[liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo mkdir /mnt/sysimage/etc/
mkdir: impossible de créer le répertoire « /mnt/sysimage/etc/ »: Système de fichiers accessible en lecture seulement
"ext4 is the older default, btrfs
is the newer one. Did fedora ever run from this drive? It shouldn't
be able to boot. How did you install?"
i know few fedora all ext4 part can work even 2 terabyte of storage btrfs can use more of 2 terabyte of storage ,
from what i remember sda1 is the part windows ten however sda2 has never leaven,
I never understood why you force myself to mount the pen USB this doesn't maker either you help myself or you stop to help myself,
i ever ask previously but you answer to the step next so how to repair the problem of shell who happen the bash doesn't live ?
mount dev/sda2 can't work because as i have ever say windows ten is only on dev/sda1,
i need an explaining for the power on of the pen USB thus as i was type previously before the start of the pen USB with the graphic easy it ask either the first boot or the second boot finaly if you want and if you ask i launch two time the line of command smart who show whole parts for happening if fedora have one part root and one part home, right ?
thanks you in advance to help myself,
have a nice week,
regards.
Dorian ROSSE.
________________________________
De : stan <upaitag(a)zoho.com>
Envoyé : mardi 25 avril 2023 21:10
À : Dorian ROSSE <dorianbrice(a)hotmail.fr>
Objet : Re: Broken by the grub startup after have move whole the system from one SSHDD more small to a SSD more big by a software acronis
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:27:28 +0000
Dorian ROSSE <dorianbrice(a)hotmail.fr> wrote:
> dear stan,
>
>
> the setup broken were wear two part for fedora either one root and
> one home in addtion the fat32 was a windows ten although fedora start
> with the pen USB unfortunately it start broken firstly the
> troubleshouting ask either one first boot nor one second boot however
> it go back for start in easy displaying,
How did you move to the new hard drive? It looks like it didn't
preserve the existing layout on the old drive if both windows and
fedora were working there.
>
> secondly if i want attach the part sdb1 i happen one error explaining
> by the shell who say that the system is readen only in read :
Yes, you can display on the screen, but you cannot redirect output to a
file.
Show the
output of
ls -nd /mnt/sysimage
You want it to look like this:
drwxr-xr-x. 2 0 0 4096 May 8 2022 /mnt/sysimage
with different date.
The says owner is root (0) and the owner has rwx permissions.
So, after you have created the directory sysimage, run
chmod 755 /mnt/sysimage
Then when you create the chroot, root will be able to write things to
the file system as it will be read write for root.
>
> [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sysimage
> mount: /mnt/sysimage: ATTENTION: source protégée en écriture, montée
> en lecture seule.
>
> I show the happening from one good line of command :
>
> [liveuser@localhost-live ~]$ lsblk --fs
> NAME FSTYPE FSVER LABEL UUID FSAVAIL
> FSUSE% MOUNTPOINTS loop0
> squash 4.0
> loop1
> ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85
> ├─live-rw
> │ ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> │ 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85 1,4G
> 80% / └─live-base
> ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85
> loop2
>
> └─live-rw
> ext4 1.0 Anaconda
> 2074eb84-624c-4790-83b6-8f3e4a82ae85 1,4G
The above is the live system.
> 80% / sda
> ├─sda1
> │ vfat FAT32 8610-1067
> └─sda2
> ntfs fedora
> 62C48A62C48A3875
This is an ntfs filesystem for fedora. fedora will be on ext4 or btrfs,
depending on when it was installed. ext4 is the older default, btrfs
is the newer one. Did fedora ever run from this drive? It shouldn't
be able to boot. How did you install?
Can you boot to the windows on this drive? I don't think it exists
anymore.
> sdb
> └─sdb1
> vfat FAT32 FEDORA-WS-L
> B099-D599 5,4G
This drive is all windows formatted, so there is no fedora that I can
see, and if this is the EFI partition it is using the whole disk.
I would prefer the output of blkid, because it shows more information
about the partitions.
I don't think there is anything recoverable on these hard drives.
After you have created the /mnt/sysimage directory read write, mount it
as follows:
mount /dev/sda2/ /mnt/sysimage
Then run
ls /mnt/sysimage
Does it show the root directory of fedora?
afs bin boot dev etc home lib lib64 lost+found media mnt opt
proc root run sbin srv sys tmp usr var
If it doesn't, there is no fedora left.
If it does, you can run the commands like:
cat /mnt/sysimage/etc/fstab > /tmp/install-fstab.txt
Try the commands I gave before, but from the data you have provided so
far, I think you are going to have to reinstall both windows and
fedora, since it looks like both of them are gone. It might be
possible to change the filesystem type on the fedora partition with a
partition tool, from ntfs to ext4 or btrfs, whichever is correct. If
grub is trying to read information written as ext4 or btrfs as ntfs,
nothing is going to work. Have you made any changes to the disk
information?
You can install directly from the live system if fedora and windows are
gone.
12 months
NetworkManager vs systemd-networkd
by Mike Wright
Hi all,
I've never been a fanboi when it came to NetworkManager so when I
installed f38 I used systemd-networkd. I found it straight forward and
was able to set up my networking very easily.
Does anybody know which way forward Fedora is going? That is,
NetworkManager with nmcli or systemd-networkd with networkctl? Or are
they going to co-exist?
Enquiring minds...
Thanks,
Mike Wright
12 months
Aaugh! F38 mplayer, ffmpeg, etc. install errors
by Tom Horsley
Anyone know what is up with this:
[root@zooty /]# dnf install mplayer
google-chrome 4.9 kB/s | 3.6 kB 00:00
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package libswscale-free-6.0-4.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libswscale-free provided by libswscale-free-6.0-4.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libswscale-free provided by libswscale-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- package mplayer-1.5.1-0.4.20230228svn.fc38.x86_64 requires ffmpeg-libs(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
Is there some mish-mash of free and non free stuff conflicting
with rpmfusion mplayer these days? Checking to see what uses
libswscale-free, I see scads of things that would be deleted
by removing it.
12 months
Upgrading to F38, setroubleshoot-server seems to be taking a long
time
by Max Pyziur
Greetings,
Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2012 vintage w a
1TB SSD, the scriplet/upgrade to setroubleshoot-server is hanging.
Seems that it's been this way for a least 5-10 minutes while everything
before this has been running briskly.
Advice?
Max Pyziur
pyz(a)brama.com
12 months
F37 - dnf update error
by Robert Moskowitz
On a F37 system I have not updated in maybe a month or more, I get the
error:
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so conflicts between
attempted installs of libheif-hevc-1.15.1-2.fc37.1.x86_64 and
libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc37.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-x265.so conflicts between attempted
installs of libheif-hevc-1.15.1-2.fc37.1.x86_64 and
libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc37.x86_64
How do I get around this?
Maybe first update without freeworld?
thanks
12 months
0 network conection??
by ToddAndMargo
# nmcli conn show --active
NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE
Wired connection 2 3d30b55f-3675-3e71-88fd-a9796720a9f3 ethernet eno2
virbr0 5ed314a7-f7d5-4719-9f8a-e144718b6288 bridge virbr
0
What is with the "0" all by itself at the end?
12 months
