Re: bridge and tc bandwith management
Hi Ryan. I see that uve done a pretty good job using only TC as a bandwidth
shapper. Can i ask u a favor? Could u send me an exemple of shapping 4
different IP addresses with four different speeds.
EX: 10.0.0.15 = 256kbps
10.0.0.16 = 384kbps
10.0.0.17 = 512kbps
10.0.0.18 = 768kbps
is that a way to shappe inbound speed different than the outbound speed
using TC? if that is, could u send me an example script too? thanks a lot.
Cristian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Rothert" <ryan(a)rothert.com>
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: bridge and tc bandwith management
Hello,
I finally got iptables to work with my bridge using the kernel from
arjanv's
page (2.6.3-2.1.253.2.1) ... Im trying to now get tc to work so I
can
shape
some traffic. When I enter the following commands , there are no
errors,
however the tc rules are having no effect on the IP im trying to shape.
I just want to limit IP 10.0.0.17 to 512k, and 10.0.0.18 to 1024k and so
on, Here are my tc rules
DEV=eth0
tc qdisc del dev $DEV root
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100mbit
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 512kbit allot 1500
prio
5 bounded isolated
tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip dst
10.0.0.17 flowid 1:1
tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 16 u32 match ip src
10.0.0.17 flowid 1:1
eth0 is internal interface ---\
|------br0 (I gave br0 an IP just
for management)
eth1 is external interface---/
Any thoughts on why this doesnt work ? I have used these same rules on
another Fedora box that acts as a NAT/router and that worked fine,
but this new box has to act has a bridge.
Thanks,
Ryan
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list