f29 : net-install error - anyone successful? - users - Fedora Mailing-Lists

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

f29 : net-install error - anyone successful?

Email Question - OT

KDE Desktop Environment Doesn't...

Adrian Sevcenco

Saturday, 23 February 2019 Sat, 23 Feb '19

2:14 a.m.

Hi! It would seem that there is a bug in f29 net-install .. The installer breaks with : dnf.exceptions.TransactionCheckError: sssd-common < 2.0.0-5.f29 conflicts with sssd-nfs-idmap-2.0.0-5.f29.x86_64 Does anyone have an idea about it? Thank you! Adrian

Attachments:

smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature — 2.2 KB)

Reply

Show replies by date

stan

Saturday, 23 February Sat, 23 Feb

10:49 a.m.

On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:14:13 +0200 Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco(a)cern.ch> wrote:

Hi! It would seem that there is a bug in f29 net-install .. The installer breaks with : dnf.exceptions.TransactionCheckError: sssd-common < 2.0.0-5.f29 conflicts with sssd-nfs-idmap-2.0.0-5.f29.x86_64 Does anyone have an idea about it?

Is this just with the basic install and no package install from the network? That is, are you using only the packages on the CD/DVD/USB? If so, that would be a bug in the f29 net-install ISO. Otherwise, you could just do the basic netinstall, then boot into it and do the dnf install of other packages as normal. Then it would just be a package conflict, and skip-broken would skip it. If it is a broken install image, you should bugzilla it at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ I think the images are checked as part of the release process so this shouldn't be true, but that is done by volunteers so it might not have been checked.

Reply

Adrian Sevcenco

11:55 a.m.

On 2/23/19 6:49 PM, stan via users wrote:

On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:14:13 +0200 Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco(a)cern.ch> wrote: > Hi! It would seem that there is a bug in f29 net-install .. > The installer breaks with : > dnf.exceptions.TransactionCheckError: sssd-common < 2.0.0-5.f29 > conflicts with sssd-nfs-idmap-2.0.0-5.f29.x86_64 > > Does anyone have an idea about it? Is this just with the basic install and no package install from the network? That is, are you using only the packages on the CD/DVD/USB? If so, that would be a bug in the f29 net-install ISO.

no, i mirror the fedora repo and use all packages from there (fedora/releases/29/Everything/x86_64/os)

Otherwise, you could just do the basic netinstall, then boot into it and do the dnf install of other packages as normal. Then it would just be a package conflict, and skip-broken would skip it.

well, i commented out the fedora-update repo and the install worked .. so, i would say that it is a bug as i would expect that the update repository to be compatible with the install image

If it is a broken install image, you should bugzilla it at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

yup, i submitted trough the included mechanism from anaconda

I think the images are checked as part of the release process so this shouldn't be true, but that is done by volunteers so it might not have been checked.

well, i would say that always a net install should be checked with update repository enabled... thanks! adrian

Reply

stan

3:29 p.m.

On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:55:14 +0200 Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco(a)cern.ch> wrote:

On 2/23/19 6:49 PM, stan via users wrote:

> Otherwise, you could just do the basic netinstall, then boot into > it and do the dnf install of other packages as normal. Then it > would just be a package conflict, and skip-broken would skip it. well, i commented out the fedora-update repo and the install worked .. so, i would say that it is a bug as i would expect that the update repository to be compatible with the install image

The update repo changes with time while the install image doesn't.

> If it is a broken install image, you should bugzilla it at > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ yup, i submitted trough the included mechanism from anaconda

Probably going to be closed as notabug because they can't fix it. It is just the way fedora works.

> I think the images are checked as part of the release process so > this shouldn't be true, but that is done by volunteers so it might > not have been checked. well, i would say that always a net install should be checked with update repository enabled...

It might have at freeze time, but the update repo changes constantly. The fedora repo is frozen when the release is frozen, so that it works with the released image, as you discovered. The inconsistency you ran into is not uncommon with regular dnf updates. Glad you got it worked out.

Reply

Samuel Sieb

4:34 p.m.

On 2/23/19 12:14 AM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:

Hi! It would seem that there is a bug in f29 net-install .. The installer breaks with : dnf.exceptions.TransactionCheckError: sssd-common < 2.0.0-5.f29 conflicts with sssd-nfs-idmap-2.0.0-5.f29.x86_64

It looks like you got an out of date mirror or some other package is holding it back. Did "dnf update" work after you did the install without updates?

Reply

1882

days inactive

1882

days old

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Manage subscription

4 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

Adrian Sevcenco
Samuel Sieb
stan