Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17??
So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages needed downgrading, but didn't note what they were. Didn't use the alloweasing or other options.
After the upgrade running dnf upgrade comes out with this. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64 - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ Problem 2: package winehq-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-devel = 1:9.20-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package winehq-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64 - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ - nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
Package Arch Version Repository Size Skipping packages with broken dependencies: wine-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 1.3 GiB winehq-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 62.1 KiB
Nothing to do.
Note: winehq does not yet have a Fedora 41 repo. Only shows support for 39 and 40 on main page, but does have older repo directories going back to 25?
So, not sure if this means Fedora Repos don't have these packages, or if they are needed in the winehq or other repos for 41?? The wine runs fine, but just convert from 9.20 to 9.17?
Thanks.
+------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@guam.net mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com mailto:msetzerii@gmx.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+
On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 7:13 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17??
So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages needed downgrading, but didn't note what they were. Didn't use the alloweasing or other options.
After the upgrade running dnf upgrade comes out with this. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ Problem 2: package winehq-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-devel = 1:9.20-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
winehq-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
Package Arch Version Repository Size Skipping packages with broken dependencies: wine-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 1.3 GiB winehq-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 62.1 KiB
Nothing to do.
Note: winehq does not yet have a Fedora 41 repo. Only shows support for 39 and 40 on main page, but does have older repo directories going back to 25?
So, not sure if this means Fedora Repos don't have these packages, or if they are needed in the winehq or other repos for 41?? The wine runs fine, but just convert from 9.20 to 9.17?
Maybe related: https://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=39616. From the comment by dimesio :
Installing packages built for Fedora 40 into Fedora 41 is not supported. In this particular case, the reason dnf won't install it is because the Fedora 41 distro repository has a different version of the libav* dependencies than 40. That problem should disappear when we build packages for Fedora 41 because they will be built in Fedora 41.
As for the reference to 9.17, that appears to be a reference to the version you already have installed on your system. Are you sure that's not the distro Wine package, installed when you upgraded your OS?
Jeff
On 3 Nov 2024 at 19:20, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Send reply to: noloader@gmail.com From: Jeffrey Walton noloader@gmail.com Date sent: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 19:20:40 -0500 Subject: Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue. To: mikes@guam.net, Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 7:13 PM Michael D. Setzer II via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17??
So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages needed downgrading, but didn't note what they were. Didn't use the alloweasing or other options.
After the upgrade running dnf upgrade comes out with this. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ Problem 2: package winehq-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-devel = 1:9.20-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
winehq-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
Package Arch Version Repository Size Skipping packages with broken dependencies: wine-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 1.3 GiB winehq-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 62.1 KiB
Nothing to do.
Note: winehq does not yet have a Fedora 41 repo. Only shows support for 39 and 40 on main page, but does have older repo directories going back to 25?
So, not sure if this means Fedora Repos don't have these packages, or if they are needed in the winehq or other repos for 41?? The wine runs fine, but just convert from 9.20 to 9.17?
Maybe related: https://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?t=39616. From the comment by dimesio :
Installing packages built for Fedora 40 into Fedora 41 is not supported. In this particular case, the reason dnf won't install it is because the Fedora 41 distro repository has a different version of the libav* dependencies than 40. That problem should disappear when we build packages for Fedora 41 because they will be built in Fedora 41. As for the reference to 9.17, that appears to be a reference to the version you already have installed on your system. Are you sure that's not the distro Wine package, installed when you upgraded your OS?Jeff
Thanks for reply. I had posted that on the winehq forum. Issue is that the machine had the 9.20 version installed on system before the upgrade. So it had the 9.20 version, but somehow during the upgrade from 40 to 41, it downgraded the winehq-devel and wine-devel to 9.17?
So, the version that was installed was 9.20 not the 9.17, so can only assume that the dnf upgrade for some reason downgraded the 9.20 to 9.17?
Guess will just have to wait till they create a Fedora 41 winehq repo. Will hold off upgrading my other 6 Fedora 40 machines.
+------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mikes@guam.net mailto:msetzerii@gmail.com mailto:msetzerii@gmx.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +------------------------------------------------------------+
On 11/3/24 16:12, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17??
So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages needed downgrading, but didn't note what they were. Didn't use the alloweasing or other options.
After the upgrade running dnf upgrade comes out with this. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ Problem 2: package winehq-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-devel = 1:9.20-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
winehq-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
Package Arch Version Repository Size Skipping packages with broken dependencies: wine-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 1.3 GiB winehq-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1 WineHQ 62.1 KiB
Nothing to do.
Note: winehq does not yet have a Fedora 41 repo. Only shows support for 39 and 40 on main page, but does have older repo directories going back to 25?
So, not sure if this means Fedora Repos don't have these packages, or if they are needed in the winehq or other repos for 41?? The wine runs fine, but just convert from 9.20 to 9.17?
Thanks.
Hi Mike,
This is a bug I reported to WineHQ:
Wine-staging 9.19-1 broken dependencies https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
The long and short of the story is WineHQ will get to it when they get to it. They actually got a little annoyed with me for trying to get them to jump pm the issue before FC41 went general release.
In he mean time, this will get you your other updates and bypass WineHQ:
sudo dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disablerepo=WineHQ
HTH, -T (T/Mr.T/Todd/Dude/His Resplendence)
-
Jeffrey Walton -
Michael D. Setzer II -
ToddAndMargo