FC29. I have a server for video encoding. I use x264, which I keep updated to the most recent git packaaged in an rpm.
rpm -q x264-libs x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I then rebuild all the packages that depend on x264, including avidemux-libs. I just rebuild on my machine, without chaging the version, since the version hasn't changed, it's just linked to the new x264 version.
rpm -q avidemux-libs avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64
But dnf want to replace my rebuild version, with the version for the repo:
dnf upgrade --refresh .............. Problem 1: package avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 requires libx264.so.155()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both x264-libs-0.155-2.20180806git0a84d98.fc29.x86_64 and x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I don't want to bump the avidemux-libs version, since I want to know when a new one is available. I don't want to keep adding "-x avidemux.."
Why does dnf want to replace the installed package ? How does it even know it's not the same package as the repo ?
sean
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 13:09 -0400, sean darcy wrote:
FC29. I have a server for video encoding. I use x264, which I keep updated to the most recent git packaaged in an rpm.
rpm -q x264-libs x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I then rebuild all the packages that depend on x264, including avidemux-libs. I just rebuild on my machine, without chaging the version, since the version hasn't changed, it's just linked to the new x264 version.
rpm -q avidemux-libs avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64
But dnf want to replace my rebuild version, with the version for the repo:
dnf upgrade --refresh .............. Problem 1: package avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 requires libx264.so.155()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both
x264-libs-0.155-2.20180806git0a84d98.fc29.x86_64 and x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I don't want to bump the avidemux-libs version, since I want to know when a new one is available. I don't want to keep adding "-x avidemux.."
Why does dnf want to replace the installed package ? How does it even know it's not the same package as the repo ?
sean
Hi,
You do need to bump in some way. You can...
Original: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1
Your rebuild: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.1
Any new version from repo i.e. will be -2 or above and update as normal if/when released.
Regards
Phil
- -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.***
Playing the game for the games sake.
Twitter: kathenasorg IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas
GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77
On 4/19/19 1:39 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 13:09 -0400, sean darcy wrote:
FC29. I have a server for video encoding. I use x264, which I keep updated to the most recent git packaaged in an rpm.
rpm -q x264-libs x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I then rebuild all the packages that depend on x264, including avidemux-libs. I just rebuild on my machine, without chaging the version, since the version hasn't changed, it's just linked to the new x264 version.
rpm -q avidemux-libs avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64
But dnf want to replace my rebuild version, with the version for the repo:
dnf upgrade --refresh .............. Problem 1: package avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.fc29.x86_64 requires libx264.so.155()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both x264-libs-0.155-2.20180806git0a84d98.fc29.x86_64 and x264-libs-0.157-0.20190331.fc29.x86_64
I don't want to bump the avidemux-libs version, since I want to know when a new one is available. I don't want to keep adding "-x avidemux.."
Why does dnf want to replace the installed package ? How does it even know it's not the same package as the repo ?
sean
Hi,
You do need to bump in some way. You can...
Original: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1
Your rebuild: avidemux-libs-2.7.3-1.1
Any new version from repo i.e. will be -2 or above and update as normal if/when released.
Regards
Phil
Good idea, and it worked, thanks.
sean