--- On Wed, 5/2/12, Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net> wrote:
From: Chris Adams <cmadams(a)hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: Fedora 18 release name
To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 3:13 PM
Once upon a time, Alan Cox <alan(a)lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
said:
> You can have fun with physicists 8)
As a mathematician, I look at "spherical" and want to ask if
Fedora
accepts the Axiom of Choice - if so, we can have two
identical spherical
cows, but who really wants to decompose a cow to get
there. Of course,
we'd have to call F19 Banach-Tarski!
--
Sorry to disagree!, but if we allow Mathematicians' names here, I have some others
that are far greater than Banach and Tarski, take
F19 Euclid - Greatest Geometer of all time
F19 Archimedes
take Paul Erdös, Euler, Riemann, Gauss, All would be great here :)
Sadly, though Spherical you would be correct sir, I also thought about Lobachevsky, but he
apparently did work on HyperBolic Geometries :)
But to get back at the naming, How about the tribute to Denis Ritchie, was the next
version of Fedora going to be named in his honor, since he was one of the pioneers of
C/C++ and the Unix operating system which is the prototype of the system that we are
using?
Just like the American Political System, we have no voice and no vote :(, the "Ruling
Elite" are the ones that chose names and vote, us the users are the ones that have to
end up with whatever others choose if we are not part of the "Ruling Elite" :(
Is there an electoral college in the Fedora voting? Because if there is, the majority
does not get to choose the name :(
Best Regards,
Antonio