November 2009 - websites - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora Infrastructure] #1828: Update link in new footer

by fedora-badges

#1828: Update link in new footer -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- The new site-wide footer used by spins.fedoraproject.org (and other fp.o sites in the future) has a link for the text describing the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora. Red Hat has provided a more appropriate page here: http://www.redhat.com/rhel/fedora/ The link needs to be changed to point to this new URL. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1828> Fedora Infrastructure <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure> Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code.

14 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

Re: Please help me with HASH results being wrong!

by Todd Zullinger

Lee Clark wrote: > Thats odd > > your site says SHA1 You missed the large red notice on https://fedoraproject.org/verify as well as this paragraph in my previous reply: I wrote: > (The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation > to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. > https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify > downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used.) This is a common misconception. We'll work on trying to make it clearer in future releases. Of course, there's only so much we can do. ;-) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When I think about all the crap I learned in high school ... it's a wonder I can think at all. -- Paul Simon

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Please help me with HASH results being wrong!

by Lee Clark

I down loaded Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso and then downloaded both of the windows Hash programs I ran them both and found this for the SHA1 results. Seeing it was not the same as below from your web site I down loaded the file again changing the name to. Fedora-12-i686-Live_(2).iso Again I ran both hash programs got the same answer both match each other but do not match your web page info. DAF4B3EA2322DFEE9A473099557AC9ED7C6D3159 DAF4B3EA2322DFEE9A473099557AC9ED7C6D3159 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001 Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBSvhuy50cw0hXu8y6AQKZphAAkz0b/jNTOcTUby/UmmGOAsPHcoPIqnSB TyGVDrdVew49xM9IBKxAfyt5Jmxjax8+/5keJMFrKFdXAWyjC3wsrMGnLpY8/3jJ Zf5DwILR8esBtTOS/7LTBeA1VAnaiPJbPlzlcLWO7C3lNgNQQFcnRYSB37a8ySvf tt02BW99GGwKSxy327yyVp7haZ43SFUDvq22CFFpGeWk8GibufgCRvveu/+K4MuI c0DAuS5aYPz+q/2Zzva+Q+X2CI3+DEm0pwvmP9WzCO4x6mMku0TfgxpDnVmdFw+H Yt/uulM+v9DOuhOaMnA82N9jlMRt0jhMbcE+R8oms9ZejIfCXf1vFLSzPttboksV xyanTuqngp3JvOydsRwiT0oqAPyXhqhBrlPlPe/MizRk4N0uE1+vOn7zrSMz6yUU 89mSiz3viSMaWww1mYpsE/LlrlAavVlVED2SmfscAtyyRmXbuR3VU981C9T4A9be LFpUuCCxmO9dZP+ObazfJJds4odO09oqKxexLpum6LbN1AUS6MzGr7pGzSBcZyQv +wIgyWG8tuOCjM65/hoDafQwUPV8mZQcBLLWnCgp4Wrpo+SlDgs8xzgtBxC1nijx GebP25HQ/ZCEyomNYcEhw7iaaL/JePLvSkPYw5o1y9Fy/jqrDnjJk9dYuurMD3Nd TGHTB0y2rJI= =ydAW ----- Lee Clark Lee_lvd(a)yahoo.com or lee_clark_ftc(a)yahoo.com 970-388-5623 ________________________________ My signature file! "Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow." - Plato "In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity. " - Albert Einstein ________________________________ "IN GOD WE TRUST" AMEN! ________________________________

14 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

please disregard previous post

by Daniel Villarreal

Please disregard my previous post... Sorry. Just noticed the line in the red square... "Please note that the Hash: SHA1 line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does not specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files." > $ cat Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 1bb64a4eedecf4730b47fcbb6c17b49d6deaccf7b00b17dd7b1091af57cf1c1e Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) >

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

SHA256 checksums listed as SHA1 checksums

by Daniel Villarreal

re: Fedora 12 SHA256 checksums listed as SHA1 checksums > $ cat Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 1bb64a4eedecf4730b47fcbb6c17b49d6deaccf7b00b17dd7b1091af57cf1c1e Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) ... > Thanks Daniel Villarreal

14 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[PATCH] Make it clear that 'Hash: SHA1' does not specify the checksum hash

by Todd Zullinger

This should only be needed until the rel-eng adds some explanatory text directly to the *-CHECKSUM files. This is planned for F13 (by Oxf13 ;). --- Thoughts? Is 'warning' too strong? I wasn't sure if 'note' would stand out enough. Perhaps I'm just grumpy after seeing so much confusion about this. ;) I'm also torn about the placement. It might be better to move up to the top of the page, above the "Windows user?" note. fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html index f763b01..51a2402 100644 --- a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html +++ b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ <li><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM">i386 (KDE)</a></li> <li><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHEC...">x86_64 (KDE)</a></li> </ul> + + ${Markup(_('Please note that the Hash: SHA1 line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does not specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files.'))} + ${Markup(_('Next, import Fedora\'s GPG key(s):'))} -- 1.6.5.2 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow they may make it illegal.

14 years, 5 months

2
2
0 / 0

New Fedora 12 checksum are listed as SHA1 but are SHA256 Hash

by V Stuart Foote

Hi, The posted checksums to verify ISOs for at least the i386 ISOs suggests the Hash is SHA1, but the value is SHA256 for the Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso, suspect they may all be SHA256 https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Probably should correct the mislabeled entry(s). =-=-= V Stuart Foote Systems Analyst Geological Sciences College of Sciences University of Texas at San Antonio One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249-0663 office (210) 458-4962 fax (210) 458-4469

14 years, 5 months

2
2
0 / 0

Fedora 12 i386 DVD ISO Checksum File

by Stewart Todd Morgan

Hi, I am not sure if this is a developer issue or a website issue, so please forward it to the appropriate party. I downloaded the i386 Fedora 12 ISO and downloaded the https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM file from https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify. The hash in the checksum file is marked as SHA1, but the checksum actually appears to be an SHA256 checksum (according to the instructions on the web page and when I use sha256sum against the ISO). Some folks may be confused by the SHA1 marker in the checksum file, particularly if they don't both to read the instructions on the web page. Todd

14 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

Problem

by Luca Cecchi - Eldes

Good morning, I'm very interested in your Fedora LAB live dvd but I haven't any torrent port opened. Can I download the distribution in a different way? Maybe http or fttp download. Thanks, Luac

14 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

I want a fedora 12 installation cd

by Anshu Sharma

Sir Respectfully I want a fedora 12 installation cd I am doing RHCE cource from HCL CDC. I have three books of linux cource but no cd inside books so sir plz I want a Cd of fedora 12. I want fedora 12 plz replay! I am waiting your answer………? akhilesh sharma The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

14 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites November 2009