12:15 p.m.
Hi all,
I wondered if somebody could help me out and create a static version of the
Beta release notes at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Beta/ReleaseNotes ?
Hopefully we'll be able to avoid the problems this caused with the Alpha
release :)
Many thanks,
Jon
8:36 a.m.
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 11:15 -0600, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
Hi all,
I wondered if somebody could help me out and create a static version of the
Beta release notes at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Beta/ReleaseNotes ?
Hopefully we'll be able to avoid the problems this caused with the Alpha
release :)
Great point. We should also give thought to where we provide links to
these notes too, and direct them to the static page.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
11:47 a.m.
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:36 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 11:15 -0600, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wondered if somebody could help me out and create a static version of the
> Beta release notes at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Beta/ReleaseNotes ?
>
> Hopefully we'll be able to avoid the problems this caused with the Alpha
> release :)
Great point. We should also give thought to where we provide links to
these notes too, and direct them to the static page.
IIRC, the actual wiki page is turned 'immutable' and actually served as
static from that URL.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
8:17 a.m.
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:47 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:36 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 11:15 -0600, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I wondered if somebody could help me out and create a static version of the
> > Beta release notes at
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Beta/ReleaseNotes ?
> >
> > Hopefully we'll be able to avoid the problems this caused with the Alpha
> > release :)
>
> Great point. We should also give thought to where we provide links to
> these notes too, and direct them to the static page.
IIRC, the actual wiki page is turned 'immutable' and actually served as
static from that URL.
If there's not a significant load from calling Moin and having it
assemble everything to display the page, then that sounds fine. Did
that work OK, performance-wise, in the past?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
7:44 p.m.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:47 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade
wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 09:36 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 11:15 -0600, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I wondered if somebody could help me out and create a static version of
the
> > > Beta release notes at
> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Beta/ReleaseNotes ?
> > >
> > > Hopefully we'll be able to avoid the problems this caused with the
Alpha
> > > release :)
> >
> > Great point. We should also give thought to where we provide links to
> > these notes too, and direct them to the static page.
>
> IIRC, the actual wiki page is turned 'immutable' and actually served as
> static from that URL.
If there's not a significant load from calling Moin and having it
assemble everything to display the page, then that sounds fine. Did
that work OK, performance-wise, in the past?
They've always performed horribly in the past. Basically we use wget to
get the page and then use apache to serve just that link as a static page.
We've had to do this for almost every release when someone linked to the
wiki directly.
We try to do it as close to the date a possible though because the page
cannot be changed without taking the static option away.
-Mike
11:18 p.m.
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 19:44 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> If there's not a significant load from calling Moin and
having it
> assemble everything to display the page, then that sounds fine. Did
> that work OK, performance-wise, in the past?
They've always performed horribly in the past. Basically we use wget to
get the page and then use apache to serve just that link as a static page.
We've had to do this for almost every release when someone linked to the
wiki directly.
We try to do it as close to the date a possible though because the page
cannot be changed without taking the static option away.
I pulled the websites code and started to put together a static HTML
page from the Beta release notes on the wiki. The biggest hassle is the
conversion. I actually rendered the page as DocBook, then wrote that to
HTML, and am pulling from that into a page in the fedoraproject.org
tree.
Maybe we'll have this ready by tomorrow?
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
6:09 p.m.
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 21:18 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
Maybe we'll have this ready by tomorrow?
Yep, Paul just tweaked one of my misteaks and committed that. It's
ready to final QA and push to live.
--
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
5909
days inactive
5916
days old
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jonathan Roberts -
Karsten Wade -
Mike McGrath -
Paul W. Frields