Vandalism on our FUDCon: namespace wiki pages is becoming a huge drag. What can we do to fix this problem? Can we move these old pages into the main namespace so we only have to worry about the newest FUDCon pages?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:55:00AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Vandalism on our FUDCon: namespace wiki pages is becoming a huge drag. What can we do to fix this problem? Can we move these old pages into the main namespace so we only have to worry about the newest FUDCon pages?
+1
IIRC, that was the plan all along. Only active FUDCon pages should be open, and that really only means one or two pages. We should not have open pages for proposed FUDCons, for example.
- Karsten
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58:54PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:55:00AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Vandalism on our FUDCon: namespace wiki pages is becoming a huge drag. What can we do to fix this problem? Can we move these old pages into the main namespace so we only have to worry about the newest FUDCon pages?
+1
IIRC, that was the plan all along. Only active FUDCon pages should be open, and that really only means one or two pages. We should not have open pages for proposed FUDCons, for example.
Archive: also works well for this purpose.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:18:13PM -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58:54PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:55:00AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Vandalism on our FUDCon: namespace wiki pages is becoming a huge drag. What can we do to fix this problem? Can we move these old pages into the main namespace so we only have to worry about the newest FUDCon pages?
+1
IIRC, that was the plan all along. Only active FUDCon pages should be open, and that really only means one or two pages. We should not have open pages for proposed FUDCons, for example.
Archive: also works well for this purpose.
So, should I take this as a consensus from wiki gardeners that it's OK for me to move these pages to Archive: then?
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 08:24:54AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:18:13PM -0500, Ian Weller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58:54PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:55:00AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Vandalism on our FUDCon: namespace wiki pages is becoming a huge drag. What can we do to fix this problem? Can we move these old pages into the main namespace so we only have to worry about the newest FUDCon pages?
+1
IIRC, that was the plan all along. Only active FUDCon pages should be open, and that really only means one or two pages. We should not have open pages for proposed FUDCons, for example.
Archive: also works well for this purpose.
So, should I take this as a consensus from wiki gardeners that it's OK for me to move these pages to Archive: then?
+1 from me
Also, I'm dead certain this was the original plan when we decided to open the FUDCon: namespace to anonymous, so I'll reference my +1 from back then.
Need any help? I hang out on #fedora-docs and we haven't played in a while. :)
- Karsten
-
Ian Weller -
Karsten Wade -
Paul W. Frields