On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 00:41, Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com&gt; wrote: > What do you guys think? Is it mature enough? Can it compete with > quodlibet I tried it out, seems nice and light but I had problem with searching the library. It did not quite work.

Am Freitag, den 10.02.2012, 17:09 +0000 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > commit 6690f0db6e5e48403122f8fda9a9fefbd1f9b640 > Author: Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; > Date: Fri Feb 10 10:08:40 2012 -0700 > > xfce: Drop quodlibet for now until we can sort out dep issues. How about replacing quodlibet with pragha? I know pragha is not as powerful as quodlibet, e.g. it doesn't do internet radio or and come with a standalone tagging application, but there are some things I like about it: * It's written in C and has a very lightweight memory footprint (much unlike quodlibet, which is written in python). * It's using GStreamer now, so it can be easily extended with other codecs. * It perfectly integrated with Xfce: Take a look at the settings dialog and you'll see what I mean. It now even builds against exo and supports saving playlists with the Xfce session. * It supports hotkeys out of the box, we could drop the patches we have for quodlibet in libxfceui4. * It just reached 1.0. What do you guys think? Is it mature enough? Can it compete with quodlibet

How about replacing quodlibet with pragha?