On úterý 24. října 2023 0:31:49 CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
On pátek 30. prosince 2022 20:01:55 CEST Ben Cotton wrote:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
> by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
>
> == Summary ==
> Rpmautospec (`%autorelease` and `%autochangelog`) is recommended as
> the default approach.
> Packaging Guidelines and other documentation are adjusted to describe
> this approach first.
> Various tools that provide spec file templates are adjusted.
While on it, could we please make %changelog optional?
Whooops! My INBOX got reordered, and it is obvious it is too late for
me :-) sorry for bumping this old thread (I have just been dealing with
autospec on multiple levels recently so I thought this thread was also
relevant).
Packaging become an automatized task, and maintainers don't pay
attention to %changelog beauty so they simply generate it from git-log
(but I'd claim that git-log != %changelog). Seems that
%changelog become one of the most painful maintainers' headache :)
What do you think about a static changelog like:
%changelog
* See
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/<PKG>/commits/rawhide
Aren't we ready to admit (something like) this is enough?
Pavel