Chris Jones wrote:
Also, +1 to the fact its not as good a news as if ATrpms had also
been
incorporated. If rpmfusion and ATrpms turn out as (in)compatible as say
livna and ATrpms are now, then on a practical level the merger is no
where near as useful as it could have been.
Yeah, +10 to it being nowhere as good as if ATrpms were included in the
merger, since the bulk of the overlap/conflicts in the 3rd-party repo
world are between livna and ATrpms. Now they'll just be between
rpmfusion and ATrpms. Suck. End-users still lose.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson(a)redhat.com