On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 20:23 -0800, Pete Rowley wrote:
> ok
>
> Richard Megginson wrote:
>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227771
>> Resolves: bug 227771
>> Bug Description: FHS: use sysconfdir (/etc) as config file location
>> Reviewed by: ???
>> Files: see diff
>> Branch: HEAD
>> Fix Description: After much deliberation, we have decided that it is
>> ok that our dynamic config files are under /etc/fedora-ds/slapd-instance.
>> So the config_dir will be /etc/fedora-ds/slapd-instance and the
>> security and schema files will go there as well. Since the FHS is
>> ambiguous about this issue, and it will be very confusing if the
>> configuration files are not under /etc, and there are some agents
>> (webmin, cfengine) that do "dynamically" modify config files under
>> /etc, this outweighs any considerations about having the server using
>> it's config file like an "ascii database".
>>
The debian folks (who take FHS seriously) won't buy that. The real test
is the ability to have a read only /etc. This sounds like a /var/lib
thing.
Before you get into pain over this, I suggest finding a FHS expert.
Does Debian forbid cfengine? webmin? If you do need to occasionally
edit a config file, do you have to change the permissions on /etc to
read-write, then change it back? Note that even files such as
/etc/fstab can be dynamic as devices/filesystems are dynamically
mounted/unmounted.
Every FHS "expert" I've ever talked to (and I've talked to several) say
the FHS is ambiguous with regards to this issue.
Andrew Bartlett
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
Fedora-directory-devel(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel