On 10/15/2013 07:39 AM, Parasit Hendersson wrote:
W dniu 2013-10-15 15:24, Rich Megginson pisze:
>
>> A given solution in this case it does not help, i made (again)
>> initialization and the effect is exactly the same. What else can be
>> wrong?
>
> You initialized the server "slave port 389" from the server "master
> port 389" and you still get "Replica has a different generation ID"?
Yes, in 389 console, in "Configuration" tab, "Replication" in menu
tree, right click on replication agrement -> "Initialize Consumer"
(all data will be erased, etc) finally OK. Last status - "Total update
suceeded"
I also try from console by ldapmodify, but now i dont remember all
used comands.
Ok. Please show excerpts from the supplier and consumer errors logs
showing this happening.
>
>> Usually all changes from master are properly replicated, with some
>> unexplained exceptions and i don't know why.
>
> If you are getting "Replica has a different generation ID" then
> nothing should be replicating from "master port 389" to "slave port
> 389".
>
I know, its strange, but lots entries are replicated :/
Do you have more than one master? Is the slave getting updates from
another master?
With Regards
Parasit Hendersson
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users